You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 28, 2025

Cambodia Issues New Work Regulations on Overtime, Paid Holidays, and Weekly Days Off

On May 6, 2025, Cambodia’s Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT) issued Prakas No. 112/25 on Overtime Work, Work on Paid Holidays, and Suspension of Weekly Days Off, which outlines specific conditions, formalities, and procedures in relation to working overtime, work on paid holidays, and suspension of weekly days off.

Overtime Work

Employees may be requested to perform overtime work based on the operational needs of the employer, particularly in the following circumstances:

  • When undertaking special assignments related to inventory and balance sheets, liquidation deadlines, and closing of accounting books.
  • In cases of excessive workload arising from exceptional circumstances where alternative measures are not feasible for the employer.

However, the overtime work must be conducted voluntarily and must not be enforced through coercion or disciplinary action.

Although this new prakas on overtime work does not specify the maximum allowable hours of overtime work, the Labor Law states that overtime must not cause total working hours to exceed 10 hours per day, except in cases of disaster prevention or rectification.

Work on Paid Public Holidays

Employees are entitled to paid public holidays announced annually by the MLVT. However, when work cannot be suspended, employees may be requested to perform work on paid public holidays on a voluntary basis.

Suspension of Weekly Days Off

When urgent work is required to prevent imminent accidents or to repair damage to materials, facilities, or buildings, weekly days off may be suspended for up to two nonconsecutive days per month. This applies to both employees of the affected enterprise and those of external entities engaged in the repairs of the affected enterprise.

Reduction of Weekly Days Off Due to Weather

Certain categories of enterprises are permitted to reduce employees’ weekly days off by up to two nonconsecutive days per month as compensation for working days interrupted by adverse weather conditions, such as heavy rain, flooding, and strong winds. However, employers must arrange compensatory leave for employees within 30 days.

Eligible enterprises are those engaged in the following:

  • Public works, including street cleaning, garbage collection in public areas, and the repair of streets or drainage systems;
  • Repair or replacement of water and gas pipelines, or in the renovation of residential or nonresidential building roofs;
  • Construction activities outside of enclosed buildings;
  • Operating brick kilns, mines, restaurants, or retail stores where work is performed in outdoor or unenclosed environments;
  • Inland waterway transportation;
  • Agricultural and fishing sectors, including crop harvesting and aquaculture;
  • Packaging of canned fruits, vegetables, and fish; or
  • Loading, unloading, or moving perishable goods or materials.

Compensation and Other Benefits for Overtime Work

Employers must pay employees for overtime work at the following rates:

  • 150% or one-and-a-half times the normal wages for overtime work conducted during the daytime on regular working days;
  • 200% or twice the normal wages for overtime work conducted from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. (overnight) and on weekly days off; and
  • Work performed on paid holidays can be compensated at a rate matching the employee’s regular daily wage.

In addition, employers must provide appropriate accommodation or transportation to employees following nighttime overtime work.

Procedural Requirements

Employers must submit the following information and documents to the MLVT for review and approval via the ministry’s Labor Automated Central Management System (LACMS) at least three working days before the commencement of overtime work, work on paid public holidays, or suspension of weekly days off:

  • The start and end dates;
  • The total number of employees, including the number of female employees, involved;
  • The reason for the additional work; and
  • A confirmation letter signed or thumbprinted by either two-thirds of the staff representatives or by over 50% of the total employees involved.

Employers are required to retain all relevant documentation for inspection by labor inspectors.

Penalties

Failure to comply with these provisions may result in a fine of KHR 3,360,000 (approx. USD 840) for each violation, in accordance with the Labor Law and Joint Prakas No. 498 on Monetary Fines for Those Who Violate the Labor Law, dated July 31, 2023.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.