You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 13, 2012

Export Controls in Vietnam

World ECR

With the continued increase in foreign trade and integration into the world economy, especially since its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2006, Vietnam has taken several legislative steps to introduce export controls into its legal regime. This article provides an overview of the current status of Vietnam’s regulations on export control.

Controls on Telecoms Equipment

Vietnam’s government and the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) have issued various regulations prohibiting or placing special conditions on the import, export, and trading in various types of telecommunications equipment. In particular, lists of prohibited products, restricted products, and products subject to special conditions have been issued. Special permits are required to import or export products subject to special conditions. For example, under Decree No. 59/2006/ND-CP, very general product categories are listed as subject to special conditions, including telecommunications equipment and wireless broadcasting and receiving equipment. This is one area where Vietnam’s export control laws can have a very broad reach.

Further stringent controls prohibiting imports of certain second-hand informatics equipment are set out in Decision No. 20/2006-QD-BBCVT, issued by the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications on 30 June 2006 (Decision No. 20). In general, almost all types of used computers, printers, hard drives, radio equipment, and various other types of equipment are prohibited for import.

Second-hand goods is one area where Vietnam strictly enforces its import regulations. In one case in 2007, citing the provisions of Decision No. 20, Vietnamese customs authorities seized thousands of second-hand digital monitors that were imported into Vietnam and imposed a US$900 fine. In general, second-hand goods may only be allowed into Vietnam with approval from the Prime Minister or with that of certain authorities in charge of the charitable sector.

Controls on Encrypted Products

As in China, Vietnam’s regulations on controls of encrypted technology focus on controlling the use of encryption within the country. Vietnam’s encryption regulations are set forth in Decree No. 73/2007/ND-CP (Decree No. 73), which was promulgated by the government on 8 May 2007. Decree No. 73 contains regulations on research activities, trading, production and the import/export of encryption and encrypted products. The highest authority in charge of encryption is the Encryption Committee of the government. Any entity that intends to trade in or produce encryption or encrypted products must have a permit from the Encryption Committee. An implementing circular for Decree No. 73 has also been issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

Under Decree No. 73, encrypted products fall under the published list of products and goods of which export and import is subject to special conditions. This means that a permit is required prior to import or export such goods. This is a very broad provision, and no further guidelines have been issued. Thus the regulations could conceivably be interpreted as casting a very wide net that could bring encryption technologies in most laptops or smart phones under the export controls on encryption. The broad reach of these export controls is further extended owing to the very broad definition of encrypted products, which basically includes any materials, technical equipment or computer software coded to protect information. Services in providing encryption are also controlled in Vietnam.

To date, however, there has been no known enforcement of these provisions in Vietnam, although the laws are on the books. In fact, a major computer industry publication in Vietnam recently published an article noting that very few of the companies or products in this area in Vietnam are operating with proper permits. Against this backdrop, a government officer in charge of this area stated that more needs to be done to educate business of the legal requirements and dangers that could arise if encryption is not managed.

Military Equipment Subject to Export/Import Controls

In Vietnam, the military authorities have also issued regulations prohibiting the import and export of certain items. These regulations were set forth under Decision No. 80/2006/QD-BQP (Decision No. 80), issued by the Vietnamese Ministry of Defense on 9 May 2006. Items in the List of Weapons, Ammunition, Explosives and Military Technical Equipment Banned from Import and Export issued under Decision No. 80 may only be imported or exported pursuant to an approval from the Prime Minister, and a permit issued by the Minister of Defense. Items banned for import and export include:

  • Explosives (other than industrial explosives), including propellant powders, prepared explosives and various detonation devices such as fuses;
  • Tanks and other armored fighting vehicles;
  • Aircraft with combat equipment or weapons;
  • Warships;
  • Other military weapons;
  • Revolvers and pistols;
  • Weapon parts;
  • Bombs, grenades, etc.; and
  • Military equipment in general, including military uniforms.

The regulations do not specify whether permits are needed for each shipment, or can be used for multiple shipments of banned items.

The provisions on the prohibition on importing aircraft set forth under Decision No. 80 were recently raised as an issue by the General Department of Customs who sought clarification as to which authorities should issue permission to import certain types of airplanes—the Ministry of Defense, or the Ministry of Transport, which also has apparent authority over airplanes.

Agricultural Imports/Exports

Controlled agricultural items fall under the authority of Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD). Vietnam is known to have strict controls of agricultural imports in order to protect the country’s key agricultural sector. Vietnam is one of the world’s largest producers of rice and coffee and 80% of the population still work primarily in agriculture.

With its vast coastline, the country is also one of the world’s major exporters of fish products. To this end, MARD has issued Circular No. 60/2009/TT-BNNPTNT, which provides guidelines on export and import controls for the domains of agriculture, forestry, and fisheries.

Timber products

Vietnam has a general ban on exports of timber products that is strictly enforced in practice. Notably, Circular No. 60 specifically prohibits exports of timber products specified in appendix I of the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). A CITES permit issued by the CITES Management Authority of Vietnam is required for any exports of timber falling under appendix II of CITES.

A few exceptions and permit application processes are set out in Circular No. 60. Exceptions are set forth for certain finished woodworks that are completely assembled or knocked-down versions of finished products that can be used immediately following assembly.

Rare and wild animals and plants

Commercial export of endangered, precious, and rare wild animals and plants from natural forest is banned, including all wild plants and animals specified in appendix I of CITES or specified under certain groups set out in Decree No. 32/2006/ND-CP of the government of Vietnam, dated 30 March 2006. Various exemptions exist for non-commercial exports for research or performance purposes. Imports of wild animals and plants specified in CITES appendices are only allowed pursuant to a permit issued by the CITES Management Authority of Vietnam.

Plant varieties

MARD periodically issues a list of plant varieties banned for export or import. Plant varieties that do not appear on this list may be imported for purposes of research and trials, pursuant to a permit obtained from MARD’s cultivation department (for agricultural plant varieties) or MARD’s forestry department (for forest plant varieties). Based on the results of trials, MARD may recognize new plant varieties and add them to a list of plant varieties permitted for production and trading that is also periodically issued. Items on this latter list may be imported without permits.

Other provisions of Circular No. 60 deal with imports and exports of livestock breeds, veterinary drugs and biologicals for veterinary use, plant protection products (pesticides, etc.), fertilizer, livestock feed, aquatic feeds, and aquatic species and breeds, as well as aquatic biologicals.

International Cooperation

As Vietnam integrates into the world economy, its governmental authorities are taking steps to bring the country’s undeveloped export controls system in line with international standards. In this regard, Vietnam’s authorities regularly participate in export controls seminars organized through organizations such as APEC, of which it is a member, in order to take steps toward implementing APEC commitments on export control, such as the APEC Key Elements for Effective Export Control Systems, which were adopted by the APEC ministers in 2004.

Vietnam has also acceded to conventions on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Recent years have seen numerous programmes implemented in Vietnam to help modernize its customs agencies and to train Vietnamese customs authorities in best practices. This has led to increased seizures of illegal crossborder goods (such as counterfeit goods and contraband).

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.