You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 20, 2018

Cambodia’s Recently Launched Corporate Bond Market

Informed Counsel

In 2007, Cambodia enacted the Law on the Issuance and Trading of Non-Governmental Securities (“2007 Securities Law”), which paved the way for corporations to issue both debt and equity securities to the public and contributed to steady progress in the Cambodian equity market, with the country’s first initial public offering in 2012 and a total of three state-owned enterprises and two corporations currently listed on the Cambodia Securities Exchange (CSX), the sole securities market operator in Cambodia.

The debt market, however, has been inactive, partly due to the absence of additional subordinating regulations to enforce the 2007 Securities Law. Without a robust securities market, Cambodian businesses had to resort to the more costly conventional financing options offered by commercial banks.

In the past few months, the corporate bond market’s regulatory landscape has quickly developed, with the Securities Exchange Commission of Cambodia (SECC), the governmental agency tasked with regulating the securities sector, issued a series of Prakas (ministerial regulations), including:

  • Prakas 009 on Public Offering of Debt Securities, dated August 17, 2017
  • Prakas 010 on Accreditation of Bondholder Representatives, dated August 17, 2017
  • Prakas 011 on Accreditation of Credit Ratings Agencies, dated August 17, 2017
  • Prakas 016 on Implementation of Listing Rules for Debt Securities of CSX, dated December 26, 2017
  • Prakas 017 on Implementation of Market Operating Rule of CSX, dated December 26, 2017

Cambodia is pushing its corporate bond market ahead of its sovereign bond market. These regulations enable corporations to publicly offer debt securities and subject them to the SECC’s tight regulatory oversight.

Defining “Public Offering” and “Debt Securities”

A “public offering” of debt securities is defined by Prakas 009 as any offering of debt securities that is not considered as a “private placement,” which refers to an offering of debt securities that is made in less than 12 months to no more than 30 people and is not publicly announced in any form or by any means.

The 2007 Securities Law defines “debt securities” broadly to include any instrument that evidences the money deposited with or owed by the person issuing the instrument. However, as the Cambodian corporate bond market is in the early stages, Prakas 009 only introduces three fairly simple debt securities, as follows:

  • Plain bond. A bond that has a fixed coupon rate and a specified maturity date. A plain bond does not have enhancements, additional calls, or put options and is not secured or guaranteed.
  • Secured bond. A bond that is secured with an asset, excluding asset-backed securities.
  • Guaranteed bond. A bond with interest and principal payments guaranteed by a third party.

Other types of debt securities, such as a convertible bond, can only be issued to the public with prior approval from the SECC, or if permitted by a separate regulation.

Requirements for Public Offering of Debt Securities

Under Prakas 009, a company wishing to make a private placement of debt securities must file related documents to the SECC both prior to and upon completion of the debt securities offering.

On the other hand, a company wishing to make a public offering of debt securities must be registered as a public limited company with the Ministry of Commerce and comply with various corporate governance, disclosure, minimum capital, and other requirements set by the SECC in Prakas 009 and by the CSX in Prakas 016.

Under Prakas 016, the company must have a minimum equity of KHR 2 billion (approx. USD 500,000), except in the case of the issuance of secured bonds. The total amount of debt-securities to be issued must be at least KHR 1 billion (approx. USD 250,000), or at least KHR 500 million (approx. USD 125,000) for secured bonds. The company would also need to hire an underwriter and a range of advisors.

In September 2017, the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) adopted Prakas B7-017-300 on Conditions for Banking and Financial Institutions to be Listed on the Cambodian Securities Exchange. The Prakas sets additional requirements for banks and financial institutions that intend to issue securities to the public, including requiring prior approval from the NBC and minimum equity of KHR 60 billion (approx. USD 15 million), and prohibiting the issuing of equity securities equal to more than 20 percent of their voting shares or debt securities worth more than 20 percent of their total assets.

Accreditation of Bondholder Representatives and Credit Rating Agencies

Prakas 010 and Prakas 011 set accreditation procedures for bondholder representatives and credit ratings agencies, and impose requirements and obligations on them. These two Prakas complement Prakas 009, which requires companies intending to make public offerings of debt securities to obtain a credit rating from an accredited credit rating agency and to appoint a bondholder representative to obtain SECC approval.

Under Prakas 010, only commercial banks, securities firms, securities registrars, securities transfer agents and paying agents, and custodian banks are permitted to apply for accreditation from the SECC to become a bondholder representative.

Under Prakas 011, any local company can apply to become a credit ratings agency, provided it meets the minimum capital, corporate governance, and other requirements. The SECC will issue and publish a list of international credit rating agencies that are qualified to provide credit rating services in the Cambodian securities sector.

Prakas 009 also includes transitional provisions that provide alternative solutions to avoid a regulatory deadlock in the event that there are no accredited bondholder representatives and/or credit rating agencies.

