You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 3, 2015

Effects of a Land and Buildings Tax on Condo Owners

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

As has been widely reported, the Finance Ministry has proposed a new property tax on land and building owners. However, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha has decided to delay the new tax, citing concerns about weak economic growth and the bill’s impact on the poor.

Despite the prime minister’s latest decision, property owners should be aware of the proposed tax bill’s provisions so they can prepare for the eventuality that the bill is passed. This article will discuss the proposed bill’s impact on a particular segment of property holders: owners of condominium units.

The proposed law represents a stark departure from the current law’s stance on property taxes. At present, property tax is governed by the Local Maintenance Tax Act of 1965, under which the government collects a local maintenance tax from real estate owners. If an owner uses his or her property as a personal residence, then the local maintenance tax can be partially reduced or even eliminated, depending on the location and size of the property.

For example, if a person owns land in an area that is densely populated such as central Bangkok, he or she will only be obligated to pay local maintenance tax on that land if the area was more than 100 square wah. This tax is not enforced for condominium units that are used by their owners as personal residences.

Under the proposed new law, however, the government is seeking to increase the tax base to generate additional streams of revenue. Therefore, the proposed law provides for additional factors and considerations such as the value or area of a condominium unit to determine tax eligibility.

The value would be based on an assessment price set by the Treasury Department. According to information currently available but still under review by the Finance Ministry, if the area of a condominium unit exceeded 50 square metres or its value was higher than 1 million baht, the owner would be required to pay the new tax. With such criteria, a large percentage of condominium units in Bangkok would be subject to tax.

In addition, according to currently available information, if an owner of a condominium unit used his or her unit as a place of residence, the applicable tax rate would not exceed 0.1% of the unit’s assessed value.

If the same unit owner had a second condominium unit in Thailand with an area of more than 50 square metres or a value that exceeded 1 million baht, the applicable tax rate on such an additional unit would not be higher than 0.5% of its assessed value.

If the law takes effect, the proposed land and building taxes would apply to all condominium owners. Taxpayers would be required to pay the new tax by the end of April each year.

However, one potential consequence of such a law would be a reduction in the number of condominium unit resales.

The Lands Department, upon notification by the relevant government entities, might attach “encumbrances” to a condominium unit if an owner did not pay the tax.

As the official transfer of a condominium unit must be registered at a local Lands Department office, the outstanding tax liability attached to the unit would hold up the transfer until the tax was paid.

Condominium owners would, however, be able to challenge the tax assessments levied against them. Owners could do this by petitioning a local administrative executive to review the assessment. If the owner disagreed with the local administrative executive’s decision, an additional appeal could be made to an appeal committee.

Importantly, owners would still be responsible for paying the applicable taxes during the petition and appeal process. The only exception would be if the local administrative executive allowed the taxpayer not to pay the tax pending the appeal. If the taxpayer did not agree with the appeal committee’s decision, he or she could file a claim against the relevant government entity.

Whether the tax bill will be passed is uncertain. What is certain, however, is that current and prospective condominium owners should take note of how they may be affected if the law eventually comes into force.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 27, 2026
On August 25, 2026, Thailand’s Ministry of Interior issued an urgent circular letter (No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097) to all provincial governors, introducing enhanced enforcement guidelines for the investigation and prosecution of suspected nominee landownership by foreign nationals. The circular letter builds upon a prior circular letter issued on April 19, 2023 (No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 7665), which first established the framework for provincial-level investigation committees and interagency cooperation on this issue. Under Thailand’s Land Code, foreign nationals are generally prohibited from owning land. To circumvent this restriction, some foreign nationals have historically used Thai nominees, whether individuals or Thai-registered juristic persons, to hold land on their behalf. Various government enforcement measures have been progressively strengthened in recent years. The new circular letter introduces three key measures: Expanded investigation committees. Provincial authorities must add representatives from specialized investigative agencies (such as local police superintendents) to the existing Fact-Finding and Investigation Committees, giving them broader access to shareholding data, tax records, immigration information, financial records, and evidentiary materials. Proactive screening of juristic persons. Provincial Land Offices are now required to actively screen and flag juristic persons (companies, partnerships, etc.) that show risk indicators of acting as nominees for foreign land ownership. The screening results must be referred to the investigation committees, which will determine whether the entity qualifies as a “foreign national” under the Land Code or was set up to circumvent the law. Two-track enforcement actions. Based on the committee’s findings, enforcement may consist of one or both of the following: Land disposal: If a juristic person is classified as a foreign national under the law, the provincial governor sets a deadline for the entity to dispose of the land under the Land Code. Criminal prosecution: If the entity was established specifically to hold land on behalf of a foreign national in circumvention
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
August 11, 2026
Cambodia’s Ministry of Justice has launched a new platform on its official website to publish notices of forced sales issued by each municipal and provincial court of first instance. The platform’s stated purpose is to inform the public and facilitate greater participation in forced-sale auctions conducted in connection with court-ordered enforcement proceedings. How the Platform Works The platform publishes forced-sale notices from courts of first instance across Cambodia’s municipalities and provinces and includes a link where the public can view properties currently subject to forced sale. To participate in a forced-sale auction, individuals can download Khmer-language bidding application forms through links provided on the platform. The form typically requires the applicant’s name, sex, year of birth, identity card number and issue date, and address, together with details identifying the immovable property (including its ownership certificate number), the relevant enforcement case number and date, and the reference to the public auction or tender announcement issued by the court. Completed application forms must be submitted directly to the specific municipal or provincial court that issued the forced sale. For further inquiries about a particular forced sale, interested parties should likewise contact the relevant municipal or provincial court. Forced Sale of Immovable Property in Cambodia The publication of these notices relates to the forced sale procedure for immovable property under Cambodia’s Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). Unlike property seizure by a court, a forced sale is a compulsory execution proceeding—a subsequent enforcement step that arises only after an underlying dispute has been adjudicated and a debtor fails to pay the debt or outstanding amount due under a final and binding judgment or other enforceable title of execution. For the purposes of this procedure, the term “immovable property” under the CPC refers to land, registered buildings, jointly held shares of such property, registered
August 6, 2026
Every month, VAT-registered businesses in Thailand calculate their output and input VAT and file a return to pay the net amount due or claim a refund. Yet a common and costly dispute arises when a business that has paid input VAT to its supplier—and done everything asked of it—later finds that input VAT rejected on the grounds that the tax invoice was issued by “a person not entitled to issue tax invoices.” In these cases, a buyer may have confirmed the supplier’s VAT registration on the Revenue Department’s website, paid through the banking system, received a complete tax invoice, and kept full payment and inventory records. Even so, if the Revenue Department later determines that the supplier did not genuinely make the sale or collected the VAT without remitting it, the department can disallow the input VAT and assess additional tax, surcharge, and penalty—often more than a year after the transaction. A new article from tax and dispute resolution specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok examines how the Revenue Department and the courts approach these disputes, including two recent Supreme Court (Tax Division) decisions confirming that the taxpayer bears the burden of proving a supplier genuinely sold and delivered the goods and received payment. It considers why the VAT registration system offers no legal safe harbor, why the evidentiary burden falls hardest on online and cross-border transactions where buyers and sellers never meet, and how the Revenue Department’s own digital infrastructure could detect non-remitting suppliers at the source rather than shifting the loss to good-faith buyers. The article also sets out practical guidance: how to build a comprehensive “know-your-supplier” file at the time of a transaction, the procedural steps and strict deadlines for challenging a VAT assessment, and why dispute readiness belongs alongside tax planning at the center