You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 11, 2020

Cambodia Imposes Domestic Travel Restrictions and Other Measures to Limit COVID-19 Transmission

Subscribe to Updates

Domestic Travel Restrictions

On April 9, 2020, the Cambodian government issued travel restrictions within Cambodia to prevent the progression of COVID-19 to the community transmission stage, effective from 12:00 a.m. Thursday, April 9, 2020, to 12:00 a.m. Thursday, April 16, 2020.

During this period, the following are prohibited: 

  • traveling from one province to another;
  • traveling from one district to another (within one province or across provinces); or
  • traveling in or out of Phnom Penh, the capital city of Cambodia.

This order by the Cambodian government, reinforced by an official statement from the Phnom Penh City Hall, emphasized that traveling within Phnom Penh will not be affected by these travel restrictions.

Exceptions

There are, however, some exceptions to these travel restrictions, such as travel by the following vehicles or for the following purposes: 

  • transportation of all kinds of goods;
  • civil servants and members of the armed forces traveling for official business;
  • ambulances of both private and public hospitals;
  • firetrucks;
  • dump trucks;
  • transportation of workers authorized by the labor authorities; or
  • traveling to the closest hospital or health center for emergency treatment with fewer than four people at a time.

Partial Lifting of Domestic Travel Restrictions

After implementing the in-country travel restrictions, on April 10, 2020, the Government of Cambodia decided to lessen the travel restrictions slightly by: 

  • Lifting the travel restrictions between one district to another within the same province. However, the restriction on traveling between provinces remains effective, and therefore crossing between one district in one province to another district in another province is still prohibited; and
  • Treating Phnom Penh and Kandal Province (an area surrounding Phnom Penh) as one region, so that travel within and across Phnom Penh and Kandal Province is permitted. 

Measures for Workplaces

Cambodia’s Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT) also enacted the following implementation measures for the above restrictions. 

Obligations for Employees

  • Employees traveling between their residences and workplaces on their own must carry their work IDs, and their government-issued IDs or other documents showing their residential addresses. Employees traveling between their residences and workplaces on shared transportation must carry their work IDs and use vehicles that are authorized by the labor authorities. It is ambiguous whether these requirements apply only to employees that need to bypass the travel restrictions (e.g., from one province to another) or if they also apply to those who travel within the permitted areas (e.g., within Phnom Penh and Kandal Province).
  • Employees are required to come to work during the period; otherwise, employees would be considered as committing an act of serious misconduct, which would allow an employer to terminate an employee without any compensation. Presumably, this rule only applies during this domestic travel restriction period, but the MLVT’s notification is also unclear on this matter. Moreover, it is also unclear whether employees who were instructed to work from home, or those who take leave with the permission of their employers, could be considered as committing serious misconduct in this case. 
  • Employees who are at their workplaces must go to their workstations. They must not disturb other employees or disrupt their employers’ business operations. Employees are also reminded not to incite, threaten, or intimidate other employees; otherwise, they will face legal consequences under Cambodian law, such as the Penal Code.

Obligations for Employers

  • Employers must provide vehicle plate numbers to the labor inspector and cooperate with the labor inspector to obtain permits for vehicles transporting their employees. If any transportation service providers refuse to transport employees between their residences and workplaces, employers must terminate their transportation services immediately.
  • Employers must guarantee that all of their employees have work IDs, and reissue IDs to employees if they are lost. Employers must accurately record the attendance of their employees in order to provide this information to the labor inspector and other competent authorities. Again, it is questionable whether an employee who is working from home must be noted accordingly or marked as absent from the workplace. 
  • Any company that does not maintain its production and operations will not be eligible to receive any incentives or financial packages from the government.

Obligations for Employee Transportation Service Providers and Drivers

  • Transportation service providers and drivers must continue to transport employees to and from workplaces; otherwise, their service contracts may be terminated. 
  • In addition, in order to transport employees, transportation service providers must display permits on the front of their vehicles issued by the labor authorities.

Ambiguities

These measures contain several ambiguities that we hope will be addressed in subsequent regulations. 

  • The MLVT notification refers to the governmental orders for the domestic travel restrictions, and thus it could mean that these measures and rules imposed by the MLVT are only applicable during the travel restriction period. However, the MLVT does not expressly limit its application to this period; thus the duration of these measures is uncertain. 
  • It is also unclear whether all measures are applicable to employees who do not need to travel outside of restricted areas (e.g., within a province or within Phnom Penh–Kandal Province area). In particular, it is uncertain whether they need to carry their work IDs and government-issued IDs, or can only travel to work via vehicles authorized by the labor authorities if they do not have their own vehicles. 
  • These measures seem most applicable to employees working in the garment, textile, and footwear production industry, which is a major part of Cambodia’s workforce. However, if these measures are extended to other industries, the measures create a number of uncertainties. For example, if an employer has allowed its employees to work from home, and has supported other social distancing measures, it is not clear whether the employer would now have to require its employees to return to the office to work, or whether the employer must record these employees as absent and report the absent employees to the labor authorities.

Until these ambiguities become clear, companies should err on the side of caution when interpreting these rules to avoid unexpected penalties for noncompliance. 

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
Read More