You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 30, 2019

Employers Brace Themselves as New Personal Data Protection Act Looms

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post: Human Resources Watch

The draft Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) was approved by the National Legislative Assembly in February 2019, raising concern among business entities over the the need for increased diligence to ensure adherence to the provisions. Running a business often entails handling the personal data of employees, contractors, suppliers, customers, and others. Any personal data collected could be subject to the provisions of the PDPA, and as employee data falls under the PDPA, all businesses, should be prepare to deal with the impact of the PDPA.

Although this final version of the PDPA has not yet been endorsed by the king and published in the Government Gazette, the endorsement and publication is expected soon.

The majority of the provisions in the PDPA will only come into force a year after its publication in the Government Gazette. This transitional period will allow any entity subject to the PDPA to review and adjust their personal data–related activities.

What is Personal Data?

Personal data is broadly defined as any data about a person that enables the identification of that person, whether directly or indirectly, but specifically excluding data of the deceased. This can include a person’s name, identification card number, email address, mobile phone number, health information, payroll information, or bank account number. 

Data Controller or Data Processor?

The PDPA sets out different duties and obligations for a data controller and a data processor. A data controller is defined as any person or legal entity that has the power and duty to make decisions on whether to collect, use, or disclose personal data. In contrast, a data processor is defined as any person or legal entity that collects, uses, or discloses personal data on behalf of, or pursuant to, the instructions of the data controller. Since employers have the power to determine which categories of personal data should be collected and retained, they are therefore acting as data controllers.

Obtaining Consent

Collection, use, or disclosure of personal data is generally prohibited unless consent from the data subject has been obtained or unless it falls within an exemption prescribed under the PDPA.  The exemptions include, among others, when it is necessary to comply with a contract to which the data subject is a party, or pursuant to the requests of the data subject prior to entering into a contract; and when it is necessary for the legitimate interest of the data controller, other person, or other entity, unless such interest is less significant that the fundamental right of the data subject.

Employers, therefore, should carefully consider whether separate consent must be obtained from their employees or the language of the employment agreement is sufficient for the purpose of possessing their employees’ personal data in compliance with the PDPA.

If separate consent is required, such a request must

  1. be made prior to, or at, the time of collection;
  2. be made in writing or via electronic means;
  3. be clearly separated from other terms;
  4. be in an easily accessible format or use terms which are understandable;
  5. be written in plain language; and
  6. not be misleading or deceptive.

The PDPA, however, does not specifically require that the consent must be made in Thai language.

Sensitive Personal Data

Most companies require their employees to provide information relating to their health, race, religion, or biometric data (e.g., fingerprints). These categories of personal data are considered as sensitive personal data. The PDPA expressly prohibits the collection of such data unless explicit consent from the data subject has been obtained, or unless otherwise exempted.

One of the exemptions is where the sensitive personal data is collected for labour protection, social security, or national health security purposes, and it is deemed as necessary for the data controller or data subject to satisfy his or her rights or obligations.

It is still unclear whether collecting sensitive personal data of employees would fall within the scope of this exemption. Hence, employers should closely observe the PDPA and its subordinate regulations once they come into force.

Use of Personal Data

Personal data can only be used for the purposes for which the consent has been granted. Therefore, if the purpose of use has changed, fresh consent from the employee must be obtained.

Retention Period

Where a request for consent is required, the employer must inform employees about the period for which their personal data will be retained.

As the longest prescription period for various labour disputes, including unfair termination, is ten years from the date the claim could be enforced, employers should consider retaining their employees’ personal data until the period of prescription expires. Regardless of the length of the retention period that the employer ultimately chooses, they must ensure that this retention period is clearly communicated to the employees.

Cross-border Transfer

Companies often transfer employees’ personal data within their group of companies, some of which might be located overseas. If such transfer complies with the company’s internal policy for sharing personal data in accordance with the requirements of the PDPA, it would be exempt from the general PDPA requirement for transferring data international—i.e the employer would not need to ensure that the destination country implements an appropriate standard for personal data protection, or obtain further consent. Whether or not an internal policy renders such a transfer exempt is likely to be a matter of some dispute, and companies wishing to transfer data internationally should be particularly cautious about this exemption.

Grandfather Provision

As for employees’ personal data that has been collected prior to the PDPA coming into effect, employers may continue to use this data without the need to obtain consent, provided such data is used solely for the purpose for which it was originally collected, and that the employer complies with the PDPA when doing so.

Rights of the Data Subject

Employers should ensure that their employees have been clearly informed of their rights under the PDPA, including, but not limited to, right of access, right to data portability, right to withdraw consent, and right to erasure.

Other Obligations

Under the PDPA, the employer, as the data controller, has an obligation to ensure that any other person or entity to whom the personal data is disclosed will not use or disclose such personal data unlawfully or without authorization.

Data processors are also required to implement appropriate security measures to prevent access that would enable the use, alteration, amendment, or disclosure of the personal data unlawfully or without authorization. Therefore, where there are inappropriate security measures, it may prove difficult for an employer to escape liability in the event of a data breach.

Penalties

Non-compliance with the PDPA could lead to severe civil liabilities, administrative liabilities, and criminal penalties—the latter two including fines of up to THB 5 million, and even imprisonment.

How Should Employers Prepare?

