You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 9, 2023

Cambodia Compliance Reminder: Product Registration and Labeling Requirements for Prepackaged Foods

Cambodia imports a substantial amount of food products to meet its domestic demand. Most of these imported products are from nearby ASEAN countries, with Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam providing the bulk of these food imports. However, food products from markets further away are becoming more popular each year, including brands from Australia, Japan, China, the EU, South-Korea, and the US.

Many food product owners and distributors do not realize that all types of prepackaged food products, including imports, require product registration before they are permitted to be sold in Cambodia. This usually requires an assessment against mandatory Cambodian Standards and local technical regulations. There are general Cambodian Standards that cover all types of prepackaged food products, as well as product-specific standards and regulations that may be applicable.

Furthermore, any type of prepackaged food product sold in Cambodia must bear a Khmer language label that meets the minimum consumer information standards, and the Cambodian Standards. This label requirement is often overlooked, with many products on the market bearing only a foreign language label.

Product Registration & Labeling Requirements

Back in 2000, a Cambodian Standard on prepackaged food labeling was adopted, clearly mandating Khmer language labeling for all types of prepackaged foods. Unfortunately, this labeling standard was not widely adopted by the industry, and even today compliance is low.

Low compliance, combined with a lack of widespread enforcement efforts, led to a misguided understanding that imported food products were not subject to any standards, did not require product registration, and were not required to bear Khmer language labeling.

Recent legal developments related to consumer protection and food safety clarified several of these misunderstandings. For example, the regulations clearly state that all types of food product must meet the applicable standards and technical regulations, which is assessed through registration. The new Law on Food Safety clearly states Khmer language labeling is required, and that the Cambodian Standard on prepackaged food labeling must be met.

The Institute of Standards of Cambodia

With the adoption of the Law on Standards in 2007, the Institute of Standards of Cambodia (ISC) was established and tasked to take the lead on standardization in Cambodia.

In recent years, we have seen a push for further standardization, to bolster international trade. Many of the new standards follow international standards, ensuring that imported products are high quality and safe for consumers. In addition, applying international standards to Cambodian-made products will mean easier access to export markets, as well as increased consumer protection.

Under the authority of the ISC, several mandatory Cambodian Standards and technical regulations related to food products have been adopted. The ISC also adopted product registration and assessment procedures to check products against the standards, and to issue approvals to use a product registration mark. This product registration mark bust be shown on product labeling, if the product is sold in Cambodia.

We expect the ISC to increase inspection efforts surrounding Cambodian Standards and technical regulations in the coming years. In 2021, a Sub-Decree was issued, addressing both the inspection powers for ISC officers and the penalties for non-compliance with standards. This is a clear signal that the government, and the ISC specifically, intend to step up their enforcement efforts. In addition, we understand that they have recently been notifying local companies of the need for compliance and warning of potential penalties.

Product Registration Mark

During the prepackaged food product registration process at the ISC, the food product is assessed against the mandatory Cambodian Standards and any technical regulations – including the Khmer language labeling standard.

When the process is complete, the ISC issues a license to use the product registration mark on the product label. This mark shows consumers that the product has been duly registered and assessed, and thus serves as a quality and safety mark for consumers.

For certain types of food, a second product registration process must be undergone with the Ministry of Health’s Department of Drugs & Foods. The department also issues a mark as evidence of registration, which must be borne on the product label.

Observation would suggest that most products on the market are not currently in compliance with these standards. Many products do not show the registration marks, or do not use Cambodian language labeling. Given recent legal developments and an increased focus on enforcement, this is likely to change.

Increased Consumer Protection Efforts

Since 2019, there has been a push by the Cambodian government for increased consumer protection. This push includes updating the regulatory framework and increasing enforcement efforts.

In line with the push for more regulation, the Law on Consumer Protection was adopted in 2019, followed by the Law on Food Safety in 2022. Shortly after these major legislative developments, several implementing regulations related to good safety have been adopted.

