You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 4, 2026

Carbon Credits in Thailand

Subscribe to Updates

Carbon markets have moved to the forefront of corporate and regulatory agendas as global attention to climate change and sustainability intensifies. Worldwide, many jurisdictions—including Thailand—are finding carbon markets to be promising tools in their efforts to combat climate-warming emissions and accelerate their net-zero pathways and sustainability commitments.

According to the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization’s (TGO) 2025 Voluntary Carbon Market Survey, approximately 3.29 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂eq) were traded under Thailand’s domestic standard between 2020 and 2024 with a cumulative market value of approximately THB 314.5 million (approximately USD 9.43 million), and 524 projects had been registered under the Thailand Voluntary Emission Reduction Program (T-VER) framework.

Carbon Credits in Thailand

Thailand’s carbon credit regime is, at present, entirely voluntary. There is not yet any obligation for businesses to purchase or retire carbon credits, although this may change once the draft Climate Change Act is enacted.

The draft Climate Change Act, which is currently undergoing legal review before submission to Parliament, is expected to introduce a mandatory emissions trading system (ETS), under which  legal entities in designated sectors will be allocated emissions allowances and will be required to surrender sufficient allowances to cover their verified emissions, with penalties for shortfalls. Rather than imposing a blanket obligation on all businesses to purchase or retire carbon credits, the draft act is expected to allow ETS-covered entities to use eligible carbon credits (for example, those certified under T-VER) to meet only a limited, capped portion of their compliance obligation, with the applicable cap and eligibility criteria to be set out in subordinate regulations and the relevant allocation plan.

The principal domestic framework for carbon credits is the T-VER, administered by the TGO. While some project developers in Thailand also operate under international standards such as Verified Carbon Standard or the Gold Standard, T-VER is the predominant domestic standard and accounts for the large majority of registered projects. Under T-VER, a carbon credit represents one tonne of greenhouse gas that has been reduced or sequestered by a registered project and recorded in the TGO’s official registry. Thailand currently operates two tiers of the program: Standard T-VER and Premium T-VER, with the latter designed to align with article 6 of the Paris Agreement and facilitate the international transfer of Thai-origin credits.

How Credits Are Issued

Generating carbon credits under T-VER involves two key stages: project registration and credit certification.

At the project registration stage, the project’s developer must demonstrate that its project is located in Thailand and that the anticipated emission reductions are genuine, go beyond what would have occurred under ordinary circumstances, and are not counted under any other program. An independent TGO-accredited assessor reviews the project, and the TGO’s board considers and approves it for registration.

At the credit certification stage, the developer reports on the emission reductions and sequestration actually achieved. An independent assessor verifies those results, and the TGO’s Board certifies the corresponding credits, which are then recorded in the TGO’s registry and become available for trading.

Trading of Credits

Once certified, carbon credits may be traded. Trading currently takes place either directly between parties on an over-the-counter (OTC) basis or through the TGO’s trading platform. So far, OTC transactions remain the primary channel and account for more than 56% of purchases. Buyers and sellers in the market are required to open accounts in the TGO’s carbon credit registry in order to hold and transfer credits.

The market infrastructure is developing quickly. Following cabinet approval in February 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a notification in March 2026 (effective April 1, 2026) reclassifying carbon credits as goods eligible to serve as underlying assets under the Derivatives Act, paving the way for futures contracts on carbon credits to be traded on the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX) with both physical delivery and cash settlement. Digital tokens backed by carbon credits are also emerging as an additional trading channel (more on this below). This reflects a broader policy ambition for Thailand to become a regional hub for carbon credit trading. The pending Climate Change Act is expected to add a compliance market alongside the existing voluntary market, which would significantly expand the scope of carbon credits regulation in Thailand and increase demand for credits.

Tokenization of Carbon Credits

Tokenization refers to the process of representing an asset, such as carbon credit, as a digital token recorded on a blockchain or other distributed ledger. In the carbon market context, this is generally achieved either through a “carbon bridge,” under which a credit already issued in a conventional registry (such as the T-VER registry, Verra, or Gold Standard) is locked or retired in that registry while a corresponding token is minted on-chain, or through native issuance, under which the registry issues the credit as an on-chain token from the outset. The legal character of the resulting token depends on the rights it confers on the holder. A token that simply represents an underlying credit for retirement or offsetting purposes, without offering a financial return, is generally treated as a form of utility token, whereas a token structured to give holders a financial return, such as a share of future carbon credit sales revenue, is more likely to be characterized as an investment token and brought within Thailand’s capital markets and securities regulatory perimeter. This distinction is central to how tokenized carbon credits intersect with capital market laws in Thailand.

