You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 29, 2013

Company Directors in Thailand: Your Questions Answered

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Directors and officers of both local and multinational companies in Thailand are subject to a complex array of legal duties and obligations. When things go wrong, company executives may find themselves named personally in civil suits, regulatory investigations, and criminal prosecutions, putting their assets and their livelihoods at risk. Understanding the local legal and regulatory environment is therefore essential for any director or executive working in Thailand. This article aims to answer some of the most common questions posed by directors.

Can I be sued? Yes. A breach of your duties could result in civil proceedings being issued against you personally as a director of the company. Depending on the nature of the alleged breach, proceedings could be brought by the company itself, its shareholders, employees, creditors, customers, or consumers. In Thailand, it is not unusual for third parties to sue the directors and officers at the same time as suing the company.

Can I be prosecuted? Yes. Thai law imposes criminal liability on company directors in many circumstances. Examples of statutory crimes relating to the corporate affairs of public companies include the issuance of false statements or the omission of financial data under the Public Company Limited Act, and insider trading under the Securities and Exchange Act. More than 100 further statutes in Thailand impose criminal sanctions on directors for specific acts and omissions. The penalties for committing such criminal offences can be imprisonment, fines, or both.

Can I be questioned and can my home be searched? Yes. Government authorities have broad powers to gather information, issue written orders, summon witnesses to provide statements, and request documents. A government official can demand that a company employee produce documents under the circumstances of an investigation and raid the home or office of an employee to seize documents with a proper search warrant.

Enforcement authorities can also demand that an employee, officer, director, or any other responsible person of a company submit to questioning in order to ascertain the circumstances of the alleged offence.

The person being questioned, however, has a constitutional right not to make self-incriminating statements. It is therefore essential to obtain legal advice and representation immediately upon the enforcement authority’s arrival at the company’s premises or the employee’s home, or upon receiving a request for documents or questioning.

Can I be liable for the company’s acts? Yes. Many statutory corporate criminal liability laws presume that the managing partners, president, directors, managers, or empowered persons shall be co-principals in the commission of an offence. If the entity becomes liable for a crime or the employee acted on his or her personal behalf, without authority or beyond the scope of his or her authority, the individual will be personally liable, unless they can show the offence was committed without their knowledge or consent, or they acted reasonably in preventing the offence.

What about bribery? Bribery is a criminal offence under Section 144 of the Penal Code, and is broadly defined as “giving, offering, or agreeing to give the property or any other benefit to an official so as to induce such person to do or not to do any act, or to delay the doing of any act contrary to one’s own duty”.

Are there any special laws governing foreigners? Yes. Under the Foreign Business Act, almost all business activities (except manufacturing) are reserved. Foreign shareholdings in reserved businesses are required to be below 50%, and, in certain sectors, less. Using a Thai “nominee shareholder” as a way to circumvent the requirements of the Act is a criminal offence, and the Act contains an express criminal liability provision affecting directors.

Under the Alien Employment Act, it is illegal for foreigners to work without a work permit, and for a company to employ a foreigner without a work permit. Directors working without a permit, or employing foreigners without permits may therefore be punished by imprisonment and/or a fine.

How do I protect myself? Legal proceedings are always better avoided than defended, and companies operating in Thailand should therefore put in place adequate systems to ensure compliance, including reliable record-keeping, training for directors, and access to legal advice where required. In the event that legal proceedings are instigated — or expected — immediate access to reliable legal representation is of the essence. Thai court deadlines are generally very short, and no communication with prosecutors or investigators should be entered into without suitable legal advice.

Financial protection can be provided by directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which generally provides cover for costs and liabilities arising from civil suits, regulatory investigations, and criminal prosecutions. The extent of cover available varies between providers, and policy wordings should therefore be carefully checked to ensure that the broadest permissible cover is in place.

