You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 27, 2020

COVID-19 and Aircraft Leases: Lessor Options under Thai law

Subscribe to Updates

The COVID-19 outbreak has had a devastating effect on Thailand’s aviation industry. Both international and domestic flights have been dramatically curtailed or stopped altogether. When operations do resume, it is uncertain how many passengers will actually fly because of virus fears and economic impacts. Meanwhile, while airlines’ revenue drops, their expenses continue. A lack of cash flow has resulted in airlines resorting to laying off employees or having their employees take leave without pay.

Under these unprecedented social and economic conditions, airlines who lease aircraft may face severe challenges making rental and maintenance reserve payments to lessors. Lessors must be prepared for lessee defaults, and even bankruptcy. In such circumstances, lessors have a number of options under Thai law. 

Payment restructuring

Payment restructuring may be a viable option for lessors and lessees, depending on the terms of the lease agreement and the parties’ commercial positions. Under this option, a lessor and lessee can agree to restructure the amount and timing of rental and maintenance reserve payments. For example, a lessor may permit an airline to defer rental payments until an agreed upon future time when business is expected to improve. A lessor may also consider lowering the rental payments and applying the security deposit to make up the difference, or any combination that is doable for the parties. 

Thai law is flexible in this regard and recognizes the parties’ right to contract. The Thai courts and the Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand (CAAT) will generally allow any payment restructuring arrangement agreed by the parties, so long as the new arrangement forms a valid contract and does not contravene the law. As a practical matter, if there are any guarantee agreements associated with the lease, it is recommended that the guarantors give their consent to the new restructuring arrangement.   

Repossession

If a payment restructuring agreement cannot be reached, or is not a feasible option, a lessor may seek to repossess the aircraft upon a lessee’s default. Thailand’s normal repossession procedures would apply here. A lessor may apply to the CAAT to deregister the aircraft, or obtain the lessee’s consent to voluntarily deregister and return the aircraft. Obtaining a lessee’s consent is the fastest, easiest, and usually cheapest option. However, if the lessee refuses to return the aircraft, a lessor must seek CAAT intervention.

Pursuant to CAAT Regulation No. 11, which became effective on August 6, 2018, the director-general of the CAAT has authority to deregister an aircraft on various grounds, including if the lessee’s possessory right to the aircraft has expired for any of the following reasons:

  • The lease agreement has expired due to the lease term;
  • The lease agreement has been terminated by either the lessor or the lessee;
  • The lessor and lessee agree to terminate the lease agreement;
  • The lessor notifies the CAAT of the termination of the lease agreement and submits an irrevocable deregistration power of attorney to them, together with an application requesting the exportation of the aircraft.

If a lessee defaults and the lessor terminates the lease, the lessor can submit a deregistration application to the CAAT, which includes, among other things, a deregistration power of attorney. The CAAT will then examine the application and decide how to proceed. If the CAAT concludes that the lease termination is valid and the lessee no longer has possessory rights, the CAAT will deregister the aircraft.

Litigation

If the CAAT declines to deregister the aircraft, or if a lessor also wants to pursue monetary damages against a lessee, the lessor must initiate legal action by filing a complaint in a Thai court, as the CAAT does not have the authority to award damages under the lease. Thailand does not enforce foreign court judgments, and enforcing a foreign arbitral award in Thailand with respect to aircraft deregistration is problematic since the CAAT only has express legal authority to deregister an aircraft based on a Thai court order. 

The case would thus need to be litigated until either settlement or judgment. If the court orders the lessee to deregister, the lessee will have a fixed deadline to comply. If the lessee fails to comply with the judgment, the lessor can present the judgment to the CAAT. The CAAT will then deregister the aircraft.

An important consideration before commencing litigation is whether the lessee will have assets to pay any judgment. Freezing assets is challenging under Thai law, and the COVID-19 situation will also likely drive down a lessee’s assets. By the time a case reaches judgment, the airline may not have any assets for the lessor to enforce.

Force majeure 

Due to the extraordinary circumstances of the COVID-19 outbreak, a lessee-airline may raise force majeure as a defense for not making lease payments. Thai law defines force majeure as an event that a party is not able to protect against, despite taking the appropriate level of care that should be reasonably expected in such event. Under this definition, when a debtor owes a debt to a creditor, the debtor is responsible to pay the debt, even during a disaster or economic crisis, since a disaster or economic crisis does not make it impossible to pay the amount owed.

However, if the debtor’s business is forced to close because of the law or a government order, and the debtor cannot pay its debt as scheduled, this could be considered an event that temporarily prevents the performance of the obligation. A debtor may raise this issue as a defense for default. A lessor must therefore carefully examine the circumstances of each lessee default to determine if force majeure truly applies. For example, if the lessee’s default was a direct result of the CAAT’s grounding of all of the lessee’s flights, force majeure may be invoked. If the lessee defaulted because of the economic crisis resulting from COVID-19 however, force majeure may not apply. 