The spate of new banking regulations in 2017 are a promising sign for Cambodia’s nascent banking industry, laying the groundwork for a robust corporate bond market, which is the latest in a series of measures aimed at driving the country’s fast-paced economic development.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 25, 2025
On June 17, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law No. 76/2025/QH15 (Amended LOE) amending and supplementing the 2020 Law on Enterprises, which aims to reshape the legal framework to enhance transparency and alignment with international standards. The Amended LOE took effect from July 1, 2025. Below are key notes on the Amended LOE. Recognition of Beneficial Owners The beneficial owner (BO) concept was previously addressed under Vietnam’s anti-money laundering framework. However, the formal recognition of a BO in the Amended LOE marks a pivotal advancement in embedding ownership transparency into corporate governance, in line with the G7 Financial Action Task Force’s standards on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing. Under the Amended LOE and Decree No. 168/2025/ND-CP of the government dated June 30, 2025, on enterprise registration (Decree 168), a BO is identified through either equity ownership or control rights. Equity ownership: Individuals holding 25% or more of a company’s charter capital or voting shares, either directly or indirectly, qualify as BOs. Indirect ownership is further defined as ownership of at least 25% of charter capital or voting shares through an intermediary organization. Control rights: Individuals with the authority to make or influence major decisions are considered BOs. The actual control over a company includes the power (i) to appoint or remove most or all members of the board of directors or the members’ council or the general director of a company; (ii) to amend the charter; or (iii) to decide other key matters specified in the company’s charter. Notably, individuals representing state ownership in state-owned enterprises are excluded from the scope of the BO concept. Companies are responsible for collecting, updating, and retaining information about BOs and cooperating with authorities when requested to identify BOs, among other obligations. Additionally, any companies registered before July 1, 2025, must
July 11, 2025
Vietnam’s recent embrace of “regulatory sandboxes” reflects a deliberate policy choice to balance the need for robust oversight with an equally pressing imperative to catalyze innovation. A sandbox is a controlled, time-bound framework in which businesses may pilot emerging technologies, products, or business models under relaxed or tailor-made regulatory requirements, thereby allowing regulators to observe risks in real time while innovators validate commercial viability without bearing the full weight of the traditional compliance regime. By issuing sandbox regulations, the government of Vietnam is signaling its commitment to accelerating digital transformation, attracting investment, and developing a knowledge-based economy, all while safeguarding financial stability, consumer protection, and national security. This strategy is embodied in a suite of instruments that together establish sector-specific sandboxes: Decree No. 94/2025/ND-CP on the Regulatory Sandbox in the Banking Sector (Fintech Sandbox Decree), effective July 1, 2025. Law on Digital Technology Industry (DTI Law), effective January 1, 2026, and Law on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI Law), effective October 1, 2025. Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 on International Financial Centers (IFC Resolution), effective September 1, 2025. In addition, a draft resolution on the pilot implementation of the crypto-asset market (Draft Crypto Pilot Resolution) is expected to introduce a dedicated sandbox for crypto-asset service providers later this year, further underscoring Vietnam’s holistic, forward-looking approach to regulating emerging technologies. Below is a brief summary of all the regulatory sandboxes, who they are open for, and what businesses are attracted. Fintech Sandbox Decree Under the Fintech Sandbox Decree, besides credit institutions and foreign bank branches, fintech companies operating in Vietnam can apply for a Certificate of Sandbox Participation issued by the State Bank of Vietnam to operate any of the following services in Vietnam: Credit scoring: A solution applicable to information technology systems of credit institutions, branches of foreign banks, and fintech
July 4, 2025
On July 3, 2025, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) officially announced an invitation for stakeholders to participate in a public survey to gather feedback on the flexibility and appropriateness of credit terms across different business sectors for goods and services. The TCCT initially introduced guidelines on unfair trade practices related to credit terms applicable to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in 2021, with amendments following in 2022. The guidelines have had a wide impact, as businesses have had to adapt their payment procedures and practices, particularly those for dealing with SMEs, to comply with the guidelines. The TCCT is now seeking comprehensive feedback from businesses and other stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of these guidelines. The collected responses may potentially lead to future amendments aimed at enhancing fairness and efficiency in business transactions. To summarize the core principles, the guidelines aim to improve the liquidity and cash flow of SMEs, stipulating payment terms of: Within 30 days for agricultural products or primary agricultural processing involving non-complex production. Within 45 days for trade, manufacturing, and service sectors. The guidelines also identify practices deemed unfair, including: Unjustified delays in payment beyond agreed credit terms. Changes to credit terms or contractual conditions without at least 60 days’ advance notice. Other unfair conduct or credit term conditions that impose excessive burdens on an SME. Interested stakeholders are encouraged to submit their feedback through the TCCT’s online survey form available via their official public media channels. The survey is open for responses until July 20, 2025.
July 2, 2025
On June 27, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly adopted a Resolution on International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“IFC Resolution”), which is set to take effect September 1, 2025, putting forward major policy breakthroughs on multiple fronts. The IFC Resolution has the goal of turning Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang into leading international financial centers with autonomy and tools to compete, thereby raising Vietnam’s position in the global financial network, in association with economic growth drivers. Below are some of the key points of the IFC Resolution, which has notable changes from previous drafts (see our articles on Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking and Vietnam’s Emerging Regulatory Landscape for Blockchain and Cryptocurrency), including: The removal of the Central Supervisory Agency. The addition of a definition of international financial centers, which are specific geographic areas in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang with members entitled to special policies. The addition of a list of entities eligible for membership, and entitlement to the special policies. Major Policy Breakthroughs The IFC Resolution introduces specific policies in the following areas: Liberalization of foreign exchange control for members, including policies such as open foreign exchange use between members and exemption from foreign exchange control procedures for 100% foreign-owned members. Specialized licensing for members to establish and operate single-member limited liability banks and foreign bank branches with the ability to apply accounting standards, debt classification, risk provisions, and prudential ratios according to the owner’s policies. Creation of a capital market for innovative startups, including a crowdfunding mechanism or private placement mechanism through a licensed platform, and development of a green finance market with green certification. Creation of a regulatory sandbox for fintech technologies, products, services, and business models not yet prescribed by law, offering exemption from compliance with