You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 3, 2015

Effects of a Land and Buildings Tax on Condo Owners

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

As has been widely reported, the Finance Ministry has proposed a new property tax on land and building owners. However, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha has decided to delay the new tax, citing concerns about weak economic growth and the bill’s impact on the poor.

Despite the prime minister’s latest decision, property owners should be aware of the proposed tax bill’s provisions so they can prepare for the eventuality that the bill is passed. This article will discuss the proposed bill’s impact on a particular segment of property holders: owners of condominium units.

The proposed law represents a stark departure from the current law’s stance on property taxes. At present, property tax is governed by the Local Maintenance Tax Act of 1965, under which the government collects a local maintenance tax from real estate owners. If an owner uses his or her property as a personal residence, then the local maintenance tax can be partially reduced or even eliminated, depending on the location and size of the property.

For example, if a person owns land in an area that is densely populated such as central Bangkok, he or she will only be obligated to pay local maintenance tax on that land if the area was more than 100 square wah. This tax is not enforced for condominium units that are used by their owners as personal residences.

Under the proposed new law, however, the government is seeking to increase the tax base to generate additional streams of revenue. Therefore, the proposed law provides for additional factors and considerations such as the value or area of a condominium unit to determine tax eligibility.

The value would be based on an assessment price set by the Treasury Department. According to information currently available but still under review by the Finance Ministry, if the area of a condominium unit exceeded 50 square metres or its value was higher than 1 million baht, the owner would be required to pay the new tax. With such criteria, a large percentage of condominium units in Bangkok would be subject to tax.

In addition, according to currently available information, if an owner of a condominium unit used his or her unit as a place of residence, the applicable tax rate would not exceed 0.1% of the unit’s assessed value.

If the same unit owner had a second condominium unit in Thailand with an area of more than 50 square metres or a value that exceeded 1 million baht, the applicable tax rate on such an additional unit would not be higher than 0.5% of its assessed value.

If the law takes effect, the proposed land and building taxes would apply to all condominium owners. Taxpayers would be required to pay the new tax by the end of April each year.

However, one potential consequence of such a law would be a reduction in the number of condominium unit resales.

The Lands Department, upon notification by the relevant government entities, might attach “encumbrances” to a condominium unit if an owner did not pay the tax.

As the official transfer of a condominium unit must be registered at a local Lands Department office, the outstanding tax liability attached to the unit would hold up the transfer until the tax was paid.

Condominium owners would, however, be able to challenge the tax assessments levied against them. Owners could do this by petitioning a local administrative executive to review the assessment. If the owner disagreed with the local administrative executive’s decision, an additional appeal could be made to an appeal committee.

Importantly, owners would still be responsible for paying the applicable taxes during the petition and appeal process. The only exception would be if the local administrative executive allowed the taxpayer not to pay the tax pending the appeal. If the taxpayer did not agree with the appeal committee’s decision, he or she could file a claim against the relevant government entity.

Whether the tax bill will be passed is uncertain. What is certain, however, is that current and prospective condominium owners should take note of how they may be affected if the law eventually comes into force.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
April 30, 2026
Thailand’s Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa regime offers an attractive immigration pathway for qualifying foreign nationals, providing a 10-year renewable permission to stay in Thailand. Following amendments under Board of Investment (BOI) Announcement No. Por. 3/2568 dated February 4, 2025, the regime now more explicitly accommodates property investment as a qualifying vehicle—a development of particular relevance to foreign nationals already considering real estate acquisitions in Thailand. The LTR Visa is available to several categories of applicants, including wealthy global citizens with global assets of at least USD 1 million, and wealthy pensioners aged 50 or older with an annual pension or fixed income of at least USD 40,000. Property as a Qualifying Investment For both categories, property investment is recognized as one of three eligible investment types alongside Thai government bonds (with at least five years remaining to maturity) and direct investments in Thai companies or approved venture capital or private equity vehicles. The minimum qualifying property investment is USD 500,000 for wealthy global citizens and USD 250,000 for wealthy pensioners. Eligible property types include freehold condominiums, buildings, or villas, as well as leasehold properties with a remaining lease term of at least 10 years. Health Coverage Requirement Beyond the investment threshold, applicants must demonstrate adequate health coverage. This requirement can be satisfied through a health insurance policy covering at least USD 50,000 in Thai medical expenses with at least 10 months of remaining coverage, evidence of social security benefits covering Thai medical costs, or a bank deposit of at least USD 100,000 retained for 12 months. Practical Considerations For foreign nationals already considering property acquisitions in prime residential markets—where investment values commonly meet or exceed the USD 500,000 threshold—the visa pathway effectively transforms a real estate purchase into a dual-purpose investment, combining asset ownership with long-term residence rights that
April 7, 2026
Real estate law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins provided the chapter on Vietnam for Practical Law’s Commercial Real Estate Global Guide 2026, a comparative jurisdictional guide in Q&A format giving a high-level overview of real estate investment structures, restrictions on foreign ownership, and other important issues of real estate law. The main topics include the following: Real estate investment Title to real estate Sale of real estate Real estate tax Real estate finance Real estate leases Planning and development controls To read the Vietnam chapter, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the