Bankruptcy

Lessors should also consider the possibility that an airline may use bankruptcy law to seek protection. An airline may file a petition for business rehabilitation (i.e., reorganization) with the Central Bankruptcy Court. Under Thai bankruptcy law, an automatic stay on civil actions is imposed when the Bankruptcy Court accepts the rehabilitation petition. (The court’s acceptance of the petition does not mean that it is granting or allowing the airlines to enter rehabilitation. It just means that the court has agreed to decide whether to allow the airlines to enter rehabilitation.) 

The automatic stay also suspends all civil court proceedings against the debtor. The automatic stay will end if:

  1. the Bankruptcy Court dismisses the rehabilitation petition;
  2. the rehabilitation plan fails; or
  3. the rehabilitation plan succeeds and there is no need for a further automatic stay.

If the Bankruptcy Court allows an airline to enter rehabilitation, the automatic stay could potentially last for years while the rehabilitation plan is implemented.

The lessor has the option to object to the airline’s rehabilitation petition. If the lessor’s objection is successful, the court will dismiss the airline’s petition, and the lessor can repossess the aircraft. If the lessor chooses not to object, it can submit a claim as a creditor and join the rehabilitation process until the case’s conclusion. However, unless the lease term expires through the passage of time, the lessor cannot request the return of the aircraft from the Bankruptcy Court while the automatic stay is in place. 

Thai government measures 

The COVID-19 outbreak has upended the global aviation industry, Thailand included. To help support Thai airlines during this difficult time, the government has implemented the following assistance measures:   

  • 50% reduction in landing and parking fees for all Thai and foreign airlines from April 1 to December 31, 2020.
  • 50% reduction of the air navigation service charge for domestic flights and 20% for international flights.
  • Reduction of arrival and departure fee from THB 15 to THB 10 per passenger for all Thai and foreign airlines.
  • Reduction in jet fuel excise for domestic flights for Thai airlines from THB 4.726 (USD 0.15) per liter, which had been the rate for 24 years, to THB 0.20 (USD 0.01) per liter, up to the end of this year.
  • 50% reduction in office rental fees for Thai airlines.

In addition to the above aviation-specific measures, the government has also launched an overall corporate assistance package, including loan payment holidays, soft loans, and other fiscal and monetary incentives. Time will tell if these measures prove to be effective. However, in the meantime, lessors should consider preparing plans in case of default by their Thai airline customers.

Related Professionals

Industries

Aviation

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 8, 2021
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the aviation industry to face arguably the most challenging time in its history. Airlines across the world, including in Southeast Asia, have been deeply affected by the prolonged and universal halt to international air travel. Domestic flights have provided some much-needed revenue to local carriers. But with multiple and unforeseen waves of new virus cases, lockdowns and other travel restrictions, and a public generally fearful of travelling, domestic flights have not been enough to make up for the massive shortfall in revenue lost from international air travel. Despite all the current gloom for the aviation industry, there may be light at the end of the tunnel as the world glimpses life after the pandemic. This is mainly down to vaccinations. With people confined to their homes for over a year in many Western countries, there is pent-up demand to travel. As those people are vaccinated, they will want to get out of their houses and fly somewhere. Moreover, household savings have increased for those fortunate enough to be working throughout the pandemic in their homes, and with few options to go out and spend. This combination of travel demand and increased disposable income is a strong combination for positive growth in the post-pandemic aviation industry. In the context of Vietnam, which to date has managed to minimize outbreaks from occurring in the country, from around the middle of September 2020 airlines announced to fly again and increase the frequency of many domestic flights. Airlines also sought to restore some international commercial routes to meet the needs of passengers, contribute to connecting trade, and maintaining production and business activities. However, despite domestic demand, true recovery and economic success can only occur when passengers can again travel internationally, both inbound and outbound. As such, the critical
Read More
April 19, 2021
Thailand has made significant changes to its statutory interest rate framework for the first time in almost a century. Since 1925, the statutory interest rate codified in Thailand’s Civil and Commercial Code (the CCC) has remained at 7.5% per year. But with Covid-19 having an unprecedented impact on the Thai economy, the Thai Government, via emergency decree, has reduced the statutory rate. While the decree is largely aimed at providing relief to hard-hit SMEs and individual debtors, the amendments have broader implications for doing business in Thailand. Main Changes The new interest rate revisions are contained within the Emergency Decree Amending the Civil and Commercial Code B.E. 2564 (2021) (the Emergency Decree), which was published in the Government Gazette on April 10, 2021 and came into effect on April 11, 2021. The Emergency Decree amends Sections 7 and 224 of the CCC, which stated the previous statutory interest rate of 7.5% per year. The Emergency Decree makes three major changes. The first involves a reduction of the statutory interest rate from 7.5% per year to 3% per year in Section 7. The new 3% annual rate is subject to review every three years by the Ministry of Finance. The interest rate is subject to further change later by a royal decree. The second change concerns money debts under Section 224 of the CCC. The previous version of Section 224 stated, among other things, that a money debt based on a default bears interest of 7.5% per year. Under the Emergency Decree, the new actual statutory default interest rate is the statutory interest rate stated in Section 7 with an additional rate of 2% per year. The result is a 5% annual statutory default interest rate. Since the statutory default interest rate is based in part on the Section 7
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More