  • Review current personal data protection policies, employment contracts, and work rules to ensure the terms will be compliant with the PDPA (and any other relevant laws). 
  • Review agreements with customers, contractors, suppliers, and any other related parties.
  • Ensure that an appropriate, PDPA-compliant system for personal data protection is in place.
  • Identify categories of personal data that are required for a business’s legitimate purposes, and only collect and retain such data.
  • Provide personal data protection training for employees.

It is essential that all employers closely observe and adhere to the PDPA and subordinate regulations once they come into force, and prepare themselves well in advance, in order to ensure their employee personal data–related activities do not violate any applicable laws. Those who fail to do so could find themselves faced with angry employees and severe penalties.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post on April 29, 2019, and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original can be viewed on the Bangkok Post website, or by downloading the pdf below.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 13, 2021
With COVID-19 cases continuing to pose a significant threat throughout Thailand, many employers have ordered their employees to work exclusively from home in order to minimize their chances of contracting the virus. However, this luxury is not afforded to all employees—some are unable to work from home due to the nature of their work, and consequently they are placed in the precarious position of being exposed to possible infection. Thailand’s Social Security Office (SSO) understood these risks early in the pandemic and, in March 2020, issued guidelines through the Workmen’s Compensation Fund Office on employees’ entitlement to claim benefits from the workers’ compensation fund (WCF) if they contract the virus as a result of their work. The WCF provides medical-related assistance and compensation to employees who directly suffer from a work-related injury or sickness (subject to certain conditions). Falling ill with COVID-19 during the performance of work duties may constitute suffering work-related sickness, thereby allowing employees to claim compensation from the WCF by submitting the Kor Thor 16 form, a medical certificate, treatment records, records of the employee’s working hours, and other relevant documentation. Upon receiving a claim, the SSO will investigate by collecting facts and evidence from the employer, the infected employee and his or her colleagues, and any witnesses. The official will examine the employee’s duties and working conditions in detail, taking into consideration any relevant information, such as evidence regarding the employee’s travel or movements prior to falling sick. Once all the facts and evidence are gathered, the matter will be submitted to a medical subcommittee responsible for determining whether the employee’s onset of COVID-19 is due to his or her work. If the subcommittee finds that the employee’s contraction of the virus did indeed result from the performance of his or her work duties, the
Read More
August 26, 2021
Around the world, COVID-19 is continuing to threaten the health of millions, interrupt daily life, and throttle business activity. In Thailand, the latest wave of infections has been more intense than any since the beginning of the pandemic, and many businesses have been forced to close down once again. There are reasons for hope though—chief among them the increasing pace of vaccinations. Not only are the vaccines effective at preventing serious health issues, they are helping keep both employees and customers safe in business settings so that commerce, trade, and tourism can resume once again. Many in Thailand have already been vaccinated, and struggling employers are looking ahead to safely resuming full business activities, from reopening offices for employees who have been working from home, to welcoming customers and clients back to an environment that minimizes the risk of COVID-19 exposure. In anticipation of such a return to business at full capacity, many Thai employers are taking note of companies and organizations overseas boosting COVID-19 safety in workplaces by mandating vaccines and other measures, and asking whether such mandates could be imposed here in Thailand. The main legal concept to consider here is the provision in the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998), which authorizes employers to issue “lawful and just” orders to employees. For an order to be “lawful and just,” it must be proportionate to the circumstance. In the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers can refer to the Communicable Diseases Act B.E. 2558 (2015), as well as other local regulations, to provide grounds when asserting that their risk-mitigation orders are proportionate, lawful, and just. It is doubtful that a Thai court would rule that the circumstances we find ourselves in now would justify an employer requiring employees to be vaccinated, but this legal standard can
Read More
August 25, 2021
Multilaw has published the latest edition of How to Hire and Fire, a guide to the rules and regulations governing employment relationships in over 90 jurisdictions around the world. Lawyers at Tilleke & Gibbins prepared the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters of the guide, which covers the following main topics: General principles: Forums for adjudicating employment disputes, main sources of employment law, employees working for foreign companies in Cambodia or abroad for domestic companies, and data privacy. Hiring the employee: Legal requirements for employment agreements, types of agreement, secrecy and confidentiality, ownership of inventions and other IP rights, pre-employment considerations, hiring of non-nationals, hiring specified categories of individuals, and outsourcing and sub-contracting. Maintaining the employment relationship: Changes to the contract, changes in business ownership, social security, accidents at work, discipline and grievances, harassment, discrimination, equal pay, compulsory training obligations, offsetting earnings, maternity and disability leave, insurance, absence for military or public service duties, trade unions, employee strikes, and employers’ liability for actions of employees. Firing the employee: Procedures for terminating employment agreements, instant dismissal, employee resignation, termination on notice, age-related termination, force majeure automatic termination, collective dismissals, termination by agreement, directors and senior officers, rules for companies facing financial difficulties, restriction of future activities, whistleblowers, garden leave, severance payments and tax considerations, allowances, and time limits for post-termination claims. General: Specific matters unique or important to each jurisdiction. Multilaw is a global network of carefully selected, independent law firms consisting of over 10,000 commercial lawyers in more than 100 countries, able to provide expert legal advice in complex environments around the globe. The full guide is available for free on the Multilaw website.
Read More