You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 4, 2025

Exemption Requests under Cambodia’s Competition Law for Franchise Agreements

Subscribe to Updates

On April 2, 2024, the Cambodian Competition Commission (CCC) issued Decision No. 087 on Requirements and Procedures of Exemptions under the Law on Competition, outlining the requirements and procedures for requesting exemptions for agreements or activities that could prevent, restrict, or distort competition in Cambodia.

Franchise agreements often include clauses such as price fixing, exclusive supply arrangements, or territorial restrictions, which could potentially raise concerns under the Law on Competition. Therefore, it is necessary for both franchisors and franchisees to understand how the law applies to their agreements and whether an exemption request may be required.

Some arrangements under franchise agreements may fall within the scope of prohibited practices under the Law on Competition. These include horizontal and vertical agreements, abuse of dominant position, and anti-competitive business combination. If a business owner contemplates that their franchise agreement could be interpreted as anti-competitive, they must assess whether to apply for an exemption.

Key Criteria for Exemption

Under Decision No. 087, the CCC may grant an exemption if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed agreement or activity meets all four of the following conditions:

  1. Significant and identifiable benefits: The agreement must provide clear technological, social, or economic benefits such as cost efficiencies, qualitative efficiencies, initiations of new technologies, or environmental and sustainable benefits.
  2. Necessity of the agreement/activities: These benefits must not be achievable without the proposed agreement or activity. The applicant must show that prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition are essential to realizing the benefits.
  3. Benefits outweigh harm: The positive impacts must significantly outweigh any adverse effects caused by the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition, and the benefits should be likely to materialize within one year.
  4. No elimination of competition: The agreement must not eliminate competition in any substantial aspect of goods or services.

Application and Supporting Documents

Applicants must submit the application form and provide evidence to support their exemption request. This typically includes submitting the franchise agreement and any other relevant supporting documents that demonstrate how the agreement or activities meet the above criteria for exemption.

Pre-Application Consultation

Decision No. 087 also allows a request for a consultation with the Consumer Protection Competition and Fraud Repression (CCF) Directorate-General before submitting a formal application. This step can help clarify the requirements and ensure that the application is complete and well-supported.

As many franchise agreements may contain provisions that are considered prohibited under competition law, it is essential to stay informed about the latest regulatory developments and the authorities’ interpretation of such agreements and arrangements.

Related Professionals

Practices

Antitrust and Competition

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 18, 2022
On July 15, 2022, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Letter No. FE-1/754 instructing banks with authorized dealer (AD) status to inform the CBM of the balances in foreign-currency accounts belonging to Myanmar companies with up to 35% foreign ownership. This was to be done by 6 p.m. on the same day. In addition, AD banks were ordered to purchase the balances of the relevant foreign-currency accounts and exchange the amounts with Myanmar kyat (MMK). These amounts are to be entered into the bank-customer (bid) and non-trade inward (real time-R) lists by 6 p.m. on July 18, 2022. The letter also warned that the failure to follow this instruction would be subject to various sanctions, including warnings, restriction of foreign exchange management functions, fines, temporary or permanent suspension of banking authorizations, and cancellation of business licenses. Letter No. FE-1/754 followed a decision made by the Foreign Exchange Supervisory Committee in meeting No. 32/2002 requiring foreign-currency balances held in accounts of Myanmar companies with up to 35% foreign ownership to be converted into MMK. A list of these companies, provided by the Foreign Exchange Supervisory Committee, was included with the letter. For more details on these foreign exchange developments, or on any aspect of financial regulations in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
July 15, 2022
On July 13, 2022, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) revoked its previous exemption from the foreign currency conversion requirement for companies that are registered with the Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) and have at least 10% foreign investment. Banks with authorized dealer  status are thus no longer permitted to exempt these companies from the CBM’s requirement to convert foreign currency transfers and balances to Myanmar kyat. This sudden revocation of the prior relaxation was circulated in CBM Letter No. FE-1/739 to AD banks for exchanging foreign currencies in Myanmar. The letter effectively reverses information the CBM circulated in meeting minutes on June 7. Notably, however, this does not affect foreign-owned companies approved by the Myanmar Investment Commission, or investments in special economic zones. These exemptions and others previously announced by the CBM in relation to the currency conversion requirement remain valid, and are not affected by this revocation. For more details on these foreign exchange developments, or on any aspect of financial regulations in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
July 12, 2022
Before the issuance in late 2019 of the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand’s Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices in Franchise Businesses, which took effect in February 2020, Thai law made little mention of franchising as a business model—despite the great popularity of franchising in the country. The guidelines, which were issued under the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017), partly made up for the absence of a single, codified franchising law in the country and offered valuable direction on how franchisors and franchisees should operate in compliance with Thai law. One of the most significant conditions introduced by the original guidelines in February 2020 was a requirement for franchisors to provide a right of first refusal to their existing franchisees before opening a new franchise outlet within current franchisees’ operating vicinity. An update to the guidelines addressing the right of first refusal was issued in August 2020. Most recently, a second update was announced on July 13, 2021. It was published in the Government Gazette on August 19, 2021, and came into force on the following day. The August 2021 update further revised this provision, and the updated guidelines now adopt a less restrictive approach for franchisors in relation to this first-refusal requirement. Under the updated guidelines, a franchisor who decides to open a new outlet, whether it will be operated by the franchisor or by another franchisee or person, must notify the existing franchisee located in closest proximity to the intended location, and provide the franchisee with a right of first refusal for a period of 30 days. However, the franchisor does not have to provide the closest franchisee with a right of first refusal if the franchisee’s existing performance does not meet the franchisor’s criteria as specified and communicated to the franchisee in advance. In determining what
Read More
June 9, 2022
On May 23, 2022, the Public Limited Companies Act (No. 4) B.E. 2565 (2022) was approved and published in the Government Gazette. The updated law amends the previous version of the Public Limited Companies Act by formally allowing board of directors (BOD) and shareholders’ meetings to be held electronically, and amending corporate approval processes for public limited companies. The new act came into effect the day after its publication, but full implementation of certain amendments will only become practical after the issuance of various related subrules and subregulations. The key elements of the new act are described below. Electronic Dissemination of Company Notices and Advertisements Under the previous version of the Public Limited Companies Act, required company notices, statements, and advertisements had to be published in a local newspaper where the company is located, for at least three consecutive days. However, the amended act allows such notices, statements, and advertisements to be sent via electronic means, though the process must comply with subregulations to be issued by the Department of Business Development (DBD). Electronic Delivery Options for Documents The amended act allows public limited company notices or documents to be sent to company directors, shareholders, or creditors electronically instead of by registered mail, as long as the recipients have consented to receive such documents via electronic means. Electronic delivery of documents must comply with subregulations to be issued by the DBD. Additional Individuals Authorized to Call BOD Meetings In keeping with the previous version of the law, the amended act grants the chairperson of the BOD the authority to call a board meeting, and allows any two directors to jointly request that the chairperson call a meeting, in which case the chairperson must call the meeting within 14 days. The amended act further stipulates that if the chairperson does
Read More