You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 27, 2014

Dilemma: File a Claim or Nix the Contract?

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Having multiple legal options is generally viewed as positive in a business context. It may, however, also imply the need to make a difficult decision—one with significant practical and legal consequences. This is particularly so where the transaction is unique, has significant monetary value, or has the potential to affect existing third-party contracts. Real estate transactions fall firmly into this category.

Take a situation in which parties enter into a sale and purchase agreement for real estate. If the seller fails to perform its obligations under the contract, the buyer who is not in breach must decide how best to proceed with the exercise of its legal rights.

These options are provided in Thailand’s Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) and have been further clarified by the Supreme Court.

Together, they establish two specific remedies for the buyer: (i) the right to claim specific performance under the contract, e.g., force transfer of ownership as contemplated by the contract; or (ii) the right to terminate the contract and restore the non-breaching party to its pre-contract condition.

The Supreme Court has made clear that these options are mutually exclusive, so a non-breaching party must clearly adopt one or the other. This is because one option legally terminates the contract, while the other maintains the breaching party’s obligation to perform under the contract—positions that are in legal contradiction.

Deciding on a specific remedy to address the seller’s breach thus requires careful consideration of the benefits and potential disadvantages of each option. In this article, we elaborate on issues the buyer should consider before exercising the right to claim specific performance or terminate the contract entirely.

Claim for Specific Performance

According to Section 213 of the CCC, when one party fails to perform its obligations under a contract, the other is entitled to enforce the contract by filing a civil claim against the defaulting party asking the court for compulsory performance.

Under Section 213, if the obligation is to carry out a juristic act such as transferring ownership of property, the court is empowered to order specific performance on the basis that such performance is consistent with the seller’s declaration of intent at the time of contracting.

In addition to obtaining specific performance, a non-breaching buyer has the right to claim compensation for any damages incurred from the seller’s failure to perform the contractual obligation. This may include contractually stipulated penalties for non-performance.

Terminate the Contract

According to Section 391 of the CCC, when a seller does not fulfill its contractual obligations, the buyer has the right to rescind the contract entirely, and each party is thereafter bound to restore the other to its pre-contract condition.

To terminate the contract, the buyer must express its intent to terminate, typically by sending a termination notice to the seller. Such expression of intent cannot be withdrawn.

The buyer also has the right to claim compensation for damages incurred from the seller’s failure to perform its obligation.

For example, if the seller fails to transfer land ownership and the buyer chooses to terminate the contract, the buyer can claim for both the price paid and for damages. After the contract is terminated, the buyer cannot claim for specific performance.

After the contract is terminated, parties then have the obligation to restore each other to their pre-contract condition. A non-defaulting party may refuse to restore the defaulting party to its pre-contract condition, however, if the latter fails to restore the former to its pre-contract condition.

Consider the case of a buyer who has placed an initial deposit for land and is permitted by the seller to possess the land before transfer of ownership.

If the seller fails to transfer ownership within the prescribed period and the buyer terminates the contract due to such breach, then the seller is required to return the deposit. If the seller refuses, however, the buyer can possess the land until the deposit is returned.

Conclusion

Prior to deciding how to proceed with a claim for specific performance or contract termination, a buyer should carefully assess its objectives in entering the contract and the seller’s ability to perform if at all possible including conducting financial due diligence. The conduct of adequate due diligence can significantly reduce the risk of breach and can avoid the cost and time required to litigate a dispute.