The regulations cover topics such as enforcement powers and procedures, food recall and seizure procedures, the minimum consumer information requirements for product labeling, and the inspection powers of enforcement officers. The enforcement authorities have issued several warning notices in local media to inform the industry that they intend to enforce the laws and regulations.

In addition, the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Economy & Finance issued an inter-ministerial prakas (ministerial regulation) on July 17, 2023, setting monetary fines for violations of the Law on Food Safety.

The above shows clear intent on the part of the authorities to enforce the Law on Food Safety and the related regulations. The regulatory framework has been clarified and the associated penalties and enforcement powers are now set.

Enforcement Efforts related to Food Safety

Enforcement is not centralized in one agency in Cambodia.

Depending on the specific violation, several authorities are permitted to act. Some of the agencies that are active in this area include the Anti-Economic Crime Police Department, the Cambodia Counter-Counterfeit Committee, and the Consumer Protection, Competition, and Fraud Repression Directorate-General. Furthermore, as noted above, the ISC has adopted an inspection Sub-Decree, meaning they will likely conduct more on-site inspections. Lastly, the Ministry of Health’s Department of Drugs & Food may also conduct inspections through its Food Safety Bureau and designated inspection officers.

Over the past three years, we have seen a clear focus by these enforcement authorities on food safety issues. Local media report almost weekly on the efforts of authorities taking action in cities and rural areas, seizing non-compliant goods and penalizing violators.

In addition, minimum information requirements for food products are now enforced more strictly. This includes the information provided to consumers via labeling on products, and via advertisements. The rationale is that the consumer must receive sufficient and truthful information to make an informed decision prior to purchasing a product.

A key feature of these regulations has been mandating Khmer language to ensure a full understanding by Cambodian consumers. However, the industry still has a long way to go to implement Khmer language on their product labeling and advertising. Based on Tilleke & Gibbins’ recent market surveys, foreign-language-only product labels and advertisements remains prevalent.

Shifting Focus related to Food Safety

Initial enforcement actions were focused on removing unsafe foods from the market. For example, strong enforcement action was taken against products that were past their expiry date, or against foods that were considered unsafe for consumption after sample field testing. These products were immediately seized from the market, and in some cases, recalls were ordered and forcibly executed.

A notable case involved coordination among several ministries, eventually involving Customs, in an effort to completely block the further import and distribution of a non-compliant overseas product. This blockade remained in force until the food safety issues were resolved.

However, more recently we have recently seen the first signs of increased enforcement efforts purely based on a lack of registration, or when products have non-compliant labeling. The authorities are actively warning local distributors of the risk of penalties for failing to comply with the registration and labeling regulations, signaling a shift in focus away from just unsafe foods to wider non-compliance.

