You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 1, 2018

Cambodia – Implementing Guidelines Provide New Details on Labor Law Amendments

Cambodia’s Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT) has introduced two new Prakas (implementing guidelines), one of which seeks to clarify recent amendments to the country’s Labor Law pertaining to seniority payments, and the other establishes a new requirement to make salary payments twice per month. Below we set out full details of the changes.

Prakas No. 443 on Seniority Payments

On September 21, 2018, the MLVT issued Prakas No. 443 on Seniority Payments, which provides implementing guidelines for the recent amendment to the Labor Law. To recap, the amendment to the Labor Law eliminated the “indemnity for dismissal” on termination of undetermined duration contracts and replaced it with an ongoing requirement for employers to pay a new “seniority payment.” Please refer to our client alert dated August 6, 2018, for more information on the amendment to the Labor Law.

The new Prakas No. 443 provides the following implementing guidelines:

  1. Applicability of Seniority Payments to Employees with Undetermined Duration Contracts and Fixed-Term Contracts

Seniority payments only apply to an employee with an undetermined duration contract. An employee with a fixed-term contract is not entitled to a seniority payment, but is entitled to a severance payment at the end of the employee’s contract pursuant to Article 73 of the Labor Law. Article 73 provides that the severance payments must be in accordance with a collective bargaining agreement, if any, and must be at least 5 percent of all wages that the employee received during his/her employment period.

  1. Timing and Amount of Seniority Payments

As mentioned in our previous alert, an employee is entitled to an annual seniority payment of 15 days of wages and other fringe benefits.

Starting in 2019, an employer must pay each annual seniority payment in two installments, with half of the seniority payment being paid in June and the remaining half being paid in December of each year.

For a new employee, an employee is entitled to a full installment of the seniority payment (being equal to 7.5 days of wages and benefits) if the employee worked for at least one month in the applicable period (being from January to June, or July to December).

Lastly, as stated in the amendment to the Labor Law, if an employee is terminated for any reason other than the employee’s own serious misconduct, and at least one month has passed since the last seniority payment without the subsequent seniority payment being paid, then the employee is entitled to a seniority payment equal to seven days of wages and fringe benefits.

  1. Back Payments for Seniority Incurred Before 2019

An employee is entitled to seniority payments for each year worked with an existing employer for time worked before 2019 (i.e., seniority back payments). The seniority back payments equal 15 days of wages and fringe benefits for each year worked (however, there is some ambiguity in the drafting of the Prakas, which may lead to an interpretation that employees in the textile, garment, and footwear industries are entitled to a seniority back  payment based on 30 days, as opposed to 15 days).

These seniority back payments are subject to a payment cap that equals six months of the employee’s average actual salary. For an employee who worked for less than a full year or for a partial portion of a year, an employee is entitled to a full installment of the seniority payment (being equal to 7.5 days of wages and benefits) if the employee worked for at least one month in the applicable period (being from January to June, or July to December).

Back payments of the seniority payment will be paid in annual installments starting from 2019 as follows:

  • For workers in the textile, garment and footwear industries, they will be entitled to have settled 30 days of seniority back payments per year; and
  • For workers in all other industries, they will be entitled to have settled 15 days of seniority back payments per year.

Seniority back payments must be paid in the same months as the ongoing seniority payments with half of the seniority back payment being paid in June and the remaining half being paid in December.

An employee is entitled to both the seniority back payment and the ongoing seniority payment.

By way of example, if an employee has worked for a bank for five years before 2019, the employee will be entitled to 75 days of seniority back payments (5 years x 15 days). In addition, the employee will also be entitled to the ongoing seniority payment from 2019 onwards. Therefore, for the first five years, the employer will be obliged to pay the employee a seniority back payment of 15 days and an ongoing seniority payment of 15 days (for a total back and ongoing seniority payment of 30 days) each year. Half of the payment will be made in June and the remaining half will be paid in December. Once the employer has cleared the seniority back payments, the employer will only be obliged to pay the employee the ongoing seniority payment of 15 days per year.

Likewise, if an employee has worked for a garment factory for six years before 2019, the employee will be entitled to 90 days of seniority back payments (6 years x 15 days). In addition, the employee will also be entitled to the ongoing seniority payment from 2019 onwards. Therefore, for the first three years, the employer will be obliged to pay the employee a seniority back payment of 30 days and an ongoing seniority payment of 15 days (for a total back and ongoing seniority payment of 45 days) each year. Half of the payment will be made in June and the remaining half will be paid in December. Once the employer has cleared the seniority back payments, the employer will only be obliged to pay the employee the ongoing seniority payment of 15 days per year.

If an employee resigns, the employee is not entitled to any seniority back payments that remain unpaid.

  1. Remaining Ambiguities

While Prakas No. 443 has addressed many ambiguities in the Labor Law, certain ambiguities remain in the Prakas, including: 

  • whether an employee who is terminated on or after January 1, 2019, is entitled to any unpaid seniority back payments;
  • the exact formula for calculating a seniority back payment, in particular whether the seniority back payment is based current or past wages; 
  • the exact formula for calculating the payment cap of six months of the employee’s salary, in particular how to calculate the average actual salary.

We hope the MLVT will further address these issues before employers have an obligation to make seniority back payments in June 2019.

Prakas No. 442 on Payment of Wages

Under Prakas No. 442 on the Payment of Wages, all employers are required to pay salaries to all employees twice per month starting from January 2019. The first half of the salary payment must be made in the second week of the month, and the second half of the salary payment must be made in the fourth week of the month. Any remaining amounts and other benefits owed to employees (such as overtime) should be paid at the time of the second half of the salary payment.
 

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.