If avoiding a dispute is unavoidable, however, negotiation and settlement efforts should be seriously considered, as they may lead to a solution that is preferable to protracted litigation. In some cases where litigation is an unavoidable last resort, understanding the best option available to a non-breaching party can help to maximize the benefits from the dispute resolution process.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 24, 2025
On April 8, 2025, Thailand passed a resolution to reduce the government fees for registering the sale and mortgage of immovable property. These reductions are outlined in two notifications issued by the Ministry of Interior and published in the Government Gazette on April 22, 2025. The measures are part of the government’s ongoing efforts to support the real estate sector and promote property ownership. The reduced fees apply to sale and mortgage registrations for certain types of properties—detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, accompanying land, and condominium units—with a sale price, official assessed value, or mortgage amount not exceeding THB 7 million. The reduced fees apply only when the buyer is an individual with Thai nationality. The reduced rates for registration fees are as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the officially assessed value (reduced from the normal rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from the normal rate of 1%) when registered at the same time as the sale of the property. These reduced rates are in effect from April 22, 2025, to June 30, 2026.
Read More
April 16, 2025
The recent earthquake in Myanmar on March 28, 2025, that also significantly affected parts of northern Thailand and Bangkok has raised concerns about building safety and structural resilience in Thailand. This event has reminded building owners and possessors in Thailand of the necessity of understanding earthquake-resistant building standards, their legal obligations regarding structural inspections, and compliance requirements under Thai law. Under Thai law, building owners and possessors have specific responsibilities regarding the structural integrity of their properties, particularly in areas prone to seismic activity. This article lays out the key legal requirements and outlines the potential penalties for noncompliance. Structural Design and Earthquake Resistance Requirements With respect to standards regarding earthquake resistance, Thailand’s Ministry of Interior has issued the Ministerial Regulation on Load Bearing, Durability, and Resistance of Buildings and Soil Foundations to Earthquake Forces B.E. 2564 (2021), replacing a previous ministerial regulation from 2007. The current ministerial regulation prescribes certain types of buildings in 43 designated provinces to comply with seismic design standards. These 43 provinces can be categorized into three main zones: Zone 1: Areas requiring monitoring due to the potential for impact on the structural integrity and stability of buildings when exposed to seismic waves, consisting of 14 provinces (e.g., Krabi, Surat Thani, Prachuap Khiri Khan, etc.). Zone 2: Areas where there may be moderate impact on the structural integrity and stability of buildings when exposed to seismic waves, consisting of 17 provinces (e.g., Bangkok, Nonthaburi, etc.) Zone 3: Areas where there may be significant impact on the structural integrity and stability of buildings when exposed to seismic waves, consisting of 12 provinces (e.g., Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Kanchanaburi, etc.) For buildings located in these categorized zones, the geometric configuration of the building structure must be designed to ensure stability in resisting seismic waves. Additionally, structural
Read More
March 6, 2025
On February 18, 2025, the Thai Senate approved an amendment to the Act on the Establishment of and Procedures for the Tax Court. This follows the July 2024 approval by the Thai cabinet and subsequent preparation of supporting secondary legislation. This important amendment to procedural law, once it takes effect, will extend the exclusive jurisdictional powers of the Tax Court to all criminal tax, customs, and excise tax claims in addition to the court’s existing jurisdiction over all such civil claims. The amendment, while now formally approved by the legislature, is awaiting the king’s signature and will take effect 180 days after its publication in the Government Gazette. Based upon its projected publication date, the amendment will likely take effect by the end of the third quarter of this year. This development is set to offer a more sophisticated Tax Court litigation process for highly specialized and often complex criminal tax and customs claims, something with which Thailand’s traditional criminal courts have struggled. It also ensures that all tax and customs matters are adjudicated before the same court, saving time, party costs, and judicial resources. This appears likely to result in more consistent adjudication of criminal tax and customs disputes, a benefit for the Thai government and party litigants alike. Any ongoing criminal tax and customs claims already commenced with the respective criminal courts on the date on which the amendment becomes effective will remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of those criminal courts. The Tax Court will have exclusive jurisdiction over all other claims. This important legislative change offers those managing or otherwise facing civil and/or criminal Thai tax or customs disputes the opportunity to more effectively plan and execute a uniform defense strategy before a single, qualified forum.
Read More
March 4, 2025
On February 20, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam made public the executed Resolution 170/2024/QH15, which outlines special mechanisms and policies to address difficulties and obstacles related to notable real estate projects and land issues in Da Nang, Ho Chi Minh City, and Khanh Hoa Province. This resolution, with an effective date of April 1, 2025, aims to resolve issues identified in inspection conclusions, audits, and court judgments, including 1,313 cases of land-use term violations in Da Nang. Solutions Resolution 170 provides a variety of mechanisms and policies to clear the way for projects to proceed with implementation. These may include, depending on the specific location, the following solutions. For issued Land Use Rights Certificates (LURC) that violate the land-use term for business production land in Da Nang: For projects that have already been invested in and utilized, the land-use terms in the LURC may be adjusted to 50 years from the date of the decision on land allocation, land lease, conversion of land use purpose, or actual land handover. For continued use of land, determining land prices, and calculating land use fees and land rental fees applicable to a list of projects in Da Nang, Ho Chi Minh City, and Khanh Hoa Province: The city/provincial People’s Committees will review and complete, within their authority, the procedures related to land, investment, construction, environment, and forestry of such projects in accordance with the current laws. Projects that meet legal and regulatory requirements after thorough review and compliance checks will be allowed to continue, provided they are aligned with urban planning, environmental standards, and national security requirements. In addition, investors must fulfill applicable financial obligations, including land use fees and land rental payments, which will be reassessed and collected based on the land price tables applicable in Da Nang, Ho Chi
Read More