You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 23, 2020

COVID-19: Laos Releases Requirements for Companies Seeking to Resume Normal Operations

On April 21, 2020, following the Prime Minister’s extension of the lockdown measures in Laos to May 3, the National Taskforce Committee for COVID-19 Prevention and Control (the Taskforce) issued guidance on what companies must do to be allowed to operate during the lockdown, entitled Instructions on the Conditions and Measures for Eligible Private Companies to Operate during the COVID-19 Outbreak. 

The instructions, which are effective from April 21, provide a set of requirements that private sector businesses, projects (e.g., concession activities), legal entities, and factories (collectively called Operators) must comply with to resume operations. Operators must be inspected by a specific unit mandated by the Taskforce before resuming any operations, and an agreement or memorandum between the Operators and the Taskforce unit must be signed to confirm that the Operators are compliant. Although not expressly indicated in the instruction, we understand that all companies may need authorization from the Taskforce to resume operations after the lockdown ends. Further information is expected on this in the coming weeks.

Conditions for Operation

  1. Operators must have a designated working area, and staff dormitories must be of a good standard. Those with a large workforce, or a high enough risk factor, must have an isolated quarantine area and an emergency transportation vehicle on standby. The original text does not clarify what is meant by “large workforce”, as it does not provide a threshold thereof, or “high risk,” but we understand that these recommendations must be implemented as practically possible, and that the authorities will not expect, for example, small enterprises to have a staff dormitory.
  2. The working environment must be spacious enough to guarantee social distancing of at least one meter.
  3. Dormitories must be sufficiently spacious and beds must be at least one meter apart.
  4. The canteen must be sufficiently spacious, and Operators must guarantee good hygiene, prohibit the common use of utensils, and ensure one-meter social distancing.
  5. If dormitories are not situated on site, employee transportation must provide sufficient space to enable one-meter social distancing.
  6. Sufficient 24-hour clean water, handwashing stations, alcohol gel, and masks must be available for all employees.
  7. 24-hour security must be provided, authorization to leave must be required the workplace, and outsiders must be prohibited.
  8. Cleaners must properly dispose of waste that may cause COVID-19 infections, such as by providing covered trashcans.
  9. Operators must facilitate inspections and visits from medical teams from the relevant authority. We understand that expenses linked to inspections must be borne by the Operators.

Measures that Operators Must Implement 

  1. Body temperature must be checked, and alcohol gel must be provided to all employees, prior to entering or leaving the working area, dormitory, and canteen, from morning to evening every day. Operators must also keep a written record the symptoms of each person. If any employee exhibits a fever (above 37.5 degrees), cough, or difficulties in breathing, they must be separated from the working area and put in isolated quarantine. Operators should immediately alert the authorities by using emergency numbers 165 and 166, and arrange to have the person examined by a doctor.
  2. Masks must be provided to all employees during working times, and other times when people must be in the same location as others. Handwashing stations must be situated at convenient locations for the employees.
  3. Social distancing of one meter must be guaranteed for employees. Activities where this social distancing requirement cannot be guaranteed are prohibited. The regulation provides a non-exhaustive list of examples, such as sports and celebrations. However, this requirement may be broadly interpreted—we understand that social drinking after work with colleagues is not permitted, for example.
  4. Specific prevention measures for suppliers from outside the company must be put in place, similar to those required for employees.
  5. Working areas, canteens, toilets, dormitories, warehouses, and storage rooms must be cleaned every day after working hours.
  6. Hiring new employees, consultants, and specialists, from abroad or from Laos, must be postponed until the outbreak is contained.

