You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 4, 2026

Carbon Credits in Thailand

Carbon markets have moved to the forefront of corporate and regulatory agendas as global attention to climate change and sustainability intensifies. Worldwide, many jurisdictions—including Thailand—are finding carbon markets to be promising tools in their efforts to combat climate-warming emissions and accelerate their net-zero pathways and sustainability commitments.

According to the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization’s (TGO) 2025 Voluntary Carbon Market Survey, approximately 3.29 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂eq) were traded under Thailand’s domestic standard between 2020 and 2024 with a cumulative market value of approximately THB 314.5 million (approximately USD 9.43 million), and 524 projects had been registered under the Thailand Voluntary Emission Reduction Program (T-VER) framework.

Carbon Credits in Thailand

Thailand’s carbon credit regime is, at present, entirely voluntary. There is not yet any obligation for businesses to purchase or retire carbon credits, although this may change once the draft Climate Change Act is enacted.

The draft Climate Change Act, which is currently undergoing legal review before submission to Parliament, is expected to introduce a mandatory emissions trading system (ETS), under which  legal entities in designated sectors will be allocated emissions allowances and will be required to surrender sufficient allowances to cover their verified emissions, with penalties for shortfalls. Rather than imposing a blanket obligation on all businesses to purchase or retire carbon credits, the draft act is expected to allow ETS-covered entities to use eligible carbon credits (for example, those certified under T-VER) to meet only a limited, capped portion of their compliance obligation, with the applicable cap and eligibility criteria to be set out in subordinate regulations and the relevant allocation plan.

The principal domestic framework for carbon credits is the T-VER, administered by the TGO. While some project developers in Thailand also operate under international standards such as Verified Carbon Standard or the Gold Standard, T-VER is the predominant domestic standard and accounts for the large majority of registered projects. Under T-VER, a carbon credit represents one tonne of greenhouse gas that has been reduced or sequestered by a registered project and recorded in the TGO’s official registry. Thailand currently operates two tiers of the program: Standard T-VER and Premium T-VER, with the latter designed to align with article 6 of the Paris Agreement and facilitate the international transfer of Thai-origin credits.

How Credits Are Issued

Generating carbon credits under T-VER involves two key stages: project registration and credit certification.

At the project registration stage, the project’s developer must demonstrate that its project is located in Thailand and that the anticipated emission reductions are genuine, go beyond what would have occurred under ordinary circumstances, and are not counted under any other program. An independent TGO-accredited assessor reviews the project, and the TGO’s board considers and approves it for registration.

At the credit certification stage, the developer reports on the emission reductions and sequestration actually achieved. An independent assessor verifies those results, and the TGO’s Board certifies the corresponding credits, which are then recorded in the TGO’s registry and become available for trading.

Trading of Credits

Once certified, carbon credits may be traded. Trading currently takes place either directly between parties on an over-the-counter (OTC) basis or through the TGO’s trading platform. So far, OTC transactions remain the primary channel and account for more than 56% of purchases. Buyers and sellers in the market are required to open accounts in the TGO’s carbon credit registry in order to hold and transfer credits.

The market infrastructure is developing quickly. Following cabinet approval in February 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a notification in March 2026 (effective April 1, 2026) reclassifying carbon credits as goods eligible to serve as underlying assets under the Derivatives Act, paving the way for futures contracts on carbon credits to be traded on the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX) with both physical delivery and cash settlement. Digital tokens backed by carbon credits are also emerging as an additional trading channel (more on this below). This reflects a broader policy ambition for Thailand to become a regional hub for carbon credit trading. The pending Climate Change Act is expected to add a compliance market alongside the existing voluntary market, which would significantly expand the scope of carbon credits regulation in Thailand and increase demand for credits.

Tokenization of Carbon Credits

Tokenization refers to the process of representing an asset, such as carbon credit, as a digital token recorded on a blockchain or other distributed ledger. In the carbon market context, this is generally achieved either through a “carbon bridge,” under which a credit already issued in a conventional registry (such as the T-VER registry, Verra, or Gold Standard) is locked or retired in that registry while a corresponding token is minted on-chain, or through native issuance, under which the registry issues the credit as an on-chain token from the outset. The legal character of the resulting token depends on the rights it confers on the holder. A token that simply represents an underlying credit for retirement or offsetting purposes, without offering a financial return, is generally treated as a form of utility token, whereas a token structured to give holders a financial return, such as a share of future carbon credit sales revenue, is more likely to be characterized as an investment token and brought within Thailand’s capital markets and securities regulatory perimeter. This distinction is central to how tokenized carbon credits intersect with capital market laws in Thailand.

A recent domestic example, governed by Thai law, illustrates this. In mid-2026, Token X (an SEC-licensed ICO portal under SCB group), with Siam TC Technology Co., Ltd. (STCT), a subsidiary of DITTO (Thailand), launched Blu Green Token (BLU), marketed as Thailand’s first digital token backed by carbon credits. BLU is an investment token in relation to mangrove reforestation credits, offering 400 million tokens at THB 1.20 each (up to THB 480 million, or approximately USD 14.7 million) over a seven-year term, with returns tied to future carbon credit sales revenue.

