You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2016

EPC Agreements: Devising a Sound Contractual Framework for Renewable Energy Projects

Informed Counsel

The development of a renewable energy project requires, among a range of factors, engineers to design the facility, state-of-the-art equipment, and a reliable construction firm to implement the project. A key factor in a renewable energy project’s long-term success is devising an appropriate contractual framework to construct the facilities. This is a particularly important consideration, given the scale of many renewable energy projects and the financial sums at stake.  

An engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreement provides a contractual framework whereby a contractor agrees to engineer, procure, and construct a specified structure. It is often referred to as a “turnkey” agreement, since it requires the sponsor or project company to simply “turn a key” to commence operations of the constructed facility.

Advantages of the EPC Structure

From a project sponsor’s perspective, a main benefit of having an EPC agreement in place is that it provides a single point of contact and responsibility for the development of a particular project. For a project company, this avoids both the logistical confusion of coordinating among separate design and construction firms, as well as the necessity to allocate risk among various parties in terms of delayed or defective performance.

With an EPC agreement in place, the contractor is essentially tasked with designing the renewable energy project, procuring the materials necessary to build the structure, and then actually building it. While, in practice, it is not uncommon for an EPC contractor to hire one or more subcontractors to carry out certain construction works, the EPC contractor will remain directly liable to the project company for ultimate performance.

EPC Agreements vs. Fragmented Structures

A main advantage of an EPC agreement over a fragmented structure—where there are separate design, supply, and construction agreements—is its attractiveness to commercial lenders. In traditional limited recourse financing, lenders will be looking for guarantees that the project will be operational, and therefore generating revenue, within prescribed timelines. Since the EPC structure usually includes performance guarantees, such as a guaranteed minimum output capacity, it is generally considered as preferable to separate agreements where no single contractor will be able to provide such guarantees.

The contractual framework for the development of a renewable energy project will be as unique to that project as its technical aspects. It is not strictly necessary for developers to engage a single contractor to engineer, procure, and construct the facilities. Many developers of large-scale private sector wind and solar farms have inhouse engineering capabilities, as well as a network of global supply chains which can provide wind turbines or photovoltaic panels. Some developers will therefore choose to procure the necessary equipment from their own suppliers and engage design and construction firms separately.

In the case of dedicated biomass projects, one of the main technical considerations is the supplier of the boiler or combustor. Since this is a highly specified technical aspect of a biomass project, which will have a significant impact on the overall performance of the power plant, developers often procure the boiler themselves. If an EPC structure is used for the design and construction of a dedicated biomass power plant, meaning that the EPC contractor is willing to accept the technological risk associated with procuring the boiler, developers and project lenders frequently require a list of approved suppliers of the boiler to be included in the EPC agreement.

Key Provisions of EPC Agreements

There are a number of key provisions in an EPC agreement for a renewable energy project. The sponsor should obtain a security or performance bond for a certain percentage of the contract price from the contractor, to be called upon in the event of nonperformance or inadequate performance. The amount, form, and issuer of the bond should be considered. The timing and amount of liquidated damages, either in relation to delayed construction or inadequate performance, should be devised. It is important to draft these clauses precisely in order to clearly identify under what circumstances the liquidated damages must be paid and ensure that they are not excessive in the circumstances.

For solar and wind power projects, it is important to properly consider aspects of output measurement. Unlike power plant projects, which rely on steady sources of fuel such as biomass, wind and solar power plants rely on freely available fuel supplies. The EPC contractor must take notice of the testing regime provisions and ensure that these provisions coincide with the related clauses of the power purchase agreement between the project company and the offtaker.

Split Agreements

A variation of the standard EPC agreement is the “split agreement.” Many EPC contracts in the renewable sector contain both offshore and onshore agreements, whereby the design and procurement phases of the EPC contractor’s work take place offshore. The onshore company, which carries out the construction work, can either be an affiliate, a joint-venture company in which the offshore EPC contractor has a stake, or an unrelated third-party construction firm which has entered into a consortium with the offshore contractor to complete the renewable energy project.

In renewable energy projects where the offshore and onshore works are to be split, the drafters of the EPC agreements must be mindful of the division of responsibilities between the offshore and onshore contractors. The sponsors of the project should ensure that both the offshore and onshore contractors agree to be held jointly liable for any damages that result from delayed or defective performance. The division of tasks should be clearly outlined in the offshore and onshore agreements. The liquidated damages clauses should reflect the commercial bargain. If construction is stalled because of a delayed shipment, or if the power facility is not capable of generating the rated capacity, the offshore and onshore agreements should clearly stipulate how much the sponsor or project company is entitled to claim.

