You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 4, 2017

Engineering, Procurement, and Construction: Considerations for Foreign Companies Working on Projects in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

The pace of Thailand’s infrastructure development has continued to grow in the past few years, bringing numerous opportunities for engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) firms based overseas that are looking for ways to participate in a project in Thailand. However, potential investors will need to have a solid understanding of the country’s legal and regulatory framework prior to investing significant time, energy, and capital.

The most significant law relating to the participation of foreigners in business activities in Thailand is the Foreign Business Act, B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). List 3 of the FBA restricts a number of activities which engineering and construction firms will likely engage in, such as architectural, engineering, and construction services, as well as wholesale or retail trading with registered capital under THB 100 million and other ancillary services. A company that has half or more of its shares held by non-Thais will be deemed as “foreign” under the FBA and thus subject to its restrictions.

Foreign companies and foreign majority-owned Thai companies wishing to engage in these activities in Thailand must first obtain a foreign business license or foreign business certificate from the Department of Business Development, Ministry of Commerce. Importantly, each business line will be treated separately for the purposes of assessing compliance under the FBA. A company that has been granted a foreign business license to conduct architectural services, for example, is not automatically permitted to conduct engineering services or construction activities.

Foreign companies must also be aware of professional licensing requirements. Engineering services and architectural services are both licensed activities in Thailand, meaning companies who regularly engage in such services are required to comply with the regulations of the Council of Engineers and the Architect Council of Thailand, respectively. To become registered and licensed at either Council, a company must have Thai-licensed engineers or architects sitting on its board of directors. Foreigners are prohibited from working as engineers or architects in Thailand, meaning a company wishing to engage in engineering, architecture and/or construction projects will need to engage Thai engineers and/or architects. Engaging in such services without obtaining the proper license shall result in a fine and imprisonment.

Another issue is that a foreign-incorporated company may not send non-Thai citizens to work in Thailand without first obtaining a foreign business license. Even after such license has been granted, a common misconception, especially among foreign professionals whose citizenship permits them visa-free travel to Thailand, is that they are permitted to perform business-related activities on a short-term basis provided they indicate that their purpose of travel is “business” when arriving at their port of entry. In reality, foreign nationals are required to obtain work permits after arriving in Thailand prior to engaging in any work. Penalties for not obtaining such work permits include severe fines, imprisonment, and/or summary deportation and blacklisting. This is an important point to consider for offshore contractors intending to deploy employees to perform site visits in Thailand.

A common feature of multinational engineering firms that conduct EPC activities in Thai projects is the “split” contract. Typically, the EPC activities will be divided into two or more contracts, with a wrap-around agreement signed by all parties to ensure joint liability of contractors. Often, engineering and procurement activities will be performed by an offshore contractor, while the onshore contractor will be responsible for construction and commissioning. When utilizing this structure, the onshore contractor must have obtained a foreign business license or certificate to perform construction work. Moreover, if the onshore contractor has not obtained an engineering license in its own name, it will need to retain a licensed Thai subcontractor to approve engineering schematics.

A foreign engineering contractor may consider establishing a Thai subsidiary and applying for investment promotion from the Board of Investment to establish a Trade and Investment Support Office (TISO), which will allow it to engage in support services, including onshore activities, with certain exceptions, such as civil engineering and architectural services. In case a TISO-promoted company is established with foreign majority ownership, a foreign business certificate will be required.

A Ministerial Regulation was adopted by the Ministry of Commerce with respect to the FBA on May 26, 2017, and outlines a number of service businesses which no longer require a foreign business license under List 3(21) of the FBA, including some services provided by parties who contract with government agencies or state-owned entities. However, this exception does not apply to engineering services, architectural services, or construction.

In conclusion, foreign EPC contractors are able to participate in projects in Thailand, provided they abide by certain licensing requirements and have a clear understanding of the regulatory framework. Much like engineering schematics, it is important to ensure that contractual structures are properly devised at the outset of any project. While the regulatory framework for foreign EPC contractors is presently complex, it will be interesting to observe whether the government takes any action to streamline the approval processes to achieve its national infrastructure development objectives.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 8, 2021
On March 24, 2021, the Prime Minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 12/2021/QD-TTg issuing regulations on oil spill response. One of the more notable changes is the introduction of templates for oil spill response plans.
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many