You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 11, 2020

COVID-19 and Returning to Work: Health and Safety Implications for Employers

Bangkok Post: Human Resources Watch

With the easing of lockdown restrictions in Thailand and the removal of stay-at-home orders, many employers have been proceeding with plans to transition employees from their temporary home offices back to the actual workplace.

The obligations of private sector employers to provide safe and hygienic working conditions for their employees are stipulated under Thailand’s Occupational Safety, Health and Environment Act. Employers are required to arrange and maintain their premises to support safe and healthy workforce operations and prevent any harm to the life, body, or mental or physical health of their employees.

In considering this current issue of transitioning their employees back to the workplace, employers must contemplate various issues, both from an employment law perspective and for the protection of employee health and safety. A safe return to the workplace for both employers and employees should proceed in tandem with preventive actions and mitigation of potential risks in the workplace.

To aid in this careful transition of employees back to the workplace, this article provides some general guidance for employers regarding health and safety practices, as well as consideration of some approaches to prevent COVID-19 transmission among personnel.

Physical Distancing in the Workplace

The unique challenges and risks posed by the current situation mean that implementing the necessary preventive measures may require substantial changes to workplace practices. To facilitate the transition, employers may find it practical to resume operations at the workplace on a gradual basis, determining which employees should return to work first to best ensure effective physical distancing.

In addition, employers must select the most practicable physical distancing measures for their particular working environment. Some of the most common courses of action include:

  • Organizing the workplace in accordance with appropriate distancing requirements, to minimize unnecessary close physical interaction between both employees and customers. The workplace must not be overcrowded, and employees and customers or clients should be able to sit or stand at least one meter apart. This may require the employer to rearrange desks and chairs and introduce floor markings to indicate where people should sit or stand;
  • Arranging staggered hours or shift work to reduce the number of employees working in the same space;
  • Preventing or restricting the shared use of office equipment; and,
  • Limiting the number of participants at gatherings or meetings to prevent overcrowding, as well as cutting back on the time spent on group activities.

Personal Hygiene

Maintaining the personal hygiene of employees is extremely important in preventing the spread of COVID-19. In addition to educating employees about how to prevent the spread of infection, employers should also ensure that employees have facilities to wash their hands properly and regularly with soap and water. Hand sanitizers or alcohol gel (with at least 70% alcohol) should also be provided in office common areas.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Employers should also make sure that their employees are wearing the appropriate PPE (such as surgical or cloth face masks, face shields and disposable gloves) when in common areas or public spaces in the workplace, and that customers or clients coming into the workplace also comply with these measures.  Even if face masks are worn, employers should remind employees to continue to strictly follow all other preventive measures (e.g., hand hygiene, physical distancing, etc.).

Employers should make an extra effort to educate personnel who have a higher risk of exposure to the virus (e.g., receptionists and maids) on hygiene measures and ensure that they have the appropriate PPE.

Cleaning and Disinfecting Work Facilities

Employers are advised to establish daily cleaning protocols to ensure that the workplace, workstations, equipment, and facilities are clean and sanitized. Additionally, cleaning staff should be trained and supplied with all the necessary cleaning agents and PPE to enable them to carry out their tasks.

The workplace premises should be frequently cleaned, and attention should be paid to areas that are frequently touched—elevator buttons, door handles, handrails, light switches, washbasin taps, soap dispensers, canteens, and so on. The keys, switches, and buttons of office equipment such as printers and photocopier should also be cleaned frequently.

Screening of Symptoms

Employers—especially those with high numbers of employees—are also encouraged to measure the body temperature of all employees before they enter the workplace in order to check whether they have a fever (37.5 degrees Celsius or above). When recording temperatures, employers should also be aware of data privacy considerations.

Employers may also require that employees disclose if they are at risk of being infected, have come into close contact with a person who is infected with the virus, or have any of the related symptoms.

There are important legal implications relating to the handling of the disease, as COVID-19 has been declared a dangerous communicable disease under the Communicable Disease Act. Thus, when employers learn of a known or suspected case of COVID-19 in the workplace, they are obligated to notify a communicable disease control officer unless they are unable to do so.

As the situation is changing rapidly, employers should be proactive in monitoring the requirements and recommendations issued by the Ministry of Public Health and the Department of Disease Control, as these may need to be incorporated into updated workplace policies and practices. Employees should always be kept clearly informed of all company policies and procedures relating to COVID-19.

Rapidly developing employment laws and regulations, coupled with the health and safety risks and potential penalties for failure to comply with the necessary procedures, render it essential for employers to plan effectively as they and their employees are forced to embrace the “new normal” that is taking shape in the post-COVID-19 economy. The effectiveness and success of employers’ transitions will largely depend on their ability to set out and implement plans to deal with these new and serious risks.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.