You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 9, 2015

Capturing Opportunity: Myanmar’s Hotel and Tourism Boom

Informed Counsel

Since Myanmar liberalized its economy in 2011, the country has experienced a surge of foreign direct investment and visiting tourists. Official government figures show that tourist arrivals have risen from below 1 million in 2011 to over 3 million in 2014, with the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism setting an ambitious target of 4.5 to 5 million tourist arrivals in 2015.

Recognizing the need for international standard hotel facilities, funded by overseas investors, Myanmar’s government has worked to increase foreign investment by implementing laws and policies to encourage foreign market growth. This includes passage of the Foreign Investment Law 2012 and implementing regulations allowing for 100 percent foreign ownership of hotel projects rated three stars and above. In addition, the Asian Development Bank has unveiled plans to further promote regional investment in the hotel and tourism sector, and Myanmar has committed to launching a Tourism Development Bank to provide financial and technical assistance to entrepreneurs.

The response from investors has been positive—the number of hotel facility constructions has steadily increased since 2011. This has included numerous internationally-recognized hoteliers such as Accor, Hilton, Best Western, Shangri La, and Dusit International. Indeed, statistics from the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism show that the total number of registered hotels was 787 in 2012 and 923 in 2013, a dramatic increase that is expected to carry over into 2014. Yet, despite robust development, Myanmar’s hotel and tourism infrastructure has strained to keep up with the lightning pace of demand, highlighting the need for continued sector investment.

An important consideration in the development of Myanmar’s hotel industry is the country’s land laws. Since foreigners cannot own land in Myanmar, proper due diligence is a necessary first step to ensure that long-term land leases are viable under the Foreign Investment Law. There is no absolute freedom to lease—instead, all long-term leases are subject to the review and approval of the Myanmar Investment Commission, the primary authority responsible for the review of foreign investment applications under the Foreign Investment Law. This review process includes the vetting of all long-term lease agreements for hotel investment operations, along with an overall review of the investment application itself. If approved, the lease may be approved for an initial period of 50 years, renewable for two consecutive periods of 10 years each.

In addition to the Myanmar Investment Commission’s investment application review, both foreign and domestic hotel investment projects are vetted by the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism. Once a project has received the Ministry’s formal approval, the Directorate of Hotels and Tourism will grant a two-year renewable license for the hotel business. Although foreign investors may structure their investment under either the Myanmar Companies Act or the Foreign Investment Law, projects are almost always filed and approved under the Foreign Investment Law, which provides for a number of benefits that are currently not available under the Myanmar Companies Act, the most important being tax exemption qualifications and the ability to engage in long-term lease agreements.

For hotels, the Ministry has introduced a star rating system. This is an important review process, since 100 percent foreign investment is only permitted for projects approved at three stars and above. For investment in hotels rated below three stars, a joint venture with a Myanmar entity is the only viable business structure. Regardless of the classification contemplated, it is important that complete and adequate supporting materials are provided to the Ministry for the classification evaluation. It is also typical for the applicant’s counsel to consult with the Ministry to clarify applications under review. This can significantly reduce the time for rating qualifications and hotel license issuance. Once the Ministry has given its approval, the final review and investment permit decision is made by the Myanmar Investment Commission.

Myanmar is unique in the region in that it retains a colonial history in its architecture, something long ago lost to some of its regional neighbors. With hundreds of colonial properties in Yangon in need of restoration, opportunities exist for the right investors to collaborate on projects for hotel, restaurant, and retail service projects. The success of such projects can already be seen in a number of existing projects, such as the Strand Hotel and the Belmond Governor’s Residence, two of Yangon’s most prominent five-star hotel properties. Other projects are ongoing or contemplated, such as the long-anticipated restoration of the Secretariat Building, as well as the Yangon Railway Office Redevelopment Project, which will be downtown Yangon’s largest commercial project.

Although Myanmar is ripe for opportunity, development of the country’s hotel and tourism infrastructure will need to keep up with the pace of demand if its investors are to reap the benefits of long-term sustainability and success. Investors must also be wary of pitfalls that require measured guidance and evaluation, even in the midst of a market boom.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the
February 25, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has updated the Vietnam chapter in the newly released Licensing 2026 guide, published by Lexology Panoramic. The comparative guide provides companies and other interested readers with information on licensing law and practice in various countries around the world. Licensing 2026 provides detailed information on the following topics: Restrictions, laws and licensing arrangements Intellectual property issues: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, contesting the validity of licensor’s IP rights, invalidity and expiry of IP rights, security interests, proceedings against third parties, sublicensing, jointly owned IP, first to file, scope of patent protection, trade secrets, copyright Software licensing: Perpetual licensing, legal requirements, user restrictions Royalties and payments, currency conversion, and taxes: Relevant legislation, restrictions, taxation of foreign licensors Competition law issues: Restrictions on trade, legal restrictions, and IP-related court rulings Indemnification, disclaimers, and damages: Prevalence and enforceability of indemnity provisions and contractual waivers of damages Termination: Right to terminate, impact of termination Bankruptcy: Impact of licensee or licensor bankruptcy Dispute resolution: Governing law, arbitration, enforceability, injunctive relief, contractual waivers The Vietnam chapter is available below as a PDF. Readers can gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Licensing 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which