You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 5, 2023

Changes Coming Soon for Vietnam’s Consumer Protection Law

Vietnam’s Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights (“Consumer Protection Law” or “CPL”) was passed in 2010 and has been effective since July 1, 2011, providing a legal framework for protecting the rights of consumers in Vietnam. Over the past 12 years of implementation and application, however, the CPL has revealed its shortcomings and limitations. For example, there are issues related to inconsistency between the CPL and other laws such as the Civil Code, Law on Competition, Enterprise Law, and Cybersecurity Law. The current CPL also has not kept pace with modern consumption practices, especially the rapid changes and emerging trends in e-commerce, cross-border transactions, and services via digital platforms. The government of Vietnam has therefore entrusted the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) to take the lead in drafting a new amended CPL to replace the old one, to improve the policies and legislation on consumer protection, and protect the vulnerabilities of consumers in transactions with businesses.

During the 5th session of the National Assembly at the end of May 2023, the National Assembly discussed and reviewed the latest draft of the CPL (“Draft CPL”), which is expected to be approved on June 21, 2023. The following are some key contents of the Draft CPL:

1. Revised Subjects of Application

Unlike the current CPL, which applies only to consumers; traders of goods and services; and agencies, organizations and individuals involved in consumer protection activities within the territory of Vietnam, the Draft CPL adds “the Vietnamese Fatherland Front, socio-political organizations and social organizations participating in protecting consumers’ interests” as new subjects of its application, and clarifies that “agencies, organizations, and individuals” include both domestic and offshore agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in activities of consumer rights protection. The Draft CPL also removes “within the territory of Vietnam” from the definition of the subjects of its application in order to expand the application to foreign organizations and companies which were established under foreign law. In other words, such foreign entities might be subject to the Draft CPL and must bear responsibility to consumers.

The Draft CPL revises the definition of “consumer” as “a person who buys and uses products, goods, and services for consumption and daily living purposes of individuals, families, or organizations, and not for commercial purposes” (underlined part added). However, it does not specify whether these “consumers” are Vietnamese and foreign consumers who are living in Vietnam; whether they can be Vietnamese citizens who are living overseas; or whether they can be foreign citizens who are buying from Vietnamese entities. The government may need to give further details to clarify the scope of application of “consumer” to avoid any confusion regarding the application of the CPL in practice.

Further, though this definition explicitly includes “not for commercial purposes,” the Draft CPL does not provide any explanation of what constitutes “commercial purposes.” Therefore, we might need to refer to the definition of “commercial activities” under the Commercial Law to interpret “commercial purposes.” Understanding “commercial purposes” is very important to verify whether activities will be subject to the CPL or other laws (e.g., the Commercial Law).

2. New Regulations on Product Recall

Under the Draft CPL, when a trader discovers that its goods are defective, it must carry out a recall.

The Draft CPL defines defective goods as “goods that fail to ensure the safety of consumers and which could cause damage to their lives, health, or property but for which the defect was undiscoverable at the time the goods were supplied to consumers even though such goods were manufactured correctly in accordance with current technical standards or criteria, including:

  1. Mass-produced goods in which a defect arises from a technical design;
  2. Singly produced goods in which a defect arises out of the process of manufacturing, processing, transportation, storage, and use;
  3. Goods with the potential to cause a loss of safety during use but which fail to have adequate instructions or warnings for consumers.

While this definition is largely the same as the one found in the current CPL, the Draft CPL further divides these “defective goods” into three groups:

  • Defective goods capable of causing damage to the health and life of consumers (Group A);
  • Defective goods capable of causing damage to consumers’ property (Group B); and
  • Defective goods capable of causing damage to the health, life and property of consumers, for which the regulations applicable to Group A will apply.

In general, the Draft CPL imposes different responsibilities on traders for each of these groups; thus, it is critical that the traders correctly identify the group of defective goods.

Another key note is that upon discovering the goods are defective, the trader must notify the relevant authorities of the defective goods and the recall, both before and after the recall. This is a bright spot of the Draft CPL in comparison to the old CPL and the current practice of handling recall notices of consumer protection agencies, as it is clearer about the responsibility of traders when discovering defective products and the time to report on the recall to the authority.

