You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 14, 2019

Cambodia Enacts a New E-commerce Law and a Consumer Protection Law

In support of Cambodia’s rapidly growing economy, the Cambodian government enacted the Law on Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law) and the Law on Consumer Protection (Consumer Protection Law) on November 2, 2019. Both of these new laws change the legal landscape in important ways for businesses under their purview. 

E-commerce Law

The E-commerce Law regulates domestic and cross-border e-commerce activities in Cambodia, establishes legal certainty for electronic transactions, and enacts a number of important protections for consumers.  

The E-commerce Law broadly applies to all commercial and civil acts, documents, and transactions executed via an electronic system, except those that are related to powers of attorney, wills and successions, and real estate. The E-commerce Law grants the Cambodian government the authority to issue further regulations to limit the law’s scope; thus it will be necessary to monitor whether other types of transactions are later excluded from the scope of the law. 

The E-commerce Law has 12 chapters, 67 articles, and one annex. 

  • The first chapter contains general provisions on the aim, purpose, and scope of the law, as briefly described above, and refers to the annex, which contains a glossary of 38 key terms used throughout the law.  
  • The second and third chapters deal with the validity and process of electronic communications, including clarifying the regulatory requirements for recognizing electronic agreements and e-signatures. These chapters also discuss certain technical matters, such as when and where electronic communications are considered sent and received. 
  • The fourth chapter addresses the security of electronic records and e-signatures, and specifically prohibits identity theft. 
  • The fifth chapter is material to electronic-commerce service providers and intermediaries. This chapter covers potential liabilities for third-party content on platforms and content takedown requests. Furthermore, service providers and intermediaries, possibly including foreign entities making their platforms accessible in Cambodia, may be subject to a licensing regime and codes of conduct in Cambodia.
  • The sixth chapter contains legal provisions on consumer protection on e-commerce platforms, including matters on adequate information requirements, scams, malicious codes, and data protection. Interestingly, this chapter specifically requires both domestic and foreign e-commerce businesses, regardless of their places of business, to comply with the legal obligations regarding unsolicited emails. 
  • The seventh chapter governs electronic acts and transactions by the Cambodian government, which may facilitate governmental agencies using online application forms in the future. 
  • The eighth chapter gives legal recognition to the use of evidence in an electronic form in Cambodian legal proceedings.
  • The ninth chapter further regulates electronic fund transfers and payments. Banking and financial institutions should be aware of this chapter as it imposes certain obligations and liabilities on them concerning electronic fund transfers and payments. For instance, when a banking and financial institution has received a customer’s notification that his or her electronic payment instrument has been lost or stolen, banking and financial institutions are now liable for any transactions occurring after the notification.
  • The tenth chapter designates the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications as the competent authorities who may issue warnings and disciplinary sanction decisions on e-commerce matters.
  • The eleventh chapter outlines a number of penalties, such as fines and imprisonments, on persons violating provisions of the E-commerce Law. 
  • The last chapter notes that the E-commerce Law will not be implemented until May 2, 2020, which leaves time for government agencies to prepare any necessary implementing regulations required under the law, and for private companies to prepare for compliance. 

As businesses have almost six months to prepare for the implementation of the E-commerce Law, we recommend that they familiarize themselves with the new requirements of the law and watch out for additional implementing regulations that are likely to be released before the full implementation of the law on May 2, 2020. 

Consumer Protection Law

The Consumer Protection Law establishes rules to guarantee the rights of consumers and to ensure that businesses conduct commercial competition in Cambodia fairly. The Consumer Protection Law applies to any person who conducts any trading activities with consumers in Cambodia, regardless of whether the trading activities are for profit. The law applies to the sale of goods, services, and real rights over immovable property.

The Consumer Protection Law has 11 chapters and 51 articles.

  • The first three chapters touch on introductory and general provisions, and explain the aims and purposes of the law and key definitions. Importantly, these chapters establish the National Committee on Consumer Protection (NCCP) as Cambodia’s competent authority for consumer protection and empower consumers in each industry to form an association to protect their interests.
  • The fourth and fifth chapters regulate unfair trading activities and unfair practices. These deal, for example, with false, misleading, or deceptive advertisements, and business models equivalent to pyramid schemes.
  • The sixth chapter sets out minimum information standards that businesses must meet in connection with consumers, such as labeling requirements. These minimum information standards will be more specifically set by the relevant industry regulators. One notable element of the standards is that all information must be provided in the Khmer language.
  • The seventh to the ninth chapters establish the procedures for the NCCP to receive consumer complaints, carry out investigations, and issue decisions, and the rules for appealing the NCCP’s decisions. 
  • The tenth and eleventh chapters present a number of penalties for non-compliance with the Consumer Protection Law, including disciplinary sanctions, fines, and imprisonment. 

The Consumer Protection Law became effective upon promulgation on November 2, 2019, and prudent businesses should therefore immediately review the law to understand their compliance requirements and prepare accordingly.

