You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 24, 2025

Draft of Vietnam’s Consolidated 2025 Cybersecurity Law Released

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security recently released a draft version of the 2025 Cybersecurity Law, which is intended to replace both the existing 2018 Cybersecurity Law and the 2015 Law on Network Information Security (LNIS). This consolidation reflects a broader effort by the Vietnamese government to streamline and centralize the legal framework governing cybersecurity, data protection, and information security to be under the sole authority of the Ministry of Public Security, moving away from the previous sharing of responsibility with the former Ministry of Information and Communications (which ceased operations earlier this year and merged with the Ministry of Science and Technology). This shift aims to eliminate overlaps and improve enforcement efficiency.

The draft law is built upon the foundation of principles and provisions of both the 2018 Cybersecurity Law and the 2015 LNIS, while also introducing a wide range of amendments and new regulations. By merging the two laws, the government seeks to reduce legal fragmentation and ensure consistency in definitions, obligations, and enforcement mechanisms across related domains like data protection, IT system classification, and cybercrime prevention. The newly introduced amendments include enhanced obligations for service providers, stricter controls on information transmission, classification of IT systems, designation and protection of nationally important information systems, and sector-specific violations and compliance requirements.

Highlights of the draft law are discussed below.

Definition and Obligations of Service Providers

The draft law clearly defines and significantly broadens the scope of entities considered “service providers” under its jurisdiction. This now includes businesses and individuals offering products or services in cyberspace, including both infrastructure and content online services, such as:

  • Internet service providers (ISPs) and providers of telecommunications, hosting, servers, domain names, VPNs, proxy services, and cloud computing;
  • Providers of social networks, websites, and online gaming;
  • Financial institutions, banks, foreign bank branches in Vietnam, e-wallet providers, payment intermediaries, stock exchanges, and digital asset platforms;
  • E-commerce platforms;
  • Logistics providers;
  • Digital television providers; and
  • Other online service providers.

The draft law prescribes specific obligations for online service providers, notably to (i) cooperate with the authorities and facilitate the investigation and handling of cybersecurity violations; (ii) terminate, freeze, identify, and reauthenticate digital accounts, and suspend transactions; (iii) and block, temporarily suspend, or terminate the operation of websites and information systems upon request by a competent authority, among other obligations. These obligations appear to codify the authority’s power to restrict or intervene in online operations and activities in response to cybersecurity violations.

Online Information Management

The draft law generally requires the classification of online information based on its level of confidentiality, mandating the application of appropriate protection measures, including establishing policies and procedures to handle online information. Moreover, the draft law prohibits falsifying the source of the information and sending online commercial information without the recipient’s consent or when the recipient has refused, unless otherwise prescribed by law. This marks a significant tightening of rules around unsolicited digital communications.

Under the draft law, telecommunications enterprises, telecommunications application service providers and IT service providers are required to (i) prevent and address illegal online information communications (including but not limited to spam and fake or infringing information) and (ii) implement mechanisms that allow recipients to refuse such communication. These obligations reflect the government’s intent to strengthen control over harmful digital content. However, they may impose significant compliance burdens on service providers, particularly in terms of monitoring, filtering, and user interface design.

IT System Classification and Protection Requirements

While the LNIS prescribes five classification levels for IT systems based on their importance and sensitivity, the draft law provides only three levels. Notably, level 3 IT systems (those whose sabotage would cause particularly serious harm to public interest, social order, and safety, or pose a serious threat to national defense and security) are designated as important national IT systems and subject to enhanced protection requirements and obligations.

The draft law provides an initial list of important national IT systems, which includes those in the fields of energy, finance, banking, telecommunications, transport, natural resources and environment, chemicals, health, culture, and news media, and sets out that the prime minister will promulgate, amend, and supplement the list at a later stage. Level 3 IT systems would need to undergo cybersecurity eligibility assessments, be certified, and then be subject to annual reporting requirements and unscheduled inspections by the Ministry of Public Security.