Concluding Remarks

We advise both local and overseas companies to review their Cambodian product portfolio, and to move to full compliance. Even where only the local distributor or retail partner will legally be subject to the enforcement actions and penalties, negative media stories resulting from enforcement actions can harm a brand’s reputation in the market.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
June 17, 2026
Thailand’s new labeling requirements for medical devices, which include for the first time a unique device identification (UDI) requirement for software as a medical device (SaMD), take effect on June 20, 2026. The Notification of the Ministry of Public Health regarding Criteria, Methods, and Conditions on Labeling and Instructions for Use for Medical Devices 2025, which replaces a similar notification from 2020, was published in the Government Gazette on December 22, 2025. To ensure clarity, modernity, and patient safety, the regulation requires domestic manufacturers and importers to provide labels and instructions for use (IFU) that are clearly legible, complete, and free of false or misleading claims. It also permits IFU to be provided in electronic format, such as via QR codes, websites, or other digital channels—directly relevant to SaMD, where physical labels are impractical and electronic presentation is the natural medium. The notification distinguishes two categories for labeling language. Home-use medical devices (for lay users outside healthcare facilities) must have labels and IFU in Thai. Professional-use medical devices may display labels and documentation in either Thai or English. This distinction is significant for SaMD developers: software intended for clinical professionals may use English-language interfaces and IFU, while consumer-facing health applications must provide Thai-language content. Labeling and UDI Requirements Labels and IFU must include, at a minimum: Product name and intended purpose Quantity or volume Name and address of domestic manufacturer or importer Thai FDA approval number Lot, version, or serial number Manufacturing date and expiry date For SaMD, the version number requirement is particularly relevant. The regulation also mandates display of a UDI code for SaMD in risk category 2 (moderate-risk), category 3 (moderate- to high-risk), and category 4 (high-risk), according to Thailand’s medical device risk classification system (which complies with the ASEAN Medical Device Directive and the EU
May 11, 2026
Thailand’s rise as a regional hub for luxury retail has influenced how market entry is structured and assessed across Southeast Asia. As brands consider establishing a presence in the market, regulatory and operational considerations form a key part of the overall entry assessment. Foreign Ownership Restrictions for Retailers Foreign investment in retail activities is subject to a relatively extensive regulatory framework, particularly in relation to foreign ownership and the approvals required under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Under the FBA, a company is generally regarded as foreign if 50% or more of its shares are held by non-Thai nationals, in which case the business is required to obtain a foreign business license (FBL) issued by the director-general of the Department of Business Development, with the approval of the Foreign Business Committee. The committee will not grant an FBL unless it is convinced the proposed business demonstrates unique characteristics such as a distinctive business model, innovative processes, specialized services or products, or a clear competitive differentiation that will benefit Thailand; constitutes a highly specialized business or requires specialized technology or expertise; and will not compete with Thai business operators who engage in the same business. The committee makes its decisions on a case-by-case basis depending on the circumstances, which can make the licensing process less predictable in practice. However, there are also alternative pathways for consideration, including exemptions in specific circumstances. For example, foreign-owned businesses in Thailand with at least THB 100 million in registered capital are allowed to open five retail stores in the country. Some businesses may also be able to access preferential treatment under international agreements and treaties between Thailand and certain foreign states, subject to eligibility requirements. Structural and Business Model Challenges The determination of what constitutes a “retail store” may itself present
May 8, 2026
Thailand has liberalized its wine import regime, allowing, for the first time, multiple importers to bring in and distribute the same wine brands. On March 27, 2026, the Ministry of Finance issued the Ministerial Regulation on the Importation of Alcoholic Beverages (No. 3) 2026, which waives the requirement to appoint a sole authorized agent for alcoholic beverages to be specified in notifications from the Excise Department. The Excise Department has already issued its first such notification, expressly exempting wine and sparkling wine made from grapes from the sole agent requirement. For all other types of alcoholic beverages (e.g., beer, tequila, spirits) the sole agent requirement remains in force, and applicants for importer licenses must provide evidence of exclusive distributorship issued by the manufacturer or brand owner. The exemption may be extended to other alcoholic beverage categories through future Excise Department notifications. Implications for Competition and Tourism The reform allows multiple importers to bring in and distribute the same wine brand without routing through the brand owner’s designated exclusive importer, reducing monopolization and boosting competition. Excise Department Director-General Pornchai Thirawet noted that wine was chosen as the starting point because implementation is straightforward in this case and because domestic wine prices remain high—with increased competition expected to exert downward pressure on prices. More broadly, the reform is intended to lower market entry barriers, expand supply, and make wine more accessible to Thai consumers, while supporting Thailand’s position as a regional tourism hub. Product Quality Control and Loss of Sole Agent Accountability Under the previous framework, the designated importer bore full responsibility for the proper storage, handling, and distribution of wine and sparkling wine from importation to final sale. This arrangement helped ensure that products were maintained under appropriate conditions, including temperature control, light exposure, and humidity management, to preserve quality