You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 5, 2026

Eight New Decrees Shaping the Architecture of Vietnam’s International Financial Centers

Subscribe to Updates

Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 dated June 27, 2025, of the National Assembly of Vietnam (the “IFC Resolution” – see our previous article) set out the foundational legal framework for the establishment and development of Vietnam’s first-ever International Financial Centers (IFC). In furtherance of this framework, on December 18, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued eight implementing decrees to provide detailed regulatory guidance and to operationalize the IFC Resolution in practice.

The Eight Implementing Decrees: An Integrated Regulatory Ecosystem

The new decrees governing the IFC include the following:

  1. Decree No. 323/2025/ND-CP on the establishment of the IFC.
  2. Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP on financial policies applicable within the IFC.
  3. Decree No. 325/2025/ND-CP on labor, employment, and social security within the IFC.
  4. Decree No. 326/2025/ND-CP on land and environmental matters within the IFC.
  5. Decree No. 327/2025/ND-CP on entry, exit, and residence of foreign nationals in the IFC.
  6. Decree No. 328/2025/ND-CP on the International Arbitration Center of the IFC.
  7. Decree No. 329/2025/ND-CP on banking licensing, foreign exchange management, and anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) within the IFC.
  8. Decree No. 330/2025/ND-CP on the establishment and operation of commodity exchanges within the IFC.

Taken as a whole, these eight decrees translate the IFC Resolution into a coherent and fully operational legal regime governing the establishment, organization, and functioning of Vietnam’s IFC. Collectively, they demonstrate that Vietnam’s IFC framework is best understood not as a collection of isolated incentives, but as a deliberately designed and integrated regulatory system.

The Legal Architecture of the IFC: Four Interlocking Pillars

Read together, the decrees seem to be designed to address four core regulatory questions from the outset: (i) what the IFC is, from a legal and institutional perspective; (ii) who may participate in the IFC and what activities are permitted; (iii) how people, capital, and projects operate on a day-to-day basis within the IFC; and (iv) how disputes are resolved, with a level of legal certainty sufficient for cross-border and international transactions.

Viewed through this lens, the eight decrees collectively form four interlocking pillars, including (i) institutional foundations; (ii) market and financial regulation; (iii) operational enablement, and (iv) dispute resolution and enforcement. Each pillar performs a distinct regulatory function, and together they create the structural coherence necessary for the IFC to operate as a stable, transparent, and investable system.

Pillar 1: Institutional Foundation and Scope of Activities

At the core of the IFC regime is Decree 323, which establishes the Vietnam IFC as one integrated system with two locations, namely:

  • Ho Chi Minh City, positioned as a comprehensive international financial center, focusing on traditional and specialized financial services; and
  • Da Nang, oriented toward innovation-driven and emerging financial activities.

Crucially, Decree 323 also introduces the IFC Operating Regulation and confirms the principle that, in the event of inconsistencies between the IFC regime and other laws (other than the Constitution), the IFC rules prevail.

Another significant feature of Decree 323 is the List of Priority Sectors, Products, and Services for Development in the IFC, set out in an annex, which defines the categories of activities that the IFC is intended to accommodate, promote, and regulate. Most notably, Section 4 of the annex provides a detailed and explicit catalogue of priority activities in fintech and financial innovation, including the provision of infrastructure and products related to digital assets and decentralized finance (DeFi). The scope of these priority activities also encompasses other emerging financial models such as asset tokenization, stablecoins, Web3-based applications, and regulatory technology (regtech).

Taken together, these elements define what the IFC is, i.e., a legally distinct regulatory space operating within Vietnam’s legal system, but subject to a specialized governance framework.

Pillar 2: Entry Requirements, Financial Policies, and Risk Control

Once the institutional foundations and scope of priority activities are established, the IFC framework turns to the questions of who may participate in the IFC and what financial policies and activities may be undertaken, together with the associated risk management and control mechanisms.

Decree 324 elaborates the financial, investment, and operational mechanisms applicable to entities operating within the IFC. An important aspect of this decree is the registration, recognition, and termination of IFC membership, which serves as the legal gateway for accessing the IFC’s special regulatory treatment. In addition, Decree 324 introduces a relatively open framework for tax and accounting policies within the IFC, including the application of international accounting standards (IAS/IFRS), and provides the legal basis for a wide range of financial services, from securities and insurance to fintech and equity crowdfunding. The decree also develops the sandbox mechanism for fintech and innovation-driven financial services, as initially provided under Article 24 of the IFC Resolution. The criteria, conditions, scope of application, and procedures for registration, assessment, and licensing of sandbox participation are expected to be further specified by the IFC Executive Council.