Removal of Data Localization and Local Presence Requirements

The 2018 Cybersecurity Law requires foreign and domestic service providers who provide services in cyberspace to store certain regulated data in Vietnam and under specific circumstances establish a local presence in Vietnam, upon the authority’s request. These requirements have been removed under the draft law. This shift reflects a more flexible regulatory approach aimed at balancing national security interests with the realities of global digital business. It also aligns with Vietnam’s commitments under international treaties and standards, promoting freer cross-border data flows while maintaining compliance with the new 2025 Personal Data Protection Law, which remains central to data governance.

Preventing and Combating High-Tech Cybercrime

The draft law introduces a new chapter dedicated to the prevention, detection, and handling of high-tech cybercrime. It outlines the responsibilities of government agencies, organizations, businesses, and individuals in combating such crimes. This addition reflects the growing concern over cybercriminals using advanced technologies to conduct fraud and other illegal activities.

Outlook

The draft 2025 Cybersecurity Law is currently undergoing public consultation and is expected to be refined through several rounds of feedback before being presented to the 15th National Assembly for deliberation during its 10th session in October 2025. Businesses should stay informed and consider participating in the consultation process to help shape the final version of the law and ensure their operational interests are represented.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
Read More
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
Read More
August 10, 2026
On July 31, 2026, Thailand’s Big Data Institute (BDI) launched a public consultation on the principles of a proposed new data-sharing law, with comments accepted until August 31, 2026. If enacted, the law would establish Thailand’s first comprehensive framework for government and private-sector data sharing, creating a systematic, secure, and transparent regime to support analytics, policymaking, research, and innovation. Central Data-Sharing Platform The draft law establishes a central system for data sharing, managed by the BDI. Government agencies would be required to connect to the BDI’s Data Integration and Intelligence Platform (also referred to as D2), in accordance with the BDI’s rules and procedures. Five Dimensions of Data Sharing The draft law covers five key types of data sharing between government (G), businesses (B), and consumers (C): G2B: Private organizations may request government data specifically for research and development purposes. The BDI will assess the applicant’s data governance, security, and privacy capabilities whether such measures meet prescribed standards before forwarding the request to the relevant government agency within 90 days. Any dispute may be escalated to a newly established Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for final determination. G2G: Government agencies may request data from other agencies through the central system. The data-holding agency must respond within 90 days, taking legality, necessity, proportionality, public interest, and personal data protection into account. Disputes may be referred to the Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for adjudication. B2G: In emergency situations involving public safety, economic security, or disaster response, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society may require private entities to provide data through the central data-sharing system. Government agencies must specify the data requested, demonstrate its necessity and expected benefits, and request only data reasonably available to the data holder. Requests for personal data must be limited to the minimum amount necessary. B2C: Royal decrees may
Read More
August 10, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) recently released draft guidance on records of processing activities (ROPA) for personal data controllers and processors under the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA). The draft guidance, which was presented to the public on July 7, 2026, addresses both controller records of collection, use, and disclosure of personal data and processor records of processing activities carried out on behalf of controllers. If implemented, the guidance will significantly expand organizational expectations for ROPA preparation, maintenance, and use across all sectors. Key Takeaways The draft guidance contains several important implications for organizations subject to the PDPA: ROPA reframed as a core accountability tool. The guidance elevates ROPA from an administrative record to a central accountability mechanism, connecting controller duties with recordkeeping obligations. ROPA as a source for privacy notices and governance documents. ROPA should serve as the primary source for privacy notices and align with consent management, retention schedules, DPIAs, incident response plans, and vendor contracts. Expanded scope across all activities. ROPA must cover all processing activities across the organization—including security, finance, HR, and external contractors—with correct controller or processor classification for each. Ongoing maintenance and auditability. ROPA must be updated for any change to systems, purposes, or processors, reviewed at least annually, and maintained with version control and a designated owner. Enhanced vendor, processor, and cross-border transfer requirements. Organizations must document all processors, external recipients, and cross-border transfers, specifying purposes, access scope, and destination countries. Linkage with risk assessment, DPIAs, and LIAs. ROPA should assign risk levels to each activity and identify when data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) or legitimate interests assessments (LIAs) are required, functioning as a risk-management tool. ROPA and data breach readiness. Incomplete ROPA can delay breach response and notification. Organizations should map data flows, vendors,
Read More