You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 5, 2026

Eight New Decrees Shaping the Architecture of Vietnam’s International Financial Centers

Subscribe to Updates

Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 dated June 27, 2025, of the National Assembly of Vietnam (the “IFC Resolution” – see our previous article) set out the foundational legal framework for the establishment and development of Vietnam’s first-ever International Financial Centers (IFC). In furtherance of this framework, on December 18, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued eight implementing decrees to provide detailed regulatory guidance and to operationalize the IFC Resolution in practice.

The Eight Implementing Decrees: An Integrated Regulatory Ecosystem

The new decrees governing the IFC include the following:

  1. Decree No. 323/2025/ND-CP on the establishment of the IFC.
  2. Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP on financial policies applicable within the IFC.
  3. Decree No. 325/2025/ND-CP on labor, employment, and social security within the IFC.
  4. Decree No. 326/2025/ND-CP on land and environmental matters within the IFC.
  5. Decree No. 327/2025/ND-CP on entry, exit, and residence of foreign nationals in the IFC.
  6. Decree No. 328/2025/ND-CP on the International Arbitration Center of the IFC.
  7. Decree No. 329/2025/ND-CP on banking licensing, foreign exchange management, and anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) within the IFC.
  8. Decree No. 330/2025/ND-CP on the establishment and operation of commodity exchanges within the IFC.

Taken as a whole, these eight decrees translate the IFC Resolution into a coherent and fully operational legal regime governing the establishment, organization, and functioning of Vietnam’s IFC. Collectively, they demonstrate that Vietnam’s IFC framework is best understood not as a collection of isolated incentives, but as a deliberately designed and integrated regulatory system.

The Legal Architecture of the IFC: Four Interlocking Pillars

Read together, the decrees seem to be designed to address four core regulatory questions from the outset: (i) what the IFC is, from a legal and institutional perspective; (ii) who may participate in the IFC and what activities are permitted; (iii) how people, capital, and projects operate on a day-to-day basis within the IFC; and (iv) how disputes are resolved, with a level of legal certainty sufficient for cross-border and international transactions.

Viewed through this lens, the eight decrees collectively form four interlocking pillars, including (i) institutional foundations; (ii) market and financial regulation; (iii) operational enablement, and (iv) dispute resolution and enforcement. Each pillar performs a distinct regulatory function, and together they create the structural coherence necessary for the IFC to operate as a stable, transparent, and investable system.

Pillar 1: Institutional Foundation and Scope of Activities

At the core of the IFC regime is Decree 323, which establishes the Vietnam IFC as one integrated system with two locations, namely:

  • Ho Chi Minh City, positioned as a comprehensive international financial center, focusing on traditional and specialized financial services; and
  • Da Nang, oriented toward innovation-driven and emerging financial activities.

Crucially, Decree 323 also introduces the IFC Operating Regulation and confirms the principle that, in the event of inconsistencies between the IFC regime and other laws (other than the Constitution), the IFC rules prevail.

Another significant feature of Decree 323 is the List of Priority Sectors, Products, and Services for Development in the IFC, set out in an annex, which defines the categories of activities that the IFC is intended to accommodate, promote, and regulate. Most notably, Section 4 of the annex provides a detailed and explicit catalogue of priority activities in fintech and financial innovation, including the provision of infrastructure and products related to digital assets and decentralized finance (DeFi). The scope of these priority activities also encompasses other emerging financial models such as asset tokenization, stablecoins, Web3-based applications, and regulatory technology (regtech).

Taken together, these elements define what the IFC is, i.e., a legally distinct regulatory space operating within Vietnam’s legal system, but subject to a specialized governance framework.

Pillar 2: Entry Requirements, Financial Policies, and Risk Control

Once the institutional foundations and scope of priority activities are established, the IFC framework turns to the questions of who may participate in the IFC and what financial policies and activities may be undertaken, together with the associated risk management and control mechanisms.

Decree 324 elaborates the financial, investment, and operational mechanisms applicable to entities operating within the IFC. An important aspect of this decree is the registration, recognition, and termination of IFC membership, which serves as the legal gateway for accessing the IFC’s special regulatory treatment. In addition, Decree 324 introduces a relatively open framework for tax and accounting policies within the IFC, including the application of international accounting standards (IAS/IFRS), and provides the legal basis for a wide range of financial services, from securities and insurance to fintech and equity crowdfunding. The decree also develops the sandbox mechanism for fintech and innovation-driven financial services, as initially provided under Article 24 of the IFC Resolution. The criteria, conditions, scope of application, and procedures for registration, assessment, and licensing of sandbox participation are expected to be further specified by the IFC Executive Council.