Given the scale of many renewable energy projects, as well as the financial sums involved, it is vital that the contractual structure for the design and construction of the facilities is properly considered, negotiated, understood, and agreed upon between the parties.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 27, 2025
Thailand’s Ministry of Energy (MOE) has announced the launch of the 25th bidding round for petroleum exploration and production. This round offers nine greenfield onshore blocks—seven in northeastern Thailand and two in central Thailand—encompassing over 33,000 km². The bids can be submitted from July 1 to July 16, 2025. The sizes and locations of these blocks are: Northeast Thailand Block L1/66: 3,223.51 km² (Khon Kaen, Nong Bua Lam Phu, Udon Thani) Block L2/66: 3,917.03 km² (Kalasin, Sakon Nakhon, Udon Thani) Block L3/66: 3,918.22 km² (Kalasin, Khon Kaen, Maha Sarakham, Udon Thani) Block L4/66: 3,656.65 km² (Amnat Charoen, Mukdahan, Nakhon Phanom, Yasothon) Block L5/66: 3,436.01 km² (Chaiyaphum, Khon Kaen, Nakhon Ratchasima) Block L7/66: 3,438.51 km² (Buri Ram, Maha Sarakham, Nakhon Ratchasima, Roi Et, Surin, Khon Kaen) Block L9/66: 3,885.44 km² (Nakhon Ratchasima) Central Thailand Block L6/66: 3,966.86 km² (Chaiyaphum, Lop Buri, Phetchabun) Block L8/66: 3,957.41 km² (Kanchanaburi, Nakhon Pathom, Ratchaburi, Suphan Buri) Bidding Process Interested companies must submit their bids to the Department of Mineral Fuels (DMF) between July 1 and July 16, 2025. Bids should include: Application form (ChorThor/Por1) Proof of eligibility: Corporate documentation, audited financial statements, and proof of resources Technical and commercial proposals: Exploration plans, geological surveys, financial and work commitments, and special benefits such as signing bonuses of at least USD 100,000. There is a nonrefundable THB 50,000 application fee per block, and applicants must provide a bid bond of THB 3 million per block via an unconditional bank guarantee from a commercial bank with branches in Thailand, valid for at least one year from the bidding submission date. The guarantee will be returned to unsuccessful bidders upon request and to successful bidders upon the signing of the concession agreement. Eligibility Bidders must meet the following main eligibility criteria: Bidders must be limited companies with the following qualifications: The company must have the objective of
January 23, 2025
In 2023, compliance inspections by Vietnam’s Government Inspectorate identified several violations of policies and laws in the management and implementation of planning and investment in renewable energy projects. Since then, many renewable energy enterprises and projects have encountered significant operational challenges. In December 2024, the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) issued two reports, Report 321/BC-BCT and Report 345/BC-BCT, to implement the 2023 Inspection Conclusion of the Government Inspectorate and address obstacles faced by renewable energy enterprises, Investors in renewable energy projects in Vietnam should carefully consider the potential impacts of proposed solutions in these reports. The reports re-emphasize the types of violations related to renewable energy projects identified in the Inspection Conclusion, with a significant expansion in the number of affected projects. Key violations include: (i) misapplication of FIT (feed-in tariff) incentives; (ii) recognition of COD (commercial operation date) and receipt of FIT prices without written approval of construction acceptance; (iii) overlap with mineral planning, irrigation planning, national defense land use, or other restricted land uses; (iv) incomplete land procedures and documentation; and (v) installation of rooftop solar on agricultural and forestry land used for farming and aquaculture models. Further, these reports mention the government’s solutions to resolve difficulties for renewable energy projects, which include: Allowing additional planning where projects do not violate national security. Allowing rectification of projects’ violations in land and construction process as per law. For projects violating planning on minerals, irrigation, or defense, socio-economic efficiency will be assessed for adjustments or integration. Adjusting electricity prices and recovering incorrect FIT prices for projects not meeting conditions. Requiring rooftop solar projects on non-farming land to comply with regulations or, if land violations occur, FIT prices will be revoked, and electricity prices must be redetermined and recovered. For items (iv) and (v), the authority will issue regulations
January 14, 2025
Thailand’s Department of Industrial Works (DIW) has issued a new regulation (Ministerial Regulation Re: Designation of Type, Kind, and Size of Factories (No. 3) B.E. 2567 (2024)), which removes the factory license requirement for electricity generation from solar energy installations on rooftops, roof decks, or any part of a building used for residential or other purposes, regardless of capacity. The new rules took effect on December 28, 2024. Under the previous regulations, solar rooftop installations had to seek approval from the DIW if their capacity exceeded 1,000 kW (1 MW), which added time and administrative costs when adopting renewable energy solutions. Benefits and Further Compliance The updated regulation benefits industrial operators by facilitating faster installation times and lower costs, as solar rooftops can now be installed without the need for prior approval of a factory license from the DIW. Operators can now more easily contribute to environmental sustainability and carbon reduction efforts. Despite the lifting of the factory licensing requirement, other compliance obligations, such as an energy business license (or exemption from an energy business license), a controlled energy production license, and a construction permit, may still apply. Reason for the Change Removing the classification of rooftop or building-installed solar power plants as factories aligns with Thailand’s renewable energy goals and reduces regulatory burdens for industrial operators. Additionally, it supports the achievement of energy policies aligned with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and Thailand’s international commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the participation of all sectors. For further details on how this change affects business operations or to explore strategies for renewable energy implementation, please contact Supasit Boonsanong at [email protected], Charuwan Charoonchitsathian at [email protected], or Phareeya Yongpanich at [email protected].
December 4, 2024
Thailand Legal Basics, a valuable primer for foreign investors, explores all aspects of living and doing business in Thailand. Written by specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok, it is the only comprehensive English-language guide to the Thai legal system with a focus on the concerns of foreign business and investment.