You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 8, 2020

Draft Circular on Working Hours and Breaks for Seasonal Workers in Vietnam

Vietnam’s Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is considering a draft circular that would change regulations on working hours, including overtime, and breaks required for seasonal manufacturing workers and workers that process goods according to orders. The new regulations, if passed, would replace the current regulations under Circular No. 54/2015/TT-BLDTBXH of MOLISA, which was issued on December 16, 2015, and it is envisioned that the new regulations would come into effect on January 1, 2021. MOLISA is accepting public comments on the draft regulations until April 24, 2020.

These draft regulations would apply to workers under definite-term (one to three years) and indefinite-term labor contracts in relation to:

  • Manufacturing in the agricultural, forestry, fishery, and salt production sector that is seasonal in nature and requires immediate harvesting or processing that cannot be delayed; and
  • Processing of goods according to orders that is dependent on the timing of the owner of the goods, including the garment and textile, leather and footwear, and electronics assembly sectors.

The draft regulations are geared toward requiring employers to make an annual plan for working hours that is agreed to in advance by the employer, the employees, and the union, and is reported to the local labor authorities. The purpose is to add clarity on working conditions and to allocate working hours, yet also meet the urgent demands and rush times of employers associated with seasonal and processing work.

The draft regulations provide a complex formula for determining an annual standard allocation of working hours for a position. The formula is based on the premise that an average working day is 8 hours of work per day for normal jobs, or 6 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous jobs.

Annually, employers will be required to make a plan to determine the standard working hours per day for each position. In the annual plan, the standard working hours per day can be:

  • 8 hours per day for normal jobs or 6 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic and dangerous jobs;
  • Between 8 and 12 hours per day for normal jobs or between 6 and 9 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic and dangerous jobs; or
  • Between 4 and 8 hours per day for normal jobs and between 3 and 6 hours per day for especially strenuous, toxic and dangerous job.

The total amount of standard hours in the annual plan shall not exceed the statutory limits set out in the draft regulations.

Under the draft regulations, for normal work, the amount of hours worked per day (both normal working hours and overtime hours) cannot exceed 12 hours. For especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous work, no one may work more than 9 hours per day. There are also weekly limits: The maximum hours worked per week cannot exceed 72 hours per week for normal work, and for especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous work, no one may work more than 54 hours per week. Each month, no one would be allowed to work more than 40 hours of overtime, and for those performing especially strenuous, toxic or dangerous work, the maximum amount of overtime per month is 30 hours. No workers may work more than 300 hours of overtime per year.

In regard to breaks, each worker must have at least one day off (24 straight hours) per week. In rush periods, if this cannot be met, the employer must give at least four days off per month.

For those working 10 hours or more per day, the employer must provide at least one 30-minute break, in addition to the normal breaks which are inclusive in the working hours.

The draft regulations provide that employers must arrange for workers to have holidays, Tet and annual leave off.

When making or adjusting annual plans for working hours, the employer must seek input from the local grassroots labor union. The annual plan must be announced to employees 30 days in advance, and consent of employees for overtime work is required. There are also requirements for the employer to report on the implementation of the plan to the local Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs.

For more information on the draft circular, please contact us at [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 2, 2025
On August 26, 2025, the Thai cabinet approved a one-year postponement of mandatory contributions to the Employee Welfare Fund. Originally scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2025, the enforcement date has been deferred to October 1, 2026. The decision to delay the implementation stems from ongoing economic uncertainties in Thailand, driven by several external and domestic factors. These include increased trade tariffs imposed by the United States, the recent rise in the national minimum wage, and continued geopolitical tensions resulting from unresolved disputes with neighboring countries. These challenges have placed significant pressure on both businesses and the labor market, prompting the government to offer temporary relief through this deferral. As a result of the postponement, the following regulations will now come into effect on October 1, 2026: Royal Decree determining the Commencement Period for Savings and Contributions to the Employee Welfare Fund; Ministerial Notification specifying the Rates of Savings and Contributions; and Ministerial Notification outlining the Criteria and Procedures for Employers to Provide Assistance in Cases of Termination of Employment or Death. The Labour Welfare Fund Committee has formally endorsed the postponement. Contribution Rates Unchanged Although the implementation has been delayed, the contribution rates remain unchanged: October 1, 2026–September 30, 2031: Employers and employees each contribute 0.25% of the employee’s wage to the fund. From October 1, 2031, onward: Contributions increase to 0.5% of the employee’s wage for both parties. All other rules and conditions concerning the Employee Welfare Fund remain in full effect.
August 29, 2025
On August 15, 2025, Laos’ Immigration Police Department introduced a pilot online arrival registration system for foreign passport holders entering the country. Under the new system, visitors to Laos will be able to register their arrival online up to three days in advance and will be exempt from filling out paper forms at the border. Starting September 1, 2025, online registrations will be accepted at four major international border checkpoints: Wattay International Airport in Vientiane, Luang Prabang International Airport, Pakse International Airport in Champasak Province, and the First Lao-Thai Friendship Bridge linking Vientiane and Nong Khai Province in Thailand. Foreign passport holders arriving in Laos from this date onward will be able to complete the online registration via the official website of the Department of Immigration: http://www.immigration.gov.la/. Upon successful registration, travelers will receive a QR code valid for three days, which must be presented to border authorities upon arrival to verify the registration. During the pilot phase, which is expected to run until early 2026, travelers who have not registered online will still have the option to complete a paper form at the checkpoint. After the pilot phase, the online registration system will become mandatory nationwide, and paper forms will no longer be accepted. This initiative marks a significant step toward modernizing Laos’ immigration procedures. Transitioning from traditional paper-based entry forms to a streamlined digital system will greatly enhance efficiency at border checkpoints. The submission of traveler information ahead of arrival is expected to drastically reduce processing times and alleviate congestion at arrival counters, especially during peak travel periods.
August 20, 2025
On August 7, 2025, the government of Vietnam promulgated Decree No. 219/2025/ND-CP on foreign workers working in Vietnam (Decree 219), introducing substantial reforms to the management of foreign employees. Taking immediate effect upon issuance, and superseding earlier regulations on foreign employees under Decree No. 152/2020/ND-CP as amended by Decree No. 70/2023/ND-CP (collectively referred to as “Decree 152”), Decree 219 sets out clear timeframes and application requirements for work permit issuance, while adopting more flexible policies to support business operations. The key new provisions are as follows: 1. Relaxed Requirements Regarding Job-Posting Under Decree 152, employers were required to follow a complex process to apply for work permits or work permit exemption certificates for foreign employees. This included posting an advertisement for any position the employer wished to fill with a foreign employee on a designated online portal for a given amount of time, to demonstrate that the company tried, but failed, to find a suitable Vietnamese candidate for the position. This job-posting step now only applies when the foreigner will work in Vietnam under a local labor contract. Foreigners coming to Vietnam as intra-corporate transferees (i.e., as secondees) or working under service contracts are exempt. The job-posting period is also reduced from 15 calendar days to five business days. Employers may also now post the advertisements on multiple websites instead of only the online portal of the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (now the Ministry of Home Affairs after government restructuring) or the provincial-level employment service center. 2. Work Permit Application Dossier Previously, employers were required to complete a preapproval step, whereby they had to submit a dossier explaining their foreign labor demand that required approval from the labor authority. Once approval for the foreign labor demand was granted, the approval dossier was an integral part of
August 20, 2025
With the shift in US policy to discourage DEI programs among government and private-sector employers, some companies have been cutting back. But US companies should be cautious in eliminating their DEI programs globally, as some elements of these programs are obligations under local laws in Vietnam, Thailand, and Cambodia.