Directors of multinational corporations with global directors’ and officers’ liability insurance cover in place should also check whether this includes a policy issued locally in Thailand, since unlicensed overseas insurers will be prevented from directly assisting and indemnifying directors facing claims in Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 11, 2026
Cambodia’s Ministry of Justice has launched a new platform on its official website to publish notices of forced sales issued by each municipal and provincial court of first instance. The platform’s stated purpose is to inform the public and facilitate greater participation in forced-sale auctions conducted in connection with court-ordered enforcement proceedings. How the Platform Works The platform publishes forced-sale notices from courts of first instance across Cambodia’s municipalities and provinces and includes a link where the public can view properties currently subject to forced sale. To participate in a forced-sale auction, individuals can download Khmer-language bidding application forms through links provided on the platform. The form typically requires the applicant’s name, sex, year of birth, identity card number and issue date, and address, together with details identifying the immovable property (including its ownership certificate number), the relevant enforcement case number and date, and the reference to the public auction or tender announcement issued by the court. Completed application forms must be submitted directly to the specific municipal or provincial court that issued the forced sale. For further inquiries about a particular forced sale, interested parties should likewise contact the relevant municipal or provincial court. Forced Sale of Immovable Property in Cambodia The publication of these notices relates to the forced sale procedure for immovable property under Cambodia’s Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). Unlike property seizure by a court, a forced sale is a compulsory execution proceeding—a subsequent enforcement step that arises only after an underlying dispute has been adjudicated and a debtor fails to pay the debt or outstanding amount due under a final and binding judgment or other enforceable title of execution. For the purposes of this procedure, the term “immovable property” under the CPC refers to land, registered buildings, jointly held shares of such property, registered
August 6, 2026
Every month, VAT-registered businesses in Thailand calculate their output and input VAT and file a return to pay the net amount due or claim a refund. Yet a common and costly dispute arises when a business that has paid input VAT to its supplier—and done everything asked of it—later finds that input VAT rejected on the grounds that the tax invoice was issued by “a person not entitled to issue tax invoices.” In these cases, a buyer may have confirmed the supplier’s VAT registration on the Revenue Department’s website, paid through the banking system, received a complete tax invoice, and kept full payment and inventory records. Even so, if the Revenue Department later determines that the supplier did not genuinely make the sale or collected the VAT without remitting it, the department can disallow the input VAT and assess additional tax, surcharge, and penalty—often more than a year after the transaction. A new article from tax and dispute resolution specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok examines how the Revenue Department and the courts approach these disputes, including two recent Supreme Court (Tax Division) decisions confirming that the taxpayer bears the burden of proving a supplier genuinely sold and delivered the goods and received payment. It considers why the VAT registration system offers no legal safe harbor, why the evidentiary burden falls hardest on online and cross-border transactions where buyers and sellers never meet, and how the Revenue Department’s own digital infrastructure could detect non-remitting suppliers at the source rather than shifting the loss to good-faith buyers. The article also sets out practical guidance: how to build a comprehensive “know-your-supplier” file at the time of a transaction, the procedural steps and strict deadlines for challenging a VAT assessment, and why dispute readiness belongs alongside tax planning at the center
July 15, 2026
On July 8, 2026, Thailand enacted a new law significantly expanding the framework for government service delivery and licensing facilitation. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Services Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Facilitation Act 2026) replaces and expands the framework of governmental services under the Facilitation of Official Licensing Consideration Act B.E. 2558 (2015) (Facilitation Act 2015) and broadens its scope to cover public services, administrative processes, and public benefits. The Facilitation Act 2026 aims to modernize government services by promoting e-filing, reducing administrative burdens and repeated document requests, and improving predictability. For businesses, this should ease compliance and shorten approval timelines, subject to implementing regulations and agency readiness. Public Services Facilitation Scope The Facilitation Act 2015 applied mainly to permissions, registrations, and notifications required before conducting activities that require licenses, certificates, permits, approvals, or registrations. The Facilitation Act 2026 broadens this framework to include public services and other benefits, such as welfare, subsidies, and grants, provided to Thai citizens, expanding government agencies’ responsibilities beyond licensing facilitation into a wider administrative-service framework. It also introduces a broader definition of “government agency” to include central, regional, and local government bodies, state enterprises, public organizations, and other state entities. Licensing Changes The Facilitation Act 2026 introduces a “super license” (termed a “main license” under the act) that exempts the holder from obtaining multiple related or ancillary licenses issued by different government agencies. Obtaining a super license deems the licensee to have automatically obtained the related “sublicenses” required to conduct the relevant activities. The cabinet will designate eligible activities by royal decree. The act also introduces an expedited licensing option, allowing applicants to pay an additional fee to fast-track their applications in urgent cases. Expedited processing must not interfere with standard application timelines. The criteria, procedures, conditions, and fees for expedited licensing
July 10, 2026
Vietnam has taken a significant step in regulating its e-commerce sector with the issuance of a new decree guiding the country’s recently enacted Law on E-Commerce. Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP, issued on June 30, 2026, and taking effect the following day, addresses mandatory platform policies, registration requirements for offshore platforms, additional obligations on platform operators, and market access conditions for foreign investors. Mandatory Policy Contents The decree sets out detailed guidance on the required contents of various platform policies, covering pricing, payment, display priority, livestream sales, delivery, returns, method of service provision, and service termination and refunds. Clarification of Obligations for Platform Operators The decree provides clarification of the obligations applicable to platform operators. Notably, intermediary e-commerce platform operators with online ordering functions must: Collect specific information to implement electronic identity verification of sellers; Cooperate with regulators by reporting online through the state e-commerce management system and by blocking, suspending, or removing content upon request of a competent authority; Maintain a mechanism to store contract data, including price, product or service information, and parties’ information, for at least three years from the date of contract conclusion; and If qualifying as a “large digital platform” under consumer protection law, maintain an online system for receiving and handling complaints and requests, and comply with enhanced content-removal requirements. Registration Requirements for Offshore Platforms Offshore e-commerce platforms, whether direct-sales, intermediary, social-network-based, or integrated, that conduct e-commerce activity in Vietnam must register with the Ministry of Industry and Trade if the platform: Allows Vietnamese-language selection; Uses a “.vn” domain; or Reaches 100,000 or more transactions with Vietnam-based buyers within a calendar year. Notably, the registration requirement now captures not only traditional intermediary platforms, but also direct-sales platforms. Foreign Investment Conditions Foreign investors holding a controlling interest in an intermediary e-commerce platform, a social media platform