You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 30, 2012

Commercial Lease Agreements and Thai Law

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Long-term lease agreements in Thailand are generally limited to a maximum term of 30 years and may then be renewed for another 30-year term under Section 540 of the Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand.

Under certain circumstances, however, the Lease of Immovable Property for Commercial or Industrial Purposes Act of 1999 grants a maximum lease term of 30-50 years if the lease has an industrial or commercial purpose. After this initial term, an extension of 30-50 years is possible. Similar to an ordinary long-term lease, this extension term can only be registered after the initial term has already lapsed.

Regional Comparisons

Thailand’s neighbors have similar regulations, but the duration of the maximum lease term is generally longer. In Vietnam, for example, the term for an ordinary lease can be up to 50 years, and even up to 70 years in specific areas with approval from the prime minister.

The lease rules and terms in Laos are slightly more diverse. As in Thailand, the ordinary lease term is 30 years with an option for extension and 50 years with an option for extension for investment and business activities, based on the scale of the project. Laos also allows 75 years in specific economic zones and up to 99 years for diplomatic purposes or international organizations.

In Cambodia, the laws allow for a 99-year lease term, while foreign companies with privileges from the Cambodia Investment Board and the Cambodia Development Council may even be permitted to own the land on which they are building factories. Malaysia also allows a maximum lease term of 99 years. Under Myanmar’s new foreign investment law, foreign companies will be allowed to lease land for up to 50 years, with up to two possible extensions of 10 years each.

Eligibility

Although Thailand’s maximum commercial lease term of 30-50 years falls short of those in some of its neighbors, investors are nevertheless eager to seek such arrangements. To be eligible for a maximum commercial lease term in Thailand, a number of conditions must be met.

The leased property must be located in an area specified for industrial or commercial purposes or in an industrial estate zone. The lessee can be an individual person or a company, either of Thai or foreign nationality.

If the purpose of the lease is commercial, the commerce must show an investment of at least 20 million baht. If the purpose of the lease is industrial, it must be a type of industry that would be eligible to apply for investment promotion under Thailand’s Investment Promotion Act and related laws. Alternatively, a commercial or industrial enterprise that has been announced and published by the Interior Minister as being beneficial to Thailand’s economy and society is also eligible to register a commercial lease.

If a non-Thai person or entity is applying for registration of a commercial lease, the operated business must be one that is not prohibited to foreigners under the Foreign Business Act. Non-Thais are additionally required to provide evidence they brought funds for the investment into Thailand in foreign currency, have funds in a foreign currency account, or have funds in a baht account of a non-resident.

Another important requirement is the work plan that each applicant has to submit to the Land Department along with the application form, a report on environmental impact, and a certificate issued by the Public Works and Town & Country Planning Department. The latter confirms the land to be leased is located in a commercial or industrial area or an industrial estate.

The work plan must contain details about the land exploitation plan, the amount and the source of the capital fund, employment, and a time frame for the business operation. Once the lease has been successfully registered with the Land Department, the lessee must proceed with the work plan within 90 days, under full compliance with the conditions laid down in the registration.

If the plot of land to be leased exceeds 100 rai in size, additional conditions apply: the local council where the land is located must be given the opportunity to comment on the application of the lease, and only businesses that are beneficial for Thailand’s exports, employment situation, or manufacturing technology—or are otherwise necessary or beneficial to the country’s economy and society—are eligible to register such a commercial lease. If the lessee is non-Thai, the minimum investment amount must be 100 million baht or more.

Advantages

Of course, the key advantage that commercial leases have over ordinary leases is the longer lease term. But there are other advantages as well. The lease for commercial or industrial purposes can be mortgaged as a security for financing, which an ordinary lease of property cannot. And if the lessee is an individual person, his heirs are able to inherit the rights and obligations from the lease after his passing.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
Read More
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
Read More
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
Read More
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
Read More