For more information, please contact our Phnom Penh office on [email protected] or at +855 23 964 210.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 23, 2026
On February 17, 2026, Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) released its draft Guidelines on Personal Data Protection in the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. The draft guidelines, which translate data controller and data processor compliance obligations under the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) into measures tailored to AI development and deployment, are open for public comment until February 25, 2026. At a public hearing session on the draft guidelines held on February 19, the PDPC emphasized that its approach to AI is not to hinder innovation but to develop practical guidance supporting safe deployment while ensuring data protection. Although the guidelines are not legally binding, they indicate the regulator’s expectations and the likely direction of interpretation and enforcement. Scope of Application and Role of Stakeholders The guidelines will apply to all data controllers and data processors in Thailand, and to overseas data controllers and data processors whose data processing falls within the extraterritorial scope of the PDPA. The draft guidelines distinguish the roles of parties involved in AI deployment. Users of AI who determine the purpose of use and designate the input data, and retain outputs generated by the AI, are considered data controllers. In contrast, AI model providers or system integrators that process personal data under the instructions of the data controller are generally regarded as data processors. However, if an AI model provider utilizes user data for its own purposes, such as model fine-tuning or training, it may instead be classified as a data controller. Key Obligations for AI Data Collection and Use The basic principles of data processing under the PDPA must be maintained throughout the AI implementation lifecycle, from design to decommissioning, emphasizing accountability and privacy-by-design principles. The draft guidelines also stipulate the following: Data processing agreements (DPAs) should include model training prohibitions,
February 10, 2026
Data center and cloud investments are forming a major focus of private-sector investment in Thailand, with tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and TikTok, as well as numerous telecom and data center companies, committing significant outlays to data center and cloud development. The country’s Board of Investment (BOI) approved projects worth THB 1.87 trillion in 2025, and THB 746 billion of this was from planned data center investments—by far the largest amount from any single industry. Thailand’s swift rise as a regional data center hub is fueled by surging demand for cloud, AI, and digital services, as well as large-scale investments from global tech firms. The country’s strategic location, competitive power costs, robust fiber infrastructure, expanding IT talent, and supportive government policies—including BOI incentives and streamlined approvals—have made it an attractive destination for scalable and sustainable digital infrastructure investments. The BOI’s proactive approach in updating promoted categories and providing both tax and non-tax incentives further ensures Thailand’s continued growth in this sector. 2025 BOI Changes for Data Centers In the middle of 2025, the BOI responded to the remarkable trend by updating investment‑promotion categories across various sectors (e.g., machinery and electrical equipment, public utilities, digital and innovative industries) to accommodate growing investment in data‑center projects. Before the change, which was detailed in a notification that has applied to investment promotion applications submitted from July 1, 2025, onward, data‑center projects under BOI promotion were granted a single A1 incentive (an eight‑year corporate income‑tax exemption) and subject to one uniform set of conditions. The July 2025 notification restructured promotion for data centers into two categories based on power‑usage efficiency: high‑efficiency data centers and other data centers. Under these rules, qualified high‑efficiency data centers are eligible for an eight‑year corporate income tax (CIT) exemption, while for other data centers this exemption is
February 4, 2026
On November 18, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance released for public consultation a draft decree on administrative sanctions in the field of crypto assets and crypto asset markets (the “Draft Decree”), intended to implement Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP dated September 9, 2025, on the pilot crypto asset market in Vietnam (“Resolution 05”). While Resolution 05 sets out who may participate and under what conditions, the Draft Decree addresses a more practical question for market participants, i.e., what happens if those conditions are not met. In doing so, the Draft Decree offers important insight into how Vietnamese regulators intend to supervise, discipline, and ultimately shape the crypto market during the pilot phase. Regulatory Scope and Overall Sanctions Architecture The Draft Decree applies to both domestic and foreign organizations and individuals engaging in crypto-related activities in Vietnam’s market. Covered entities include: (i) crypto asset issuers; (ii) crypto asset service providers, including trading platforms and market operators; (iii) Vietnamese and foreign investors participating in the pilot market; and (iv) other organizations involved in the offering, issuance, or provision of crypto-related services in Vietnam. The breadth of this scope is deliberate. It appears to reflect a regulatory view that cross-border structures, offshore platforms, and indirect participation may not necessarily insulate market actors from compliance obligations once they operate within the pilot framework. For the crypto industry, this may mark a shift from regulatory ambiguity toward a more explicit articulation of jurisdictional reach. At first glance, the Draft Decree’s monetary penalties appear restrained. The maximum fine per administrative violation is capped at VND 200 million (approx. USD 7,700) for organizations and VND 100 million (approx. USD 3,800) for individuals. However, focusing solely on fine levels risks missing the point. The Draft Decree also places great regulatory weight on supplementary sanctions and corrective measures, including: (i)
January 30, 2026
Thailand’s Data Privacy Day 2026, hosted by the Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC), underscored the country’s commitment to strengthening personal data protection, advancing regulatory maturity, and preparing organizations for the next phase of PDPA enforcement. The event marked a clear shift from policy-level compliance toward “Privacy in Action,” signaling that operational readiness and real-world implementation are now priorities. The Office of the PDPC also emphasized that data protection is now a national economic enabler that supports digital trust, competitiveness, and sustainable growth, not just a compliance obligation. The following insights summarize the key takeaways from the Data Privacy Day 2026 event. PDPA in Real Life: What Happens to Your Data Today The Office of the PDPC provided concrete data on enforcement trends and real-world compliance issues facing organizations across Thailand. Complaints and trends. The Office of the PDPC’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) Center recorded 2,672 PDPA-related complaints as of January 2026, with the highest volumes involving failure to comply with the data minimization principle, collection without lawful basis, and use and disclosure without lawful basis. Administrative penalties. Several administrative penalties have been imposed on data controllers and data processors across various sectors, including government, healthcare, retail, SMEs and e-commerce, ranging from tens of thousands to several million baht. Most violations stemmed from weak security measures, failure to notify data breaches within the required timeline, absence of a data protection officer (DPO) when required, and noncompliance with governance requirements such as the Record of Processing Activities (ROPA) and data processing agreements with data processors. Case studies. The Office of the PDPC highlighted specific examples of violations: Hospitals misused personal data for purposes beyond their intended scope (e.g., using personal data collected for providing medical services to send birthday cards) Vendors compromised systems due to inadequate password