There are no details on when inspections will take place, and further guidance is expected in due course. Tilleke & Gibbins will continue to keep you informed as the situation develops.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 19, 2025
Over the past two years—particularly since Thailand announced incentives for EVs, including tax exemptions and reductions—there has been a clear trend of manufacturers relocating their facilities to Thailand. This shift is reshaping the country’s industrial landscape and creating significant opportunities in the real estate sector for companies looking to establish or expand EV manufacturing operations in Southeast Asia. Incentive-Driven Market Transformation The government’s tax exemptions and reductions have proven effective in attracting foreign investment, with Chinese manufacturers currently dominating the market. Most EV parts and car manufacturers operating in Thailand are from China, reflecting the prominence of Chinese EV brands that have already established a presence in the country. The sector encompasses manufacturers of electrical equipment as well as companies seeking to establish facilities for producing electric vehicle components, parts, and accessories. The surge in activity is evident across Thailand’s EV manufacturing sector, with legal practices handling these transactions experiencing unprecedented demand. Industrial Real Estate Framework and Market Dynamics Thailand’s industrial real estate framework provides compelling advantages for foreign manufacturers, who typically face restrictions on foreign land ownership under the Land Code. However, foreign investors can benefit from exemptions to these restrictions if the land is located within industrial real estate zones designated by the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT) or they obtain investment promotion from the Board of Investment (BOI) if the land is located outside an industrial estate area governed by the IEAT. Both the IEAT and BOI provide special tax and nontax incentives, including foreign land ownership, with even greater incentives available for land situated within the country’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). This regulatory advantage has sparked a parallel trend in land development. Industrial real estate developers in the EEC are actively consolidating land into large plots to develop new industrial estate projects, recognizing that
September 17, 2025
M&A specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins have contributed the Vietnam chapter to Private M&A 2025, a newly released guide from Lexology Panoramic. The publication provides practical insights into private mergers and acquisitions frameworks in jurisdictions worldwide. The Vietnam chapter addresses key aspects of private M&A transactions, including: Structure and process, legal regulation, and required consents Advisers, negotiation, and documentation Due diligence and disclosure obligations Pricing, consideration, and financing Conditions, preclosing covenants, and termination rights Representations, warranties, indemnities, and postclosing covenants Taxation of transfers Employees, pensions, and benefits Recent legal, regulatory, and market practice developments The chapter highlights how Vietnam’s legal framework governs private acquisitions and disposals, outlines typical transaction processes and structures, and provides guidance on common regulatory and practical considerations. It also notes recent trends, including increased scrutiny of merger control filings by the Vietnam Competition Commission and regulatory changes affecting M&A approvals. The full Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF through the button below. Readers can also gain 30 days of complimentary access to Private M&A 2025 and Lexology Panoramic’s full library of resources through this link.
September 10, 2025
Under Thai law, authorized directors stand as a company’s mind and will and, as such, may incur personal criminal liability for acts or omissions committed in the course of company business. When allegations surface, directors must be prepared for the practical reality that, before guilt or innocence is ever adjudicated, they could be deprived of liberty unless bail release is promptly achieved through the competent legal authority. When Bail Can Be Granted Two procedural moments trigger the need to consider bail. The first arises during the investigative phase, when a claim is lodged against a director with the competent law enforcement authorities. Upon receipt of a complaint, the assigned inquiry officer summons the director for questioning, compiles evidence, and ultimately forwards a prosecution or nonprosecution recommendation to the public prosecutor. Although the public prosecutor retains ultimate discretion to indict an accused director, the police or prosecutor may conclude that pretrial detention is necessary and may therefore apply to the court for an order to hold the director in court custody. The second moment occurs after a criminal case is filed directly with the court. This occurs once a court accepts a criminal case filed by a prosecutor against a director or, alternatively, when the court accepts a case filed by an individual for trial. For cases filed by individuals, the plaintiff presents prima facie evidence at the preliminary hearing, and the court will accept the complaint if it finds sufficient grounds, thereby conferring upon the director the status of a criminal defendant. Upon acceptance of the criminal case, the court then has the inherent authority to order custody pending trial unless the defendant secures bail release. Procedural Considerations Experienced litigants typically prepare bail security in advance and submit a bail petition at the earliest possible time. While there are
September 8, 2025
On September 1, 2025, Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) issued Directive No. 106/2025 to remind all companies and organizations registered under the Myanmar Companies Law of their obligation to strictly comply with the DICA registrar’s orders, directives, and procedures. This directive highlights the importance of legal and procedural compliance in corporate filings, governance changes, and operational conduct. It also signals increased scrutiny over documentation submitted during annual returns, share transfers, and director appointments or resignations. Public companies will be subject to closer regulatory attention, and new company registrations will involve vetting of proposed directors to ensure prior compliance with applicable laws. Compliance The directive emphasizes the following points: Companies must ensure full compliance with the Myanmar Companies Law and all directives issued by the registrar. This includes the proper submission of annual returns and adherence to updated requirements for share transfers and changes in directors. Companies and organizations must comply with all applicable laws, rules, directives, and procedures issued by relevant ministries and departments. If any authority takes action due to noncompliance, the registrar may also take appropriate measures. Noncompliance may result in regulatory sanctions, including restrictions on future company participation and vetting under anti–money laundering and counter–terrorism financing protocols. Prospective directors of newly registered companies will be vetted to confirm no prior violations of applicable laws. Entities must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, both during initial registration and in subsequent filings. Companies are strongly advised to review their internal compliance frameworks and ensure readiness to meet DICA’s documentation and procedural expectations. In particular, companies must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, whether during initial registration or in subsequent filings. For more information on this DICA announcement, or on any aspect of corporate registration, or assistance with