You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 11, 2020

Eight Tilleke & Gibbins Lawyers Ranked in WIPR Leaders 2020

World Intellectual Property Review

The recently published WIPR Leaders 2020, a handbook of the world’s best IP practitioners in patent, trademark, and copyright, has recognized eight Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers as among the best in their fields. The ranked lawyers include:

With three lawyers listed for Thailand and four for Vietnam, Tilleke & Gibbins has more ranked professionals than any other firm in both countries.

The firm’s lawyers were highlighted for their IP expertise across a wide range of sectors and industries, including chemicals, life sciences, media, pharmaceuticals, software, sports, technology, and tobacco.

The WIPR Leaders rankings are the culmination of a four-month research process that begins with peer nominations solicited from 12,000 IP professionals worldwide. WIPR researchers then evaluate the practice history, industry expertise, and notable cases of the nominees, as well as their contributions to IP education and advocacy, to select the top practitioners in more than 60 jurisdictions around the world. To learn more about the rankings, please visit the WIPR website.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 7, 2022
Tiziana Sucharitkul, managing partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ dispute resolution group, provided in-depth insights on diversity and inclusion and law firms for a recent article in Asia Business Law Journal (ABLJ) on diversity and inclusion in law firms across Asia. In the article, which was published on March 30, 2022, Tiziana offers insights gained in her years in senior leadership at Tilleke & Gibbins and as a longtime advocate for law firm diversity and inclusion initiatives. The article begins by contrasting the demand for greater diversity among Western law firms—especially by corporate counsel—with attitudes in Asia, where questions of expertise and service often take precedence when it comes to legal work. The writer then quickly shifts to investigating the reasons for this, as well as exploring the current state of diversity in the Asian legal industry today. This section of the article leads with Tiziana’s explanation that leadership of Asian law firms are in a very different context than the social tensions that catalyzed many diversity initiatives in the West. However, this does not necessarily mean that diverse representation has lagged in this part of the world. Rather, as Tiziana points out, “Southeast Asian countries have some of the highest proportions of women in senior business leadership in the world.” She also notes that markers such as gender diversity and respect for minority rights can vary widely across Asia. Elsewhere in the article, other senior law firm leaders express similar observations and provide details on the diversity challenges in their countries of focus. For example, an expert on diversity in the Indian legal profession notes that local diversity concerns must also consider caste discrimination, and a partner at a global firm in Singapore speaks about the challenges of developing diversity policies that fit each local context. Tiziana
April 1, 2022
At the annual general meeting of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) on March 24, Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut, a partner in the firm’s corporate and commercial group in Bangkok, was elected as IPBA’s jurisdictional committee member for Thailand. In the role, Pimvimol will be responsible for membership issues in Thailand, and will be the key point of contact for matters concerning activities in the jurisdiction. She will serve as Thailand’s jurisdictional committee member for three years (2022–2025). The IPBA is a prestigious international association of business and commercial attorneys active or with a strong interest in the Pacific region. The IPBA has a membership of more than 1,500 legal professionals from over 65 countries and jurisdictions. Through its activities, the IPBA provides lawyers interested in the Asia-Pacific with opportunities to discuss legal, business, and policy issues affecting the region and grow in their legal practice through professional networking. For more information on the IPBA and its activities, please visit the IPBA website.
February 25, 2022
On February 24, Tilleke & Gibbins, in collaboration with the Thai Business Association of Myanmar and the Thai Business Association of the Lao PDR, delivered a Thai-language webinar titled “How to Export Cosmetics to Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, and Parallel Importation and Case Studies in Thailand.” The 90-minute session was led by a number of Tilleke & Gibbins’ regulatory affairs (RA) specialists: Atthachai Homhuan, director of the firm’s regulatory affairs (RA) group in Bangkok; Dino Santaniello, head of the Laos office; Ratchanee Sriplaek, RA consultant in Thailand; Saithong Rattana, associate in the Laos office; Thanathon Trakoolpolpruek, RA consultant in Thailand; and Yuwadee Thean-ngarm, director of the firm’s Myanmar office. Together, the speakers addressed the following issues: Compliance with cosmetics laws and regulations in Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar; Regulatory requirements for product labels and advertisements; Best practices and success stories related to exporting beauty products; Avoiding double importation; and Relevant case studies from Thailand. A recording of the webinar (in Thai) is available on the Tilleke & Gibbins YouTube channel.
December 2, 2021
Alan Adcock, partner and deputy director of intellectual property and regulatory affairs, recently joined fellow members of LAN, the Lifesciences Asia-Pacific Network, in a video podcast on digital health and telemedicine in the Asia-Pacific region. In Episode #10 of On the Pulse featuring LAN – Digital Health in Asia-Pacific, Alan (speaking on Thailand and Vietnam) and lawyers from CMS (China), Atsumi & Sakai (Japan), and Yulchon LLC (South Korea), discuss the following issues: a fragmented situation in APAC in terms of government policy and support for digital health initiatives a lack of a clear definition of “digital health” in most jurisdictions, and a mixed regulatory environment, with a need to update the laws in many jurisdictions how to deal with privacy concerns with the use of personal data with digital health technologies how to protect the intellectual property associated with digital health innovation developments in telemedicine in the APAC region and support for remote care and online consultations The video podcast is available to watch online, free of charge, here. An audio-only version is also available here.