You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 8, 2020

Draft Circular on Working Hours and Breaks for Seasonal Workers in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is considering a draft circular that would change regulations on working hours, including overtime, and breaks required for seasonal manufacturing workers and workers that process goods according to orders. The new regulations, if passed, would replace the current regulations under Circular No. 54/2015/TT-BLDTBXH of MOLISA, which was issued on December 16, 2015, and it is envisioned that the new regulations would come into effect on January 1, 2021. MOLISA is accepting public comments on the draft regulations until April 24, 2020.

These draft regulations would apply to workers under definite-term (one to three years) and indefinite-term labor contracts in relation to:

  • Manufacturing in the agricultural, forestry, fishery, and salt production sector that is seasonal in nature and requires immediate harvesting or processing that cannot be delayed; and
  • Processing of goods according to orders that is dependent on the timing of the owner of the goods, including the garment and textile, leather and footwear, and electronics assembly sectors.

The draft regulations are geared toward requiring employers to make an annual plan for working hours that is agreed to in advance by the employer, the employees, and the union, and is reported to the local labor authorities. The purpose is to add clarity on working conditions and to allocate working hours, yet also meet the urgent demands and rush times of employers associated with seasonal and processing work.

The draft regulations provide a complex formula for determining an annual standard allocation of working hours for a position. The formula is based on the premise that an average working day is 8 hours of work per day for normal jobs, or 6 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous jobs.

Annually, employers will be required to make a plan to determine the standard working hours per day for each position. In the annual plan, the standard working hours per day can be:

  • 8 hours per day for normal jobs or 6 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic and dangerous jobs;
  • Between 8 and 12 hours per day for normal jobs or between 6 and 9 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic and dangerous jobs; or
  • Between 4 and 8 hours per day for normal jobs and between 3 and 6 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic and dangerous job.

The total amount of standard hours in the annual plan shall not exceed the statutory limits set out in the draft regulations.

Under the draft regulations, for normal work, the amount of hours worked per day (both normal working hours and overtime hours) cannot exceed 12 hours. For especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous work, no one may work more than 9 hours per day. There are also weekly limits: The maximum hours worked per week cannot exceed 72 hours per week for normal work, and for especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous work, no one may work more than 54 hours per week. Each month, no one would be allowed to work more than 40 hours of overtime, and for those performing especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous work, the maximum amount of overtime per month is 30 hours. No workers may work more than 300 hours of overtime per year.

In regard to breaks, each worker must have at least one day off (24 straight hours) per week. In rush periods, if this cannot be met, the employer must give at least four days off per month.

For those working 10 hours or more per day, the employer must provide at least one 30-minute break, in addition to the normal breaks which are inclusive in the working hours.

The draft regulations provide that employers must arrange for workers to have holidays, Tet and annual leave off.

When making or adjusting annual plans for working hours, the employer must seek input from the local grassroots labor union. The annual plan must be announced to employees 30 days in advance, and consent of employees for overtime work is required. There are also requirements for the employer to report on the implementation of the plan to the local Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs.

For more information on the draft circular, please contact us at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
Read More