The Draft CPL also sets out that if more than one business entity causes damage to the consumer at the same time, such business entities must jointly compensate the consumer.

3. Protection of Consumer Information

In compliance with recent Vietnamese regulations on personal data protection, the Draft CPL sets out new provisions on the protection of consumer information, with some key points as below:

  • The Draft CPL introduces a new definition of “consumer information,” which includes consumers’ personal information, information about their process of purchasing and using products, goods and services, and other information related to transactions between consumers and traders.
  • The collection, storage, use, modification, updating, or destruction of consumer information must ensure the safety and security of consumer information.
  • Traders collecting, storing, or using consumer information must build and apply consumer information protection rules that cover the following contents: (i) purpose of information collection; (ii) scope of information use; (iii) information storage period; and (iv) measures to protect information and ensure consumer information safety. These rules must be publicly announced in a conspicuous place at the head office and business locations, and on any websites and apps for consumers to easily review prior to or at the time of information collection.
  • Before storing or using consumer information, traders must inform consumers clearly, publicly, and in a suitable method about the purpose and scope of information collection and use, as well as the storage period of the information, and must obtain consent from the consumer, except for the case of collecting information that has been made public by consumers or in other cases as prescribed by law.
  • Traders are required to establish a mechanism to duly obtain affirmative opt-in consent from consumers for certain activities such as sharing their information to third parties or for marketing purposes.
  • Traders must destroy consumer information when the storage period expires.
  • The Draft CPL supplements regulations on the responsibility to notify authorities within 24 hours when there is an attack on an information system that causes a risk of information loss.

4. New Regulations on Vulnerable Consumers

To improve the effectiveness of rights protection for groups of consumers who are more disadvantaged than ordinary consumers, the Draft CPL has introduced the definition of “vulnerable consumers,” which are “consumers who at the time of purchase or use of products, goods or services are likely to be subject to many adverse impacts in terms of access to information, health, property, and dispute settlement, including:

a) The elderly according to the provisions of laws on the elderly;

b) Persons with disabilities as prescribed by the laws on disabled persons;

c) Children in accordance with the laws on children;

d) Ethnic minority people; people living in ethnic minority and mountainous areas, islands, areas with difficult socio-economic conditions, and areas with extremely difficult socio-economic conditions as prescribed by law;

dd) Women who are pregnant or nursing a child under 12 months old;

e) Persons suffering from serious diseases as prescribed by law;

g) Members of poor households as prescribed by law.

The Draft CPL provides regulations on the responsibilities of traders in protecting the interests of vulnerable consumers, with some examples as below:

  • Traders must give priority to receiving, processing and handling legal claims from vulnerable consumers, and not transfer consumer requests to a third party for settlement, unless such third party has related obligations.
  • Traders are not allowed to refuse to settle complaints or requests for dispute settlement of vulnerable consumers for reasons of differences in language, writing, customs, or practices.
  • Traders must avoid stigmatization, discrimination, and taking advantage of vulnerabilities to infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of vulnerable consumers.
  • Traders must build internal rules and procedures to handle complaints or requests for dispute settlement from vulnerable consumers.

5. Other notable provisions

In addition to the essential regulations listed above, businesses should also note some other new provisions.

The Draft CPL provides additional regulations on some specific transactions, such as regulations on transactions in cyberspace and additional regulations on direct sales (door-to-door sales; multi-level marketing, and selling at a location that is not a regular transaction location).

For handling disputes between consumers and traders, the Draft CPL supplements new regulations on:

  • Allowing the choice of direct or online dispute resolution methods in cases where it is required by law.
  • The responsibilities of relevant parties for providing information during the dispute settlement process.
  • The responsibility of state management agencies and social organizations participating in the protection of consumer rights for keeping information and documents provided confidential in accordance with the law.
  • The order and procedures for mediation to comply with the laws on commercial mediation.
  • Settling civil cases on the protection of consumer rights according to the summary procedures prescribed in the Civil Procedure Code when the provisions of Article 317.1 of the Civil Procedure Code are satisfied or when specific conditions are met.

