You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 9, 2026

Court Judgment Reaffirms Rules on Advertising of Medical Facilities in Thailand

Subscribe to Updates

On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars.

The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible.

Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest.

While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims.

Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements

Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016).

The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social media, and other digital marketing channels.

Prior Approval Requirement

Section 38 of the Medical Facility Act requires medical facilities to obtain approval from the DoHSS before publishing any advertisement relating to the facility.

The only statutory exception is where the communication contains solely the medical facility’s name and location exactly as stated in its license.

Section 38 also expressly prohibits advertisements containing false, exaggerated, deceptive, or misleading statements—regarding the medical facility’s name or location, the medical services offered, the qualifications of healthcare professionals, or the competence or capabilities of healthcare personnel—that are intended to induce individuals to use the facility’s services.

The recent acne scar treatment case demonstrates the risk associated with claims that promise specific results, represent a doctor as possessing special expertise without adequate substantiation, or suggest that a treatment can permanently cure a condition.

Advertisements Exempt from Prior Approval

The 2019 notification permits certain information to be displayed within the medical facility premises without obtaining prior approval, including:

  • Abbreviations, trade names, logos, and symbols
  • Qualifications of healthcare professionals
  • Service fees and pricing information
  • Patient rights information
  • Lists of medical services and operating hours
  • Medical and public health knowledge, research findings, and educational content (subject to prescribed warning statements)
  • Announcements concerning facility activities, relocation, destruction of records, or commemorative events

Advertisements That May Be Approved

Advertisements outside the exemption categories require approval before publication. The DoHSS may approve advertisements that contain the following promotional elements, provided specific conditions are met:

  • Free medical services. Advertisements promoting free services must clearly state the date and time, the location, and the scope of the services offered.
  • Gifts, exchanges, benefits, prizes, or lucky draws. These may be offered only if the service recipient is the direct beneficiary and the medical service provided is not below the general standard.
  • Discounts on non-medical services. These may be offered only if the service recipient is the direct beneficiary.
  • Discounts on medical services. These may be offered for a period of up to one year.

Application Procedures

The approval process depends on the location of the medical facility.

  • For facilities located in Bangkok, applications must be submitted to the Center of Healthcare Advertising Approval (CHAA) within the DoHSS. Applications may be filed in person or by post. According to the CHAA website, straightforward applications involving text or still images may be approved within approximately five to seven working days after complete documentation is submitted.
  • For facilities located outside Bangkok, applications must be submitted to the relevant Provincial Public Health Office.

Penalties for Noncompliance

Failure to obtain prior approval may result in a fine of up to THB 20,000 and an additional daily fine of up to THB 10,000 for failure to comply with an order requiring the advertisement to be removed.

Advertisements that are false, exaggerated, deceptive, or misleading carry more severe penalties: imprisonment of up to one year, a fine of up to THB 20,000, or both. Additional daily fines of up to THB 10,000 may also be imposed until the offending advertisement is withdrawn.

Increased Enforcement Against Repeat Offenders

According to recent statements from the DoHSS, enforcement against repeat offenders is becoming increasingly stringent. The department reportedly applies an escalating penalty approach:

  • First violation: approximately 25 percent of the maximum fine
  • Second violation: approximately 50 percent
  • Third violation: approximately 75 percent
  • Fourth violation: referral for criminal prosecution

Importantly, the authority currently considers each advertising platform separately. In other words, violations are generally assessed by channel rather than by the number of individual posts. However, authorities have indicated that future enforcement may consider each prohibited claim separately, potentially increasing exposure significantly, including the risk that serious or repeated violations may give rise not only to civil claims but also to criminal complaints or prosecution.

The DoHSS is also reportedly considering introducing informer reward mechanisms for advertising violations, although the proposal remains under review. If adopted, such mechanisms could further increase the likelihood of complaints being filed, including potential criminal complaints in cases involving false, exaggerated, deceptive, or misleading advertising.

