You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2016

EPC Agreements: Devising a Sound Contractual Framework for Renewable Energy Projects

Informed Counsel

The development of a renewable energy project requires, among a range of factors, engineers to design the facility, state-of-the-art equipment, and a reliable construction firm to implement the project. A key factor in a renewable energy project’s long-term success is devising an appropriate contractual framework to construct the facilities. This is a particularly important consideration, given the scale of many renewable energy projects and the financial sums at stake.  

An engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreement provides a contractual framework whereby a contractor agrees to engineer, procure, and construct a specified structure. It is often referred to as a “turnkey” agreement, since it requires the sponsor or project company to simply “turn a key” to commence operations of the constructed facility.

Advantages of the EPC Structure

From a project sponsor’s perspective, a main benefit of having an EPC agreement in place is that it provides a single point of contact and responsibility for the development of a particular project. For a project company, this avoids both the logistical confusion of coordinating among separate design and construction firms, as well as the necessity to allocate risk among various parties in terms of delayed or defective performance.

With an EPC agreement in place, the contractor is essentially tasked with designing the renewable energy project, procuring the materials necessary to build the structure, and then actually building it. While, in practice, it is not uncommon for an EPC contractor to hire one or more subcontractors to carry out certain construction works, the EPC contractor will remain directly liable to the project company for ultimate performance.

EPC Agreements vs. Fragmented Structures

A main advantage of an EPC agreement over a fragmented structure—where there are separate design, supply, and construction agreements—is its attractiveness to commercial lenders. In traditional limited recourse financing, lenders will be looking for guarantees that the project will be operational, and therefore generating revenue, within prescribed timelines. Since the EPC structure usually includes performance guarantees, such as a guaranteed minimum output capacity, it is generally considered as preferable to separate agreements where no single contractor will be able to provide such guarantees.

The contractual framework for the development of a renewable energy project will be as unique to that project as its technical aspects. It is not strictly necessary for developers to engage a single contractor to engineer, procure, and construct the facilities. Many developers of large-scale private sector wind and solar farms have inhouse engineering capabilities, as well as a network of global supply chains which can provide wind turbines or photovoltaic panels. Some developers will therefore choose to procure the necessary equipment from their own suppliers and engage design and construction firms separately.

In the case of dedicated biomass projects, one of the main technical considerations is the supplier of the boiler or combustor. Since this is a highly specified technical aspect of a biomass project, which will have a significant impact on the overall performance of the power plant, developers often procure the boiler themselves. If an EPC structure is used for the design and construction of a dedicated biomass power plant, meaning that the EPC contractor is willing to accept the technological risk associated with procuring the boiler, developers and project lenders frequently require a list of approved suppliers of the boiler to be included in the EPC agreement.

Key Provisions of EPC Agreements

There are a number of key provisions in an EPC agreement for a renewable energy project. The sponsor should obtain a security or performance bond for a certain percentage of the contract price from the contractor, to be called upon in the event of nonperformance or inadequate performance. The amount, form, and issuer of the bond should be considered. The timing and amount of liquidated damages, either in relation to delayed construction or inadequate performance, should be devised. It is important to draft these clauses precisely in order to clearly identify under what circumstances the liquidated damages must be paid and ensure that they are not excessive in the circumstances.

For solar and wind power projects, it is important to properly consider aspects of output measurement. Unlike power plant projects, which rely on steady sources of fuel such as biomass, wind and solar power plants rely on freely available fuel supplies. The EPC contractor must take notice of the testing regime provisions and ensure that these provisions coincide with the related clauses of the power purchase agreement between the project company and the offtaker.

Split Agreements

A variation of the standard EPC agreement is the “split agreement.” Many EPC contracts in the renewable sector contain both offshore and onshore agreements, whereby the design and procurement phases of the EPC contractor’s work take place offshore. The onshore company, which carries out the construction work, can either be an affiliate, a joint-venture company in which the offshore EPC contractor has a stake, or an unrelated third-party construction firm which has entered into a consortium with the offshore contractor to complete the renewable energy project.

In renewable energy projects where the offshore and onshore works are to be split, the drafters of the EPC agreements must be mindful of the division of responsibilities between the offshore and onshore contractors. The sponsors of the project should ensure that both the offshore and onshore contractors agree to be held jointly liable for any damages that result from delayed or defective performance. The division of tasks should be clearly outlined in the offshore and onshore agreements. The liquidated damages clauses should reflect the commercial bargain. If construction is stalled because of a delayed shipment, or if the power facility is not capable of generating the rated capacity, the offshore and onshore agreements should clearly stipulate how much the sponsor or project company is entitled to claim.