Matters relating to the licensing and operation of banks, capital flows, and financial safety are addressed in Decree 329. This decree establishes the legal framework for a system of IFC member banks operating with greater flexibility than under the domestic banking regime, particularly in foreign exchange transactions and cross-border activities, while maintaining stringent compliance and risk management requirements aligned with international standards. Further, all IFC members are subject to obligations on anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing, and counter-proliferation financing under this decree.

Complementing this, Decree 330 introduces a dedicated legal framework for the establishment and operation of commodity exchanges within the IFC. It permits the formation of commodity trading platforms and the trading of a wide range of derivative instruments, including futures, options, and other derivatives. It is worth noting that Decree 330 clarifies that the goods permitted to be traded via commodity exchanges under Article 13 of the IFC Resolution include not only traditional commodities, but also certain digital assets, specifically cultural and artistic products structured as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

Pillar 3: Operational Enablement and Human Capital

Beyond financial regulations, the IFC framework also addresses the practical conditions required for daily operation:

  • Decree 325 establishes a tailored labor and employment regime for the IFC, including flexibility in the recruitment and management of foreign professionals.
  • Decree 327 sets out special entry, exit, residence, and long-term stay arrangements for foreign investors, experts, and key personnel working in the IFC.
  • Decree 326 addresses land use and environmental matters, clarifying land allocation, land use rights, and environmental compliance for IFC projects.

These measures reflect a policy recognition that the IFC mechanism competes not only on tax or regulatory treatments, but also on ease of operation, availability of talent, and infrastructure readiness.

Pillar 4: Dispute Resolution

The final pillar concerns how disputes are resolved, an issue of particular importance for cross-border financial transactions.

Decree 328 establishes a specialized International Arbitration Center within the IFC. The decree permits, in defined circumstances, the application of foreign governing law and limits judicial intervention where parties have validly agreed to arbitration. This approach aligns dispute resolution within the IFC with international commercial expectations, while remaining embedded within Vietnam’s legal framework.

Outlook

The IFC Resolution and its eight implementing decrees mark a significant structural development in Vietnam’s financial regulatory landscape. Taken together, they establish a special legal foundation for the operation of the IFC and signal Vietnam’s intention to develop the IFC as a functioning, internationally oriented financial ecosystem, rather than a purely experimental or incentive-driven model.

At the same time, the framework reflects an expectation that implementation will be phased and adaptive. While the current decrees establish the core legal framework, further refinement through subordinate guidance and regulatory practice is anticipated as the IFC transitions from establishment to full operation. The breadth and internal coherence of the framework suggest that participation in the IFC will require careful structuring, ongoing compliance planning, and a clear understanding of how the IFC regime interacts with Vietnam’s general legal framework.