As enforcement activity continues to increase, the distinction between aggressive marketing and unlawful advertising is becoming increasingly important. A misleading claim may not only result in regulatory penalties but may also expose the clinic, its directors, and treating healthcare professionals to civil claims from dissatisfied patients and, where the facts support it, to criminal complaints or prosecution under the applicable statutory framework.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 5, 2026
On December 31, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) issued Circular No. 57/2025/TT-BYT providing guidance on the classification of medical devices according to technical standards and quality requirements (Circular 57), applicable to procurement activities for medical devices in Vietnam. According to the MOH, the purpose of the classification is to establish a principle-based legal framework and regulations that enable purchasers to easily identify groups of medical devices aligned with their professional requirements and financial capacity. Some of the key stipulations of Circular 57 are outlined below. Basis for Determining Technical Standards and Quality Under Circular 57, the technical standards of medical devices are determined in accordance with Vietnamese laws on standards and technical regulations, through the following means: Certification of conformity with standards in accordance with Vietnamese laws on standards and technical regulations; Results of conformity assessment conducted by an internationally recognized conformity assessment organization or a legally established domestic or foreign conformity assessment organization operating in Vietnam; and Documentation evidencing compliance provided by the medical device owner. The quality of medical devices is determined based on whether the device has been approved for circulation by the relevant marketing authority of one or more jurisdictions. Classification of Medical Devices Circular 57 classifies medical devices into six groups (from Group 1 to Group 6) based on technical standards and quality. Medical devices subject to classification must simultaneously meet technical standards and quality requirements in accordance with professional specifications and user needs, and must be lawfully marketed in Vietnam. Medical devices manufactured in Vietnam may participate in all corresponding groups, provided they meet the technical standards required by the user and are lawfully marketed in Vietnam. Outlook Circular No. 57 will take effect on February 15, 2026, while the classification requirements will become effective on January 1, 2027. Holders of medical
Read More
December 30, 2025
The Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office), with support from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), is drafting additional annexes to its Guidelines for Patent Examination, focusing on the examination of patent applications in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. The new annexes are expected to be officially issued in early 2026 as Annexes III and IV, following the successful issuance in 2023 of Annexes I and II addressing computer program-related inventions. The IP Office recently organized a seminar to gather feedback on the draft annexes from intellectual property representatives, academic institutions, research institutes, and other interested parties, emphasizing its intention to receive further constructive opinions to refine the guidelines for pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Why These Guidelines Matter Patent examination in Vietnam has traditionally relied on the Guidelines for Patent Examination issued under Decision No. 487/QD-SHTT (2010), recently supplemented by Annexes I and II. While these documents provide a solid foundation, they do not fully address practical challenges in examining pharmaceutical and biotech inventions, particularly issues related to clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, enablement, features of function and utility, combination therapies, and inventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) applications in these fields. Annexes III and IV aim to close these gaps by introducing structured principles and illustrative examples. Guidance on Patent Specification Requirements Annex III provides detailed guidance on the requirements for patent specifications in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, covering two main parts: Part A addresses sufficiency of disclosure, clarity of specifications, and consistency between claims and descriptions. Part B covers inventions related to Markush-type compounds, claims containing exclusion statements (disclaimers), and additional experimental data submitted during examination. The Guidelines outline specific disclosure requirements for subject matters such as compounds, formulations, pharmaceutical compositions, genes, polypeptides, proteins, vectors, transgenic organisms, modified organisms, and hybrid cells. Annex III emphasizes that disclaimers are not accepted
Read More
November 25, 2025
Food safety incidents can emerge without warning, requiring businesses to act swiftly to protect consumers and comply with regulatory obligations. Across Southeast Asia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia have each developed comprehensive food recall frameworks designed to ensure rapid removal of unsafe products from the market while holding businesses accountable for compliance failures. While these three jurisdictions share common objectives—protecting public health and ensuring food safety—each has crafted distinct regulatory approaches reflecting their unique administrative structures, enforcement priorities, and legal traditions. Understanding these differences is essential for food businesses operating in the region, as recall procedures, timelines, reporting requirements, and penalties vary significantly across borders. This guide, available through the button below, examines the food recall regulations in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, providing practical guidance on legal requirements, procedural steps, and compliance obligations in each market.
Read More