You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 5, 2023

Changes Coming Soon for Vietnam’s Consumer Protection Law

Vietnam’s Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights (“Consumer Protection Law” or “CPL”) was passed in 2010 and has been effective since July 1, 2011, providing a legal framework for protecting the rights of consumers in Vietnam. Over the past 12 years of implementation and application, however, the CPL has revealed its shortcomings and limitations. For example, there are issues related to inconsistency between the CPL and other laws such as the Civil Code, Law on Competition, Enterprise Law, and Cybersecurity Law. The current CPL also has not kept pace with modern consumption practices, especially the rapid changes and emerging trends in e-commerce, cross-border transactions, and services via digital platforms. The government of Vietnam has therefore entrusted the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) to take the lead in drafting a new amended CPL to replace the old one, to improve the policies and legislation on consumer protection, and protect the vulnerabilities of consumers in transactions with businesses.

During the 5th session of the National Assembly at the end of May 2023, the National Assembly discussed and reviewed the latest draft of the CPL (“Draft CPL”), which is expected to be approved on June 21, 2023. The following are some key contents of the Draft CPL:

1. Revised Subjects of Application

Unlike the current CPL, which applies only to consumers; traders of goods and services; and agencies, organizations and individuals involved in consumer protection activities within the territory of Vietnam, the Draft CPL adds “the Vietnamese Fatherland Front, socio-political organizations and social organizations participating in protecting consumers’ interests” as new subjects of its application, and clarifies that “agencies, organizations, and individuals” include both domestic and offshore agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in activities of consumer rights protection. The Draft CPL also removes “within the territory of Vietnam” from the definition of the subjects of its application in order to expand the application to foreign organizations and companies which were established under foreign law. In other words, such foreign entities might be subject to the Draft CPL and must bear responsibility to consumers.

The Draft CPL revises the definition of “consumer” as “a person who buys and uses products, goods, and services for consumption and daily living purposes of individuals, families, or organizations, and not for commercial purposes” (underlined part added). However, it does not specify whether these “consumers” are Vietnamese and foreign consumers who are living in Vietnam; whether they can be Vietnamese citizens who are living overseas; or whether they can be foreign citizens who are buying from Vietnamese entities. The government may need to give further details to clarify the scope of application of “consumer” to avoid any confusion regarding the application of the CPL in practice.

Further, though this definition explicitly includes “not for commercial purposes,” the Draft CPL does not provide any explanation of what constitutes “commercial purposes.” Therefore, we might need to refer to the definition of “commercial activities” under the Commercial Law to interpret “commercial purposes.” Understanding “commercial purposes” is very important to verify whether activities will be subject to the CPL or other laws (e.g., the Commercial Law).

2. New Regulations on Product Recall

Under the Draft CPL, when a trader discovers that its goods are defective, it must carry out a recall.

The Draft CPL defines defective goods as “goods that fail to ensure the safety of consumers and which could cause damage to their lives, health, or property but for which the defect was undiscoverable at the time the goods were supplied to consumers even though such goods were manufactured correctly in accordance with current technical standards or criteria, including:

  1. Mass-produced goods in which a defect arises from a technical design;
  2. Singly produced goods in which a defect arises out of the process of manufacturing, processing, transportation, storage, and use;
  3. Goods with the potential to cause a loss of safety during use but which fail to have adequate instructions or warnings for consumers.

While this definition is largely the same as the one found in the current CPL, the Draft CPL further divides these “defective goods” into three groups:

  • Defective goods capable of causing damage to the health and life of consumers (Group A);
  • Defective goods capable of causing damage to consumers’ property (Group B); and
  • Defective goods capable of causing damage to the health, life and property of consumers, for which the regulations applicable to Group A will apply.

In general, the Draft CPL imposes different responsibilities on traders for each of these groups; thus, it is critical that the traders correctly identify the group of defective goods.

Another key note is that upon discovering the goods are defective, the trader must notify the relevant authorities of the defective goods and the recall, both before and after the recall. This is a bright spot of the Draft CPL in comparison to the old CPL and the current practice of handling recall notices of consumer protection agencies, as it is clearer about the responsibility of traders when discovering defective products and the time to report on the recall to the authority.

The Draft CPL also sets out that if more than one business entity causes damage to the consumer at the same time, such business entities must jointly compensate the consumer.