A recent domestic example, governed by Thai law, illustrates this. In mid-2026, Token X (an SEC-licensed ICO portal under SCB group), with Siam TC Technology Co., Ltd. (STCT), a subsidiary of DITTO (Thailand), launched Blu Green Token (BLU), marketed as Thailand’s first digital token backed by carbon credits. BLU is an investment token in relation to mangrove reforestation credits, offering 400 million tokens at THB 1.20 each (up to THB 480 million, or approximately USD 14.7 million) over a seven-year term, with returns tied to future carbon credit sales revenue.

From a Thai regulatory perspective, digital tokens are primarily governed by the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses, which distinguishes “utility tokens” (conferring rights to specific goods, services, or entitlements) from “investment tokens” (conferring rights to participate in an investment in a project or business). Investment tokens are subject to a regime broadly analogous to a securities offering, requiring SEC approval, a registration statement and prospectus, and distribution through an SEC-licensed ICO portal.

Selling Credits Internationally

Thai carbon credits can be sold to foreign buyers, with the mechanism for doing so depending on the buyer’s intended use. For private-sector buyers who simply wish to use the credits for voluntary offsetting, the seller may cancel the credits in the TGO’s registry and provide the buyer with a cancellation certificate, or the buyer may open an account in the TGO’s registry to hold the credits directly. Neither route requires special authorization from the TGO, provided the buyer’s country accepts Thai-standard credits.

A separate and more regulated process applies where credits are to be used for “international purposes”—that is, where they will count toward another country’s emissions reduction target under the Paris Agreement or other international agreements. In August 2025, Thailand’s cabinet approved a guideline establishing the framework for such transfers, which requires authorization from the director-general of the Department of Climate Change and Environment (DCCE) and corresponding adjustments to avoid double counting.

Tax Incentives

To encourage participation in the carbon credit market, income derived from the sale of T-VER carbon credits may qualify for a corporate income tax exemption for a specified number of accounting periods, subject to conditions prescribed under the Revenue Code and its subordinate legislation.

Considerations for Foreign Participants under the Foreign Business Act

Foreign entities should be aware that the Foreign Business Act may apply to their involvement in the carbon credit market. Depending on the underlying activities, some projects (particularly those involving forestry or agriculture) may fall within business categories restricted to foreigners, and the sale of carbon credits by a foreign entity can itself be treated as a restricted service business requiring a Foreign Business License or other applicable exemptions.

Looking Ahead

Thailand’s voluntary carbon credit market framework is well established, but the compliance side remains in flux pending enactment of the Climate Change Act, and the rules that bear on any given project are spread across several regimes—the T-VER framework, capital markets regulation where credits are tokenized, the Foreign Business Act, and the Revenue Code. Businesses considering carbon credit projects, investments, or transactions in Thailand should check the current status with local specialists before committing to a structure, as the requirements applicable to a project may shift as the legislation advances.

