You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 14, 2022

Cambodia Begins Implementation of National Pension Scheme

Subscribe to Updates

On July 5, 2022, Cambodia issued regulations implementing the pension system of the National Social Security Fund (NSSF). Pension contributions will begin on October 1, 2022.

The implementation is detailed in Prakas No. 168 on the Procedures and Formalities for Registering Enterprises, Institutions, Workers, and Employees, and Contributions for all Persons Defined by Provisions of Labor Law (Prakas No. 168) and Prakas No. 170 on the Commencement Date of Pension Contribution for the Compulsory Contribution and Voluntary Contribution.

Registration and Benefits

All employees and employers previously registered with the NSSF for health and accident insurance are automatically enrolled in the pension scheme, with no additional registration necessary. Both new and existing nonregistered employers with at least one employee must register their company with the NSSF within 30 days of Prakas No. 168 entering into force or on the date of establishing the company. Nonregistered employees are required to be registered with the NSSF no later than three days from the start of their employment.

The NSSF pension system features four categories of benefits: old-age pension, incapacity/disability pension, survivor pension, and funerary benefits. The amount of benefits available to an NSSF member is based on a percentage of the person’s total contributions and the period of those contributions.

Compulsory Contributions

The pension contribution is a joint responsibility shared equally by employers and employees. The rates of contribution will increase in steps as the NSSF pension program is phased in. The phases are as follows:

  • Phase 1: In years 1–5, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of employee wages from the starting date of initial contribution.
  • Phase 2: In years 6–10, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 8% of employee wages.
  • Phase 3: After the pension program has been in place for 10 years, total compulsory pension contributions will increase to 10.75% of employee wages. There will be an additional increase of 2.75% after each subsequent 10-year period elapses. (No information has been provided on whether there is a cap on future increases.)

The monthly wage used for the NSSF contribution calculation is capped at KHR 1,200,000 (approx. USD 300).

Monthly pension contributions must be processed no later than the 15th day of the following month. Therefore, for example, pension contributions for March must be paid by April 15. Employers that wish to pay contributions annually must submit a request to the NSSF for approval.

Employers are released from the obligation for making compulsory contributions for registered employees who are 60 years of age and older. However, registered employees 60 years of age and older as of July 1, 2022, can make voluntary contributions by submitting a request to the NSSF within 12 months of Prakas No. 168 entering into force (i.e., until July 5, 2023).

Voluntary Contributions

The NSSF pension scheme also allows for voluntary contributions to be made if the NSSF member is:

  • Unemployed, under 60 years of age, and financially able to continue making contributions;
  • Over 60 years of age and intending to continue making contributions; or
  • Earning income higher than the wage ceiling of the compulsory system.

Voluntary contributions increase the total contribution of the NSSF member, and will ultimately increase future pension benefits available to them. Contributions made under the voluntary system must be equal to or greater than the contributions made under the compulsory framework, and individual contributors should coordinate their voluntary payments with the NSSF directly.

To learn more about the new NSSF pension scheme, or any aspect of employment law in Cambodia, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].

This update was prepared with the assistance of Tilleke & Gibbins intern Robert Gassman.

Related Professionals

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 30, 2025
On March 4, 2025, Cambodia’s Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT) issued Prakas No. 073/25 on Procedures for Resolving Individual Labor Disputes, replacing Prakas No. 318 on the same topic from 2001 and introducing significant changes to how individual labor disputes are filed, processed, and escalated. In addition, Prakas No