You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 29, 2020

Cambodia: Employers have gained positive insights from COVID-19 pandemic

Taylor Vinters – International Employment Law Update

The Cambodian Government, like many other countries, tightened its border controls and shut down certain businesses to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Whilst many of these businesses are now reopening and more international travelers are now entering Cambodia, the COVID-19 pandemic is still having a significant impact on Cambodia’s economy, which is heavily dependent on international trade and tourism.

In particular, the garment and footwear and hospitality industries have been hit hardest by the fall in international orders and lack of international tourists; resulting in high numbers of suspended and laid off employees.

There have been challenges for employers during this difficult time; however, it has also provided an opportunity to gain some insight into several matters:

  • Responsiveness of authorities: During the COVID-19 pandemic the Government took a number of decisive actions to support the private sector and employees, including: providing tax exemptions and tax relief for certain industries; providing salary support for employees in the garment, footwear, and tourism sectors; providing flexibility on the duration of employee suspensions; and eliminating certain statutory payments. This has helped some companies remain in business and allowed employees to retain their jobs whilst they have been unable to work.
  • Practical implications for fixed term and permanent employment contracts: Cambodian law allows employment under fixed term contracts or permanent contracts of undetermined duration. Both types of contract can be terminated for force majeure reasons. Short of force majeure, a permanent contact allows an employer significantly greater flexibility to reduce its workforce based on economic conditions, and usually with lower severance costs. Going forward employers may give this more consideration.
  • Use of online services: During the pandemic the Department of Intellectual Property Rights began accepting online submissions for affidavits of use/non-use and renewals. The Ministry of Commerce (MOC), the General Department of Taxation (GDT) and the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MOL) launched a new business registration website whereby companies could register at each of the three ministries at the same time. Previously, while the MOC had an online registration procedure, it was necessary to submit separate physical applications at the GDT and the MOL. In general, there has been an increased reliance by companies on certain online services, such as online banking and payment services; it is likely this will continue to increase, as companies become more self-sufficient and autonomous. It is expected overtime, we will see a greater shift towards more flexible working trends and online-based businesses in order to generally increase efficiency and productivity levels within the workforce.

Comment

The global pandemic has clearly had an impact on the way that businesses will operate going forward, and will revolutionise the way that employees work and whether they need to be at their employer’s premises at all to carry out their duties. There will be certain considerations for employers in respect of their employees’ employment contracts to ensure greater protection for their businesses in the event of force majeure events in the future.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
January 26, 2021
On January 1, 2021, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 152/2020/ND-CP dated December 30, 2020, providing guidance concerning foreigners working in Vietnam (Decree 152). Foreign investors and expatriates should be aware of some notable new points.
January 12, 2021
Due to the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand since December, 2020, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor recently published two regulations under the Social Security Act (SSA) in the Government Gazette: The Regulation on Entitlement to Compensatory Benefits in the Event of Unemployment Due to Force Majeure from the Pandemic of Dangerous Communicable Disease Under Relevant Law Relating to Communicable Diseases B.E. 2563 (2020) (the Force Majeure Regulation); and The Regulation on Determination of the Amount of Contributions to the Social Security Funds B.E. 2563 (2020) (the SSF Contribution Regulation). Details of the two regulations are provided below. The Force Majeure Regulation This regulation is similar to a previous regulation from April, 2020, during the first wave of the pandemic, stating that the definition of force majeure under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990) (the SSA) includes hazards from pandemics of dangerous communicable diseases (including COVID-19). This definition therefore affords protection to insured persons (i.e., employees) in the event that the COVID-19 pandemic results in their being unable to work, or their employers being unable to operate their business normally. This regulation allows the Social Security Office (SSO) to pay compensation to employees who: are insured persons who qualify to receive compensatory benefit in case of unemployment in accordance with the SSA; have to cease working temporarily during the period from December 19, 2020 onwards; and do not receive wages from their employer during the temporary cessation. This applies only if the circumstances above result from the following force majeure events related to hazards from COVID-19 (or other pandemics of dangerous communicable diseases that affect the public under the Communicable Diseases Act B.E. 2558 (2015)): The employee cannot work, or the employer does not allow the employee to work, because of quarantine or to comply with a COVID-19
November 3, 2020
Many Thai and international companies have expanded rapidly into Myanmar in recent years, in what had seemed to be an unstoppable expansion of cross-border trade resulting from the country’s emergence back onto the global stage. For those companies, the COVID-19 situation in Myanmar has been a cause for much concern and uncertainty—doubly so for those who had hired staff in the jurisdiction, as a lack of clarity regarding their obligations as employers was compounded by a lack of information on the situation on the ground.