As the regime continues to evolve, market participants will need to closely monitor regulatory developments and supervisory approaches, and adopt a proactive and strategically informed legal approach to manage regulatory risk while positioning themselves to capture opportunities within Vietnam’s emerging international financial centers.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 30, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is accepting public comments until May 2, 2025, on three draft notifications that will institute an enhanced supervision scheme and impose additional requirements for systemically important retail payment system (SIRPS) operators to align with international standards and encourage open infrastructure and competition. The SIRPS operators will be determined by the BOT from the “designated payment system operators” under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017). SIRPS Designation The BOT will announce a list of payment system operators designated as SIRPS operators and thus subject to enhanced supervision. The BOT will evaluate whether the payment system operator should be deemed a SIRPS operator when it meets the criteria in either the BOT’s quantitative or qualitative assessments, which cover the following: Quantitative assessment: The payment system’s transaction values, market share, cross-border payment network scale and value, and settlement with other financial market infrastructure. Qualitative assessment: The payment system’s function as a part of the country’s payment system infrastructure, the significance of the system users’ roles in the payment services, the substitutability of the payment system, and the impact level on the public and users in the event of an emergency or system suspension. Supervision of SIRPS Business Operations SIRPS operators will be subject to heightened supervision in three areas, in addition to various BOT regulations on designated payment system supervision, as follows: Governance: SIRPS operators will be required to have a balanced board composition with an independent director and directors with varied expertise, establish subcommittees to assist the board in supervising the operator’s compliance with its policy and strategy, and have senior executives overseeing risk and technology security separately from the executives overseeing business operations. Risk management and security: SIRPS operators will be required to have comprehensive risk management to ensure system stability and security. This
Read More
April 28, 2025
In recent years, Vietnam has positioned itself among the leading countries in the world in terms of digital asset ownership and trading volume. This rapid adoption reflects the country’s growing digital economy and the increasing engagement of individuals and businesses in blockchain-based financial activities. Central to this growth are Resolution No. 57-NQ/TW of the Politburo dated December 22, 2024, on breakthroughs in science, technology, innovation, and national digital transformation with a vision to 2045 (“Resolution 57”) and Resolution No. 03/NQ-CP of the Government dated January 9, 2025, promulgating the Action Plan to Implement Resolution 57 (“Resolution 03”), which outline a flexible and innovative policy framework that embraces pilot programs for emerging technologies to lay the groundwork for Vietnam’s legislative framework concerning cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies. Regulatory clarity in terms of digital assets and blockchain technologies is now more critical than ever for businesses and investors. In light of this, Vietnam is currently in the process of introducing three key legal instruments, with drafts of the Law on Digital Technology Industry (“Draft DTI Law”), Resolution of the National Assembly on the Establishment of Regional and International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“Draft Financial Center Resolution”), and Resolution of the Government on the Pilot Implementation of Crypto Asset Markets in Vietnam (“Draft Crypto Pilot Resolution”) nearing promulgation. Current Regulatory Direction and Schedule Vietnam’s regulatory framework for crypto assets and blockchain has been in a developmental stage since 2017, focusing on directions, plans, and schedules rather than established regulations. In February 2024, under Decision No. 194/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) was assigned to draft a legal framework to either prohibit or regulate virtual assets and service providers by May 2025, signaling a clearer regulatory direction. In March 2025, Directive No. 05/CT-TTg of the Prime Minister directed the MOF
Read More
April 18, 2025
On April 12, 2025, Thailand published an amendment to the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes in the Government Gazette, with the regulation taking effect the following day. Drafts of the amendment had been shared in recent months, and the final amendment of the decree contains some additional key revisions, such as narrowing the business operators subject to the decree’s requirements, reducing operators’ obligations, and establishing collaboration between relevant stakeholders to tackle technology crime. These key revisions to the amendment are detailed below. Business operators subject to the decree: The business operators covered under the decree now include only payment service providers under the Payment System Act and digital asset operators under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. Digital platform services under the Royal Decree on Digital Platform Service Businesses That Are Subject to Prior Notification are no longer within the scope of the decree. Definition of technology crime: The final version of the amendment removed the expanded definition of technology crime that had been included in a previous draft, leaving the decree’s existing definition unchanged. Telecommunications provider obligations: Mobile and telecommunications service providers now have an obligation to monitor and screen for content that may be related to technology crime and suspend SIM cards when instructed to do so by the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC). Transaction and account suspension: The amendment removes the decree’s complex transaction suspension procedures and leaves room for business-specific regulators (e.g., Bank of Thailand, Securities and Exchange Commission, NBTC) to impose various technology crime suspension requirements on business operators under their supervision. The newly established Center for Prevention and Suppression of Technology Crimes can also notify financial institutions and business operators of names or digital asset wallet addresses that may be related to technology crime,
Read More
April 18, 2025
On April 12, 2025, Thailand issued an amended digital asset regulation that covers offshore digital asset businesses providing services on a cross-border basis to Thai users. These businesses will now be subject to the licensing requirements of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Business Operations B.E. 2561 (2018), which is supervised by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A digital asset business will be deemed as providing services in Thailand—and therefore subject to requirements under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Business Operations—if the business does any of the following: Displays content in Thai, either fully or partially; Is registered under a “.th,” or “.ไทย” domain, contains any name relating to Thailand, or uses a domain written in Thai characters; Allows or requires payments in Thai baht (THB) or receives payments through Thai bank accounts or e-wallets; Chooses Thai law to govern transactions or Thai courts to litigate any dispute; Pays online search engines to attract users in Thailand to its services; Has an office, establishment, or personnel in Thailand to support or assist users within the country; or Meets any other criteria specified by the SEC. To operate legally in Thailand, offshore operators meeting any of the above criteria will be required to incorporate a local company in Thailand in order to apply for a digital asset business license with the SEC.
Read More