Given the scale of many renewable energy projects, as well as the financial sums involved, it is vital that the contractual structure for the design and construction of the facilities is properly considered, negotiated, understood, and agreed upon between the parties.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 2, 2022
The Ministry of Energy is preparing to open a bidding round for the right to explore and produce petroleum in three offshore exploration blocks in the Gulf of Thailand: Exploration Block Nos. G1/65, G2/65, and G3/65. Announced in April 2022 with an eye toward national energy sustainability and security, this is the first opportunity for exploration of new offshore areas in 15 years. The total area of the three exploration blocks is 35,164.01 square kilometers, and operations in the exploration blocks will be subject to the terms and conditions of the required production sharing contract (PSC). Under the PSC, the Thai government is entitled to receive royalty payments against profits, any applicable cost recovery, and profit petroleum. The government also has the authority to monitor the petroleum operations in collaboration with the successful bidder. On July 27, 2022, the Department of Mineral Fuels (DMF) held a conference for prospective investors in order to clarify general information regarding the petroleum bidding round. Currently, interested investors can request the right to enter the bidding-round data room located at the DMF by emailing [email protected] by September 2, 2022. To participate in the bidding round, interested investors must submit an application together with required documents to the DMF during the period of September 5–16, 2022. For further information on the bidding round, or on any aspect of energy law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected] or +66 2056 5555.
February 28, 2022
On February 9, 2022, the Director-General of the Department of Mineral Fuels (DMF) stated that the DMF is planning to request that the Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister of Energy sign an invitation to open bids for Petroleum Exploration and Production Licenses in the Gulf of Thailand for the first time in 15 years. The DMF’s Chief Department expects that this auction, which will cover three offshore areas, could increase Thailand’s petroleum reserves, and it could lead to the possible discovery of new sources of petroleum for Thailand, which would boost the country’s energy resources, and reduce losses from energy imports. The plots in the Gulf of Thailand that will be auctioned in the 24th bid round are as follows: Plot No. G1/65 with a total area of 8,487 square kilometers. This area is divided into 2 sub-areas: Area A totaling 8,298.49 square kilometers, and Area B totaling 188.71 square kilometers; Plot G2/65 with a total area of 15,030 square kilometers; and Plot No. G3/65 with a total area of 11,646.67 square kilometers. This area is divided into 2 sub-areas: Area A totaling 11,028.22 square kilometers, and Area B totaling 618.45 square kilometers. Generally, Thailand initiates its concession and production sharing contract process with the announcement of an exploration area or a plot in the Government Gazette. Thereafter, the DMF Committee will consider and announce the invitation, so that private sector firms can submit their applications to receive respective rights. The DMF’s sub-committee will consider the applications by: checking the qualifications stipulated under Section 24 of the Petroleum Act; assessing the suitability of the exploration project; and determining the benefits which are offered by the applicant. After considering the requests, the DMF’s sub-committee will consider the petroleum laws and regulations, before submitting the matter to the Petroleum Committee—under
February 22, 2022
The many new and unique challenges in recent years—from epidemics, to travel restrictions, to supply chain disruptions and energy-related reactions to all of the above, we have all had to adjust to a new status quo. The energy industry has felt these impacts acutely, and as the industry seeks to meet the current challenges and move forward toward a more sustainable future, it is helpful to take stock of where things stand and where they might be headed in the coming years. In the midst of this uncertainty, Energy Law in Southeast Asia by the Tilleke & Gibbins Energy Industry Team seeks to provide clarity on the legal and regulatory environment surrounding energy industry activities. Each chapter of Energy Law in Southeast Asia takes the reader through the essential information surrounding energy and environmental regulations in general and the specific laws and practices for the major areas of energy projects—both in terms of the current energy mix and the sources taking on a larger role as we transition toward a lower-carbon future. These chapter subsections are: Regulatory Structure Oil and Gas Coal Solar Wind Hydropower Biomass and Biogas Environmental Regulations In providing this legal overview of major areas across the spectrum of energy projects in Southeast Asia, we have sought to create a resource for all involved in the energy industry, regardless of their specific area of interest or the different obstacles or challenges they seek to resolve. Energy Law in Southeast Asia is written by specialists on Tilleke & Gibbins’ Energy Industry Team, who together have over 200 years of accumulated energy experience. Spread throughout Tilleke & Gibbins’ offices in Southeast Asia, they function both as an integrated regional team to advise multinational enterprises on their regional energy project portfolios, and as experts for investors and companies looking
January 27, 2022
The Energy Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) has launched a pilot project to study the energy consumption and the economic, social, and environmental impact of electric motorcycle taxis, as well as the behavior of drivers and passengers. The project, which was launched on December 27, 2021, as part of EGAT’s Carbon Neutrality Policy, will continue for a year, after which EGAT will consider the data and decide whether electric motorcycle taxis should be introduced nationwide. EGAT is also currently encouraging the use of electric bikes within their own organization, and they initially expect this to help reduce annual carbon dioxide emissions by 37 tons and prevent the release of about 838,000 milligrams of dust per year. EGAT expects additional significant reductions from electric motorcycle taxi pilot projects in multiple locations. A study conducted in Kenya in 2015 by that country’s energy regulator found that sub-150cc motorcycles emit approximately 46.5 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometer, and these emissions increase proportionally in accordance with engine size. According to Thailand’s Office of Industrial Economics, citing data collected by the Federation of Thai Industries Automotive Industry Group, a total of 1,516,096 motorcycles were sold in Thailand in 2020—a surprisingly robust figure in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that public motorcycles travel an average of 15,000 kilometers per year, each motorcycle is therefore producing approximately 0.7 tons of carbon dioxide per year. If Thailand is able to change 50% of its yearly sales of standard motorcycle to electric motorcycles, annual carbon dioxide emissions could decrease by approximately 530,000 tons. Furthermore, since 28.8% of carbon dioxide emissions in Thailand are generated from the transport sector, the transition to electric mobility vehicles looks to be one of the most promising solutions for lowering carbon dioxide emissions in the country. Considering developments