Related Professionals

Practices

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 10, 2026
Following Thailand’s recent expansion of the “major shareholder” definition for securities and digital asset businesses, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a public hearing on April 7, 2026, on expanding the major shareholder definition further to cover funding sources behind share acquisitions in licensed securities and digital asset business operators. The public hearing will remain open for 15 days from the launch date, after which the proposed expansion is expected to take effect promptly so that operators can comply with both the earlier and additional requirements within the 180-day transitional period under the earlier regulations. Funding Sources Captured Under Control-Based Test Under the draft rules, persons who fund direct or indirect major shareholders’ acquisition of shares in a licensed operator would be deemed “controlling persons” and subject to SEC approval as major shareholders. This extends beyond traditional lenders to include guarantors, counterparties to derivatives or structured products, and any arrangement that results in a person being, directly or indirectly, a source of funding to a major shareholder. The SEC proposes to exempt three categories of funding arrangements from approval: Loans from Thai licensed financial institutions or BCBS (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision)-jurisdiction foreign banks; Margin loans for securities trading under Thai securities law; and Repurchase agreements under Thai securities law. Exemptions for Funding Sources of Government-Linked Entities The consultation proposes to stop look-through beyond the level of certain government-linked shareholders, including, without limitation, ministries, departments, bureaus, public organizations, independent agencies, and certain state enterprises. The SEC reasons that these entities’ mandates, duties, and funding sources are already subject to government oversight and audit, presenting minimal ownership-structure risk. Practical Implications Licensed securities and digital asset business operators should begin mapping their funding chains under the expanded definition in preparation for filing approval applications for any newly captured funding providers
Read More
April 3, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established a comprehensive governance framework for the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) in the capital markets. The framework provides guidance to capital market business operators on understanding the risks associated with AI/ML implementation and adopting appropriate practices to build public confidence in Thailand’s capital markets. While the guidelines are principle-based rather than prescriptive, they reflect the SEC’s expectations for responsible AI/ML governance and are likely to inform supervisory activities and industry standards going forward. Scope The framework applies to capital market business operators supervised by the SEC. This includes, for example, securities and derivatives firms, asset management companies, mutual fund and private fund managers, investment advisors and investment consultants (including robo-advisory service providers), derivatives intermediaries, and other licensed intermediaries and market operators in the Thai capital markets that deploy AI/ML in their operations. Core Principles of the Guidelines The framework is presented as a best-practice manual rather than prescriptive regulation, providing guidance that regulated entities may apply to their AI/ML governance and risk management as appropriate. While currently nonbinding, the guidelines signal the SEC’s expectations for the sector, particularly in relation to other binding SEC regulations such as those covering IT risk management and market conduct. The guidelines name four core principles for AI/ML deployment: Fairness: Design and develop AI/ML with consideration for fairness, equality, and social diversity to prevent discrimination against individuals or groups. Legal and ethical compliance: Ensure AI/ML use aligns with applicable laws, ethical standards, and organizational values and policies. Accountability: Establish clear responsibility—both internally and externally—for AI/ML activities and outcomes. Transparency: Provide adequate disclosure to users about AI/ML use, including explainability of decisions and traceability of activities. AI/ML Best Practices The guidelines prescribe best practices across four stages of the AI/ML lifecycle, as described below.
Read More
March 16, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has broadened the definition of institutional investors, expanded the types of qualifying investments, and updated financial qualification thresholds for various investor categories through a revised notification on the definitions of institutional investors, ultra-high net worth investors, and high net worth investors. The amended framework, which came into force on March 1, 2026, adds digital asset business operators, investment planners, and investment consultants to the roster of entities recognized as institutional investors, and broadens the definition of investment to account for digital tokens. Expanded Definition of Institutional Investors Under the SEC’s revised notification, the category of institutional investors now expressly includes digital asset business operators licensed under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). This addition recognizes the growing role of digital asset platforms and service providers in Thailand’s investment ecosystem and aligns the regulatory treatment of digital markets with that of traditional markets. The definition of institutional investors now also encompasses investment planners and investment consultants approved by the SEC. Previously, only SEC-approved investment analysts held this status; the expansion covers a broader scope of professionals who possess comparable expertise and experience in evaluating investment opportunities. Broadened Investment Definition The revised framework now defines investment to mean direct or indirect investment in a wider range of assets beyond deposits. Specifically, the definition covers: Securities under the Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives under the Derivatives Act Investment tokens offered to the public Government-issued digital tokens (G-tokens) as specified in a separate SEC notification This expansion ensures that financial status assessments reflect the full spectrum of an investor’s holdings, including emerging digital assets. Updated Financial Qualification Thresholds The amended SEC notification also provides updated qualification thresholds for angel investors, ultra-high net worth investors, and high net worth investors. While the core criteria
Read More
March 10, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have issued regulations broadening the criteria for determining who qualifies as a “major shareholder” of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Under relevant SEC regulations, major shareholders of a regulated entity must obtain regulatory approval and undergo screening by the SEC. The revised framework introduces both shareholding-based and control-based tests to determine which shareholders require regulatory approval for a wider range of indirect ownership structures and de facto control. The Ministry of Finance notification took effect on February 21, 2026, while the SEC’s clarifying rules took effect on March 4, 2026. These changes aim to enhance transparency around beneficial ownership and strengthen regulatory oversight of entities operating in Thailand’s capital markets. Expanded Definition Under the revised framework, a “major shareholder” now includes persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 10% of the voting rights in a regulated company, as well as persons who exercise control over the regulated company or its shares. This system of two separate tests, based on both shareholding and control, differs from the prior regime, which focused primarily on shareholding thresholds and applied a more limited method for determining indirect shareholdings. The two tests (detailed below) operate independently of each other, and any person identified by either of the tests will be deemed a major shareholder. Shareholding-Based Test Broadens Indirect Ownership Attribution For the shareholding-based test, the SEC recognizes two existing methods for identifying indirect ownership, together with a new proportional attribution method. Any person captured under these methods, which are described below, will be regarded as a major shareholder of the regulated company and must obtain SEC approval as a major shareholder. First, the existing framework continues to apply to both first-tier and chain ownership structures. Approval is required for (1) first-tier
Read More