3. Protection of Consumer Information

In compliance with recent Vietnamese regulations on personal data protection, the Draft CPL sets out new provisions on the protection of consumer information, with some key points as below:

  • The Draft CPL introduces a new definition of “consumer information,” which includes consumers’ personal information, information about their process of purchasing and using products, goods and services, and other information related to transactions between consumers and traders.
  • The collection, storage, use, modification, updating, or destruction of consumer information must ensure the safety and security of consumer information.
  • Traders collecting, storing, or using consumer information must build and apply consumer information protection rules that cover the following contents: (i) purpose of information collection; (ii) scope of information use; (iii) information storage period; and (iv) measures to protect information and ensure consumer information safety. These rules must be publicly announced in a conspicuous place at the head office and business locations, and on any websites and apps for consumers to easily review prior to or at the time of information collection.
  • Before storing or using consumer information, traders must inform consumers clearly, publicly, and in a suitable method about the purpose and scope of information collection and use, as well as the storage period of the information, and must obtain consent from the consumer, except for the case of collecting information that has been made public by consumers or in other cases as prescribed by law.
  • Traders are required to establish a mechanism to duly obtain affirmative opt-in consent from consumers for certain activities such as sharing their information to third parties or for marketing purposes.
  • Traders must destroy consumer information when the storage period expires.
  • The Draft CPL supplements regulations on the responsibility to notify authorities within 24 hours when there is an attack on an information system that causes a risk of information loss.

4. New Regulations on Vulnerable Consumers

To improve the effectiveness of rights protection for groups of consumers who are more disadvantaged than ordinary consumers, the Draft CPL has introduced the definition of “vulnerable consumers,” which are “consumers who at the time of purchase or use of products, goods or services are likely to be subject to many adverse impacts in terms of access to information, health, property, and dispute settlement, including:

a) The elderly according to the provisions of laws on the elderly;

b) Persons with disabilities as prescribed by the laws on disabled persons;

c) Children in accordance with the laws on children;

d) Ethnic minority people; people living in ethnic minority and mountainous areas, islands, areas with difficult socio-economic conditions, and areas with extremely difficult socio-economic conditions as prescribed by law;

dd) Women who are pregnant or nursing a child under 12 months old;

e) Persons suffering from serious diseases as prescribed by law;

g) Members of poor households as prescribed by law.

The Draft CPL provides regulations on the responsibilities of traders in protecting the interests of vulnerable consumers, with some examples as below:

  • Traders must give priority to receiving, processing and handling legal claims from vulnerable consumers, and not transfer consumer requests to a third party for settlement, unless such third party has related obligations.
  • Traders are not allowed to refuse to settle complaints or requests for dispute settlement of vulnerable consumers for reasons of differences in language, writing, customs, or practices.
  • Traders must avoid stigmatization, discrimination, and taking advantage of vulnerabilities to infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of vulnerable consumers.
  • Traders must build internal rules and procedures to handle complaints or requests for dispute settlement from vulnerable consumers.

5. Other notable provisions

In addition to the essential regulations listed above, businesses should also note some other new provisions.

The Draft CPL provides additional regulations on some specific transactions, such as regulations on transactions in cyberspace and additional regulations on direct sales (door-to-door sales; multi-level marketing, and selling at a location that is not a regular transaction location).

For handling disputes between consumers and traders, the Draft CPL supplements new regulations on:

  • Allowing the choice of direct or online dispute resolution methods in cases where it is required by law.
  • The responsibilities of relevant parties for providing information during the dispute settlement process.
  • The responsibility of state management agencies and social organizations participating in the protection of consumer rights for keeping information and documents provided confidential in accordance with the law.
  • The order and procedures for mediation to comply with the laws on commercial mediation.
  • Settling civil cases on the protection of consumer rights according to the summary procedures prescribed in the Civil Procedure Code when the provisions of Article 317.1 of the Civil Procedure Code are satisfied or when specific conditions are met.

The Draft CPL also provides the definition of “influential people” and their responsibilities when introducing goods and products to consumers.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 17, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has released for public comment a draft bill to amend the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the country’s foundational consumer protection legislation. The draft amendment aims to modernize the nearly five-decade-old framework to address the rapid growth of digital commerce, online advertising, influencer marketing, and new business models. The public consultation period is open until October 10, 2026. Expanded Definitions Covering Digital Commerce The draft significantly broadens several core definitions to capture modern commercial activities: “Consumer” is expanded to include natural persons and nonprofit juristic persons who purchase or receive services, including those solicited by businesses and end users who do not directly pay for the goods or services. “Business operator” now explicitly covers advertising business operators and hired advertising persons, such as influencers and content creators. “Advertising media” is expanded to include digital platforms, social media, and social media user accounts. “Label” now encompasses electronic labels—symbols, codes, or other electronic formats displaying product information. Influencer and Advertising Disclosure Requirements In addition to these expanded definitions, “hired advertising person for selling goods or services” is a new definition covering influencers, content creators, live streamers, affiliate marketers, and virtual online media operators who receive monetary compensation or other benefits for advertising goods or services. Hired advertising persons—including influencers and content creators—must disclose to consumers that content is advertising and reveal their relationship with the business owner. Disclosure is required when the business owner employs the advertiser, pays or provides other benefits for the advertisement, or provides free or discounted products or services. These requirements apply where consumers would not otherwise know that the business has a connection to the person presenting the content. Labeling Requirements for Importers The draft introduces a clearer labeling obligation for importers of label-controlled goods, who must
August 27, 2026
Franchising in Thailand has matured into a sizeable commercial sector, but the rules governing franchisor–franchisee relationships remain scattered across general legislation rather than consolidated in a dedicated franchise statute. In this environment, the decisions of the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) have emerged as valuable practical guidance. Thailand follows a civil-law system in which judicial and administrative decisions do not create binding precedent; however, past rulings are nonetheless influential. This article examines the most instructive recent TCCT decisions and distills the practical compliance considerations for franchisors and franchisees operating in Thailand. Postcontract Changes: Justified or Unfair? A recurring issue is whether a franchisor may alter the terms of engagement after contract execution. The TCCT has established that midterm modifications are not inherently unfair; the determinative factors are whether there was a reasonable business justification, adequate advance notice, and a transparent process. In a 2023 coffee franchise matter, for instance, the TCCT declined to find a violation where a franchisor increased raw material prices, noting the increase had been communicated in advance and supported by demonstrable cost pressures. A bubble tea franchise matter reinforces this principle. The TCCT found that postcontract mandatory purchases of branded syrup and flavorings were justified, as the agreement reserved the franchisor’s right to modify product requirements, the materials were sold at or below market prices, and the branded ingredients possessed distinctive qualities deemed essential to franchise quality. The complaint was dismissed, with the additional requirements characterized as a legitimate measure to preserve brand consistency. Considered together, these decisions indicate that post‑contract modifications will be evaluated against three criteria: (1) whether there is a legitimate business rationale, (2) whether adequate advance notice was provided, and (3) whether franchisees were treated equitably throughout the transition. Discriminatory Treatment: Are Renewals and Information Equal? A 2024 automotive dealership
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
August 13, 2026
On August 6, 2026, the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) issued a notice calling on business owners that issue electronic money, such as e-wallet accounts and stored-value membership cards, to notify the central bank within 90 days. The notice targets businesses that are not licensed banking or financial institutions or payment service providers, but have been issuing e-money to facilitate payments within their own networks. Failure to notify the NBC may result in legal action. Background and Regulatory Basis The NBC has observed that certain businesses, including cafes, restaurants, transportation companies, entertainment centers, and gas stations, have been issuing e-money through e-wallet accounts in mobile apps or membership cards to facilitate customer payments for products or services within their own networks. Customers create e-wallet accounts and load balances to pay for goods or services at the issuing business. The NBC describes this as “single-purpose e-money.” Under the 1999 Law on Banking and Financial Institutions, providing payment facilities to customers forms part of the operations of banking and financial institutions and requires an NBC license. In addition, article 20 of the 2017 Prakas on the Management of Payment Service Institutions further prohibits legal entities other than banking and financial institutions and payment service institutions from issuing e-money. However, article 20 also provides that issuing e-money in certain limited cases does not require a license, but the NBC must be notified in advance in writing. A business may issue single-purpose e-money without a payment service institution license provided it meets all the following conditions and submits written notice to the NBC: The maximum balance per account is KHR 200,000 (approximately USD 50) or equivalent. The total aggregate balance across all accounts does not exceed KHR 800 million (approximately USD 200,000) or equivalent. The e-money is used to pay for products or