Matters relating to the licensing and operation of banks, capital flows, and financial safety are addressed in Decree 329. This decree establishes the legal framework for a system of IFC member banks operating with greater flexibility than under the domestic banking regime, particularly in foreign exchange transactions and cross-border activities, while maintaining stringent compliance and risk management requirements aligned with international standards. Further, all IFC members are subject to obligations on anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing, and counter-proliferation financing under this decree.

Complementing this, Decree 330 introduces a dedicated legal framework for the establishment and operation of commodity exchanges within the IFC. It permits the formation of commodity trading platforms and the trading of a wide range of derivative instruments, including futures, options, and other derivatives. It is worth noting that Decree 330 clarifies that the goods permitted to be traded via commodity exchanges under Article 13 of the IFC Resolution include not only traditional commodities, but also certain digital assets, specifically cultural and artistic products structured as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

Pillar 3: Operational Enablement and Human Capital

Beyond financial regulations, the IFC framework also addresses the practical conditions required for daily operation:

  • Decree 325 establishes a tailored labor and employment regime for the IFC, including flexibility in the recruitment and management of foreign professionals.
  • Decree 327 sets out special entry, exit, residence, and long-term stay arrangements for foreign investors, experts, and key personnel working in the IFC.
  • Decree 326 addresses land use and environmental matters, clarifying land allocation, land use rights, and environmental compliance for IFC projects.

These measures reflect a policy recognition that the IFC mechanism competes not only on tax or regulatory treatments, but also on ease of operation, availability of talent, and infrastructure readiness.

Pillar 4: Dispute Resolution

The final pillar concerns how disputes are resolved, an issue of particular importance for cross-border financial transactions.

Decree 328 establishes a specialized International Arbitration Center within the IFC. The decree permits, in defined circumstances, the application of foreign governing law and limits judicial intervention where parties have validly agreed to arbitration. This approach aligns dispute resolution within the IFC with international commercial expectations, while remaining embedded within Vietnam’s legal framework.

Outlook

The IFC Resolution and its eight implementing decrees mark a significant structural development in Vietnam’s financial regulatory landscape. Taken together, they establish a special legal foundation for the operation of the IFC and signal Vietnam’s intention to develop the IFC as a functioning, internationally oriented financial ecosystem, rather than a purely experimental or incentive-driven model.

At the same time, the framework reflects an expectation that implementation will be phased and adaptive. While the current decrees establish the core legal framework, further refinement through subordinate guidance and regulatory practice is anticipated as the IFC transitions from establishment to full operation. The breadth and internal coherence of the framework suggest that participation in the IFC will require careful structuring, ongoing compliance planning, and a clear understanding of how the IFC regime interacts with Vietnam’s general legal framework.

As the regime continues to evolve, market participants will need to closely monitor regulatory developments and supervisory approaches, and adopt a proactive and strategically informed legal approach to manage regulatory risk while positioning themselves to capture opportunities within Vietnam’s emerging international financial centers.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2025
Thai authorities have escalated efforts to block unlawful cross-border digital asset business operators. On June 19, 2025, the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) issued a notification empowering it to ban internet access to operations or services offered by digital asset business operators who lack licenses from the Thailand Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). This ban, issued under the 2023 Royal Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technology Crime, particularly aims to block Thai users’ access to services offered by unlicensed offshore digital asset providers via their own apps or websites or through public social media platforms. Compliance Requirements The notification requires internet service providers and social media platforms selected by MDES to immediately impose internet access restrictions on identified apps, websites, and IP addresses of illegal operators upon receiving MDES orders. Takedown Orders There are two tracks for competent officials at MDES to issue orders to operators: If the competent official is notified by the SEC of licensing noncompliance by a particular digital asset business operator, the competent official can issue a takedown order to the operator upon approval from the permanent secretary of MDES. If the competent official independently discovers, or receives a complaint from any third party other than the SEC, that a digital asset business operator may have violated licensing requirements, the competent official can ask the SEC to verify and confirm the relevant facts and noncompliance before seeking approval from the permanent secretary of MDES to issue the takedown order. Streamlined Enforcement Prior to this notification, the SEC could obtain takedown orders only from Thai courts under the 2007 Computer Crime Act to take down or block access to unlicensed digital asset platforms and apps. This was a relatively
Read More
July 11, 2025
Vietnam’s recent embrace of “regulatory sandboxes” reflects a deliberate policy choice to balance the need for robust oversight with an equally pressing imperative to catalyze innovation. A sandbox is a controlled, time-bound framework in which businesses may pilot emerging technologies, products, or business models under relaxed or tailor-made regulatory requirements, thereby allowing regulators to observe risks in real time while innovators validate commercial viability without bearing the full weight of the traditional compliance regime. By issuing sandbox regulations, the government of Vietnam is signaling its commitment to accelerating digital transformation, attracting investment, and developing a knowledge-based economy, all while safeguarding financial stability, consumer protection, and national security. This strategy is embodied in a suite of instruments that together establish sector-specific sandboxes: Decree No. 94/2025/ND-CP on the Regulatory Sandbox in the Banking Sector (Fintech Sandbox Decree), effective July 1, 2025. Law on Digital Technology Industry (DTI Law), effective January 1, 2026, and Law on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI Law), effective October 1, 2025. Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 on International Financial Centers (IFC Resolution), effective September 1, 2025. In addition, a draft resolution on the pilot implementation of the crypto-asset market (Draft Crypto Pilot Resolution) is expected to introduce a dedicated sandbox for crypto-asset service providers later this year, further underscoring Vietnam’s holistic, forward-looking approach to regulating emerging technologies. Below is a brief summary of all the regulatory sandboxes, who they are open for, and what businesses are attracted. Fintech Sandbox Decree Under the Fintech Sandbox Decree, besides credit institutions and foreign bank branches, fintech companies operating in Vietnam can apply for a Certificate of Sandbox Participation issued by the State Bank of Vietnam to operate any of the following services in Vietnam: Credit scoring: A solution applicable to information technology systems of credit institutions, branches of foreign banks, and fintech
Read More
July 2, 2025
On June 27, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly adopted a Resolution on International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“IFC Resolution”), which is set to take effect September 1, 2025, putting forward major policy breakthroughs on multiple fronts. The IFC Resolution has the goal of turning Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang into leading international financial centers with autonomy and tools to compete, thereby raising Vietnam’s position in the global financial network, in association with economic growth drivers. Below are some of the key points of the IFC Resolution, which has notable changes from previous drafts (see our articles on Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking and Vietnam’s Emerging Regulatory Landscape for Blockchain and Cryptocurrency), including: The removal of the Central Supervisory Agency. The addition of a definition of international financial centers, which are specific geographic areas in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang with members entitled to special policies. The addition of a list of entities eligible for membership, and entitlement to the special policies. Major Policy Breakthroughs The IFC Resolution introduces specific policies in the following areas: Liberalization of foreign exchange control for members, including policies such as open foreign exchange use between members and exemption from foreign exchange control procedures for 100% foreign-owned members. Specialized licensing for members to establish and operate single-member limited liability banks and foreign bank branches with the ability to apply accounting standards, debt classification, risk provisions, and prudential ratios according to the owner’s policies. Creation of a capital market for innovative startups, including a crowdfunding mechanism or private placement mechanism through a licensed platform, and development of a green finance market with green certification. Creation of a regulatory sandbox for fintech technologies, products, services, and business models not yet prescribed by law, offering exemption from compliance with
Read More
June 19, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has released draft guidelines establishing principles for managing artificial intelligence (AI) risks in the financial sector. The draft guidelines provide a structured framework for the responsible adoption of AI technologies. Financial service providers will be able to use the guidelines as a reference to appropriately manage their risks in a manner that aligns with internationally recognized best practices. The BOT is accepting public comments on the draft guidelines until June 30, 2025. Scope and Application The draft guidelines apply to all financial service providers, including financial institutions and special financial institutions under the Financial Institution Business Act, as well as payment providers under the Payment Systems Act. These guidelines supplement existing BOT risk management guidelines covering IT risk management, third-party risk management, data governance, and market conduct. The guidelines define AI systems as systems that mimic human intelligence, including machine learning, deep learning, generative AI (such as large language models), and agentic AI. This definition specifically excludes rule-based automation systems like robotic process automation and condition matching. Key Risk Management Principles The guidelines lay out two main principles in managing AI risk. Governance: Financial service providers should define and establish clear roles and responsibilities for their personnel and AI system supervision structures to uphold FEAT (fairness, ethics, accountability, and transparency) principles as follows: Stakeholder roles and responsibilities. Financial service providers should define roles and responsibilities for boards and executives on AI risk oversight. Responsibilities include establishing an AI system usage policy, designating personnel responsible for AI risk management, and building awareness of AI-related risk within the organization. AI system usage policy. The AI system usage policy should be aligned with organizational objectives, regulatory requirements, and FEAT principles. These policies should be reviewed regularly to respond to technological advancements and evolving risk profiles. Risk management
Read More