From a Thai regulatory perspective, digital tokens are primarily governed by the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses, which distinguishes “utility tokens” (conferring rights to specific goods, services, or entitlements) from “investment tokens” (conferring rights to participate in an investment in a project or business). Investment tokens are subject to a regime broadly analogous to a securities offering, requiring SEC approval, a registration statement and prospectus, and distribution through an SEC-licensed ICO portal.

Selling Credits Internationally

Thai carbon credits can be sold to foreign buyers, with the mechanism for doing so depending on the buyer’s intended use. For private-sector buyers who simply wish to use the credits for voluntary offsetting, the seller may cancel the credits in the TGO’s registry and provide the buyer with a cancellation certificate, or the buyer may open an account in the TGO’s registry to hold the credits directly. Neither route requires special authorization from the TGO, provided the buyer’s country accepts Thai-standard credits.

A separate and more regulated process applies where credits are to be used for “international purposes”—that is, where they will count toward another country’s emissions reduction target under the Paris Agreement or other international agreements. In August 2025, Thailand’s cabinet approved a guideline establishing the framework for such transfers, which requires authorization from the director-general of the Department of Climate Change and Environment (DCCE) and corresponding adjustments to avoid double counting.

Tax Incentives

To encourage participation in the carbon credit market, income derived from the sale of T-VER carbon credits may qualify for a corporate income tax exemption for a specified number of accounting periods, subject to conditions prescribed under the Revenue Code and its subordinate legislation.

Considerations for Foreign Participants under the Foreign Business Act

Foreign entities should be aware that the Foreign Business Act may apply to their involvement in the carbon credit market. Depending on the underlying activities, some projects (particularly those involving forestry or agriculture) may fall within business categories restricted to foreigners, and the sale of carbon credits by a foreign entity can itself be treated as a restricted service business requiring a Foreign Business License or other applicable exemptions.

Looking Ahead

Thailand’s voluntary carbon credit market framework is well established, but the compliance side remains in flux pending enactment of the Climate Change Act, and the rules that bear on any given project are spread across several regimes—the T-VER framework, capital markets regulation where credits are tokenized, the Foreign Business Act, and the Revenue Code. Businesses considering carbon credit projects, investments, or transactions in Thailand should check the current status with local specialists before committing to a structure, as the requirements applicable to a project may shift as the legislation advances.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
February 17, 2021
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has amended foreign exchange (FX) controls, as part of its roadmap toward a “new Thai FX ecosystem,” to further relax limitations and restrictions on outbound investments remitted by investors in Thailand. This latest move follows a prior relaxation of foreign trading and exchange regulations in November 2019. The new developments primarily relate to the thresholds for outbound investment, types of foreign investment products that investors may participate in, and foreign currency deposit accounts. These are detailed below.   Outbound Investment Thresholds The new measures ease the individual and group limits for outbound investment as shown in the table below.   Types of Investment Products The previous FX measures allowed investors to process FX transactions for investment in various types of inbound and outbound products; however, inbound products were limited to only debt instruments (e.g., bonds and structured notes) issued in foreign currency. The new FX measures expand the scope of products to include all types of investment products that reference foreign variables, such as foreign stocks, exchange traded funds, commodities, gold futures, and foreign indexes. FX derivatives and other investment products (e.g., endowment life insurance, unit-linked life policies, and universal life insurance) are still open to outbound investment.   Foreign Currency Deposit (FCD) Accounts The BOT also amended the requirements pertaining to foreign currency deposit (FCD) accounts. Previously, an FCD account for investment (i.e., portfolio foreign currency deposit) had to be separated from investors’ other FCD accounts. Separation of FCD accounts is no longer required, and a single FCD account can now be used for any transaction permitted by the BOT.
February 3, 2021
On January 20, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC) and the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on mutual recognition of funds. The MOU aims to facilitate the process for eligible funds set up in one country to be marketed and offered to investors in the other country by streamlining qualifications and processes for registration with the regulators. The key elements of the MOU are outlined below. Covered Funds The MOU generally only covers funds in the form of collective investment schemes (CIS), set up in Thailand or Hong Kong and managed by a covered management company that is authorized or licensed in its home country, (i.e., Thailand or Hong Kong) that is seeking approval to offer these funds to the public in the other country (the “host country”). Apart from the regulatory requirements prescribed by the regulator of the home country, the covered funds must also meet certain eligibility requirements, dependent on the type of fund offering, set by the regulator of the inbound jurisdiction (i.e. the SEC or the SFC). These funds must fall within one or more fund types specified in the MOU, including general equity funds, bond funds, mixed funds, feeder funds, unlisted index funds, and exchange-traded funds. Note that the SEC has agreed to expedite approval for Thai feeder funds that invest in Hong Kong master funds by streamlining certain processes. Covered Management Companies Generally, an asset management company that is authorized in its home jurisdiction (i.e., Thailand or Hong Kong) will be able to conduct cross-border marketing and fund offering activities under this MOU. Requirements for Fund Offerings Apart from meeting certain qualifications prescribed by the host country, fund offerings must be conducted in accordance with the host country’s requirements. In