The Draft CPL also provides the definition of “influential people” and their responsibilities when introducing goods and products to consumers.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 4, 2021
E-commerce platforms have become some of the most significant marketplaces in Thailand, with millions of daily business transactions and huge numbers of online users. The increasing number of online shops operating on e-commerce platforms requires new techniques to be employed in online IP rights infringement cases. Both the private sector and the government have developed tools to enhance online IP enforcement, including ones using the latest legal technologies and artificial intelligence (AI). Many legal technologies and AI operations are still nascent and typically do not yet offer the best approach for online IP rights enforcement. For example, AI and other technologies available today are still unable to consistently differentiate between original and counterfeit products from the images and information displayed on the e-commerce platforms and the internet. Therefore, some of the most effective measures for online IP enforcement still involve manual online searches by experienced local investigators with deep understanding of the behaviors of local users (both sellers and buyers) and the ability to link relevant information across online platforms. Thailand’s Department of Intellectual Property (DIP), as the governmental office responsible for IP-related matters in Thailand, has initiated its new Memorandum of Understanding on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights on the Internet. This memorandum of understanding (MOU) does not create additional rights for IP owners, but acts as a mechanism to gather all the relevant stakeholders to address issues related to online IP infringement in a unified, mutually agreeable manner. The signatories of the MOU fall into four categories: Governmental authorities: DIP, Department of Business Development, and Department of International Trade Promotion; E-commerce platform operators: Lazada, Shopee, and JD Central (the most popular e-commerce platforms in Thailand); IP rights holders: Particularly including trademark owners facing ongoing counterfeiting problems in Thailand; and Law firms. Although the MOU is not
March 4, 2021
Vietnam has become a big player in the global fashion industry. Garments made in Vietnam now appear all over the world, especially in the U.S. and the EU. In this value chain, however, Vietnamese companies usually play the role of garment processors, fulfilling the orders of big brands for immediate export purposes. While the goods bearing the registered marks are made in Vietnam by local companies, the brand owners are often overseas or global corporations. As a brand owner can lose protection of its mark in Vietnam due to non-use, this situation leads to the question of what constitutes “use” of a mark when the mark-bearing goods are processed for export only, and not sold in the Vietnam market. Article 124.5 of Vietnam’s IP Law provides that: Use of a mark means the performance of the following acts: Affixing the protected mark on goods, packaging, business facilities, means of service provision, or transaction documents in business activities; Circulating, offering, advertising, or stocking for sale goods bearing the protected mark; Importing goods or services bearing the protected mark. At first glance, the above provision seems quite clear. While importing goods appears on the list, exporting goods is conspicuously absent, and therefore it is not an act of use. However, it is also clear that for the purpose of exporting, a product should go through a manufacturing or processing stage in which the mark will be physically affixed to the product or its packaging. For fashion goods, this could be in the form of a removable tag or package, a tag sewn onto the item, or a fundamental part of the garment’s design (such as a T-shirt emblazoned with a brand name, or a shoe featuring a distinctive logo). Then, the question becomes whether this act of affixing the mark on
March 4, 2021
Myanmar, which is now more than halfway through the scheduled soft opening of its Intellectual Property Department (IPD) under the country’s New Trademark Law, is well on its way to the full realization of its plans for a modernized IP system operating on par with international standards. As the first of four IP-related laws passed in 2019, the ongoing implementation of the Trademark Law affects definitions of trademarks and types of trademark applications. Section 2 of the law defines a “mark” as “either a visible sign or a combination of signs, including one’s own names, alphabet letters, numbers, graphical representations, or compositions of color and tints to distinguish the goods or services of an enterprise from those of another enterprise. Within this scope, trademark, service mark, collective mark and certification mark are also included. The ‘series mark’ consists of a number of these marks, which resemble each other on the material particulars, but may differ in some aspect—for instance, a mark with different color variations. However, there is no specific definition of what makes up a series mark in the Trademark Law itself, and there has also not yet been any clear guidance on the issue. The Trademark Rules, which set the guidelines for the trademark application and registration procedures, are still in the process of being finalized, are expected to include information on the possibility of filing series marks under the soft opening period. On December 29 2020, the IPD held a workshop to clarify various issues, and informed attendees that applications containing more than one trademark in a single application are prohibited under the new system. However, this seemed to contradict the Ministry of Commerce’s Order No. 63/2020, which had declared that the refiling of old marks under the soft opening period of the new Trademark Law
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension