You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 11, 2020

COVID-19 and Returning to Work: Health and Safety Implications for Employers

Bangkok Post: Human Resources Watch

With the easing of lockdown restrictions in Thailand and the removal of stay-at-home orders, many employers have been proceeding with plans to transition employees from their temporary home offices back to the actual workplace.

The obligations of private sector employers to provide safe and hygienic working conditions for their employees are stipulated under Thailand’s Occupational Safety, Health and Environment Act. Employers are required to arrange and maintain their premises to support safe and healthy workforce operations and prevent any harm to the life, body, or mental or physical health of their employees.

In considering this current issue of transitioning their employees back to the workplace, employers must contemplate various issues, both from an employment law perspective and for the protection of employee health and safety. A safe return to the workplace for both employers and employees should proceed in tandem with preventive actions and mitigation of potential risks in the workplace.

To aid in this careful transition of employees back to the workplace, this article provides some general guidance for employers regarding health and safety practices, as well as consideration of some approaches to prevent COVID-19 transmission among personnel.

Physical Distancing in the Workplace

The unique challenges and risks posed by the current situation mean that implementing the necessary preventive measures may require substantial changes to workplace practices. To facilitate the transition, employers may find it practical to resume operations at the workplace on a gradual basis, determining which employees should return to work first to best ensure effective physical distancing.

In addition, employers must select the most practicable physical distancing measures for their particular working environment. Some of the most common courses of action include:

  • Organizing the workplace in accordance with appropriate distancing requirements, to minimize unnecessary close physical interaction between both employees and customers. The workplace must not be overcrowded, and employees and customers or clients should be able to sit or stand at least one meter apart. This may require the employer to rearrange desks and chairs and introduce floor markings to indicate where people should sit or stand;
  • Arranging staggered hours or shift work to reduce the number of employees working in the same space;
  • Preventing or restricting the shared use of office equipment; and,
  • Limiting the number of participants at gatherings or meetings to prevent overcrowding, as well as cutting back on the time spent on group activities.

Personal Hygiene

Maintaining the personal hygiene of employees is extremely important in preventing the spread of COVID-19. In addition to educating employees about how to prevent the spread of infection, employers should also ensure that employees have facilities to wash their hands properly and regularly with soap and water. Hand sanitizers or alcohol gel (with at least 70% alcohol) should also be provided in office common areas.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Employers should also make sure that their employees are wearing the appropriate PPE (such as surgical or cloth face masks, face shields and disposable gloves) when in common areas or public spaces in the workplace, and that customers or clients coming into the workplace also comply with these measures.  Even if face masks are worn, employers should remind employees to continue to strictly follow all other preventive measures (e.g., hand hygiene, physical distancing, etc.).

Employers should make an extra effort to educate personnel who have a higher risk of exposure to the virus (e.g., receptionists and maids) on hygiene measures and ensure that they have the appropriate PPE.

Cleaning and Disinfecting Work Facilities

Employers are advised to establish daily cleaning protocols to ensure that the workplace, workstations, equipment, and facilities are clean and sanitized. Additionally, cleaning staff should be trained and supplied with all the necessary cleaning agents and PPE to enable them to carry out their tasks.

The workplace premises should be frequently cleaned, and attention should be paid to areas that are frequently touched—elevator buttons, door handles, handrails, light switches, washbasin taps, soap dispensers, canteens, and so on. The keys, switches, and buttons of office equipment such as printers and photocopier should also be cleaned frequently.

Screening of Symptoms

Employers—especially those with high numbers of employees—are also encouraged to measure the body temperature of all employees before they enter the workplace in order to check whether they have a fever (37.5 degrees Celsius or above). When recording temperatures, employers should also be aware of data privacy considerations.

Employers may also require that employees disclose if they are at risk of being infected, have come into close contact with a person who is infected with the virus, or have any of the related symptoms.

There are important legal implications relating to the handling of the disease, as COVID-19 has been declared a dangerous communicable disease under the Communicable Disease Act. Thus, when employers learn of a known or suspected case of COVID-19 in the workplace, they are obligated to notify a communicable disease control officer unless they are unable to do so.

As the situation is changing rapidly, employers should be proactive in monitoring the requirements and recommendations issued by the Ministry of Public Health and the Department of Disease Control, as these may need to be incorporated into updated workplace policies and practices. Employees should always be kept clearly informed of all company policies and procedures relating to COVID-19.

Rapidly developing employment laws and regulations, coupled with the health and safety risks and potential penalties for failure to comply with the necessary procedures, render it essential for employers to plan effectively as they and their employees are forced to embrace the “new normal” that is taking shape in the post-COVID-19 economy. The effectiveness and success of employers’ transitions will largely depend on their ability to set out and implement plans to deal with these new and serious risks.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 30, 2026
Thailand’s cabinet has approved a draft ministerial regulation introducing significant changes to the calculation of old-age pension and old-age gratuity benefits under the Social Security Fund. The reform would replace the current pension calculation method with a career average revalued earnings (CARE) model designed to better reflect an individual’s lifetime contributions while supporting the long-term financial sustainability of the Social Security Fund. The changes are also intended to improve fairness and align Thailand’s pension framework with international practices. Key proposed changes under the draft ministerial regulation are outlined below. CARE-Based Formula for Old-Age Pension Calculations Currently, old-age pensions are calculated based on the insured person’s average salary over the preceding 60 months. The proposed regulation would replace this approach with the CARE model, under which pension benefits will be calculated based on earnings throughout an individual’s entire working life. Historical earnings will be revalued to reflect their present value before the pension benefit is calculated. According to the Ministry of Labor, this change is intended to better align pension benefits with an individual’s lifetime contribution history and provide a fairer basis for calculating benefits. Pension Accrual Rate for Contributions Exceeding 180 Months Under the current rules, insured persons who contribute for more than 180 months receive an additional pension accrual of 1.5% for each completed 12-month contribution period, with any remaining months disregarded. The proposed regulation would instead calculate the additional accrual on a monthly basis at a rate of 0.125% of actual monthly contributions; this aims to make pension benefits more accurately reflect the actual duration of each individual’s contribution history. Transitional Protections for Insured Persons The draft regulation includes transitional protections for both existing pension recipients and those who will become eligible within five years of the CARE model taking effect. For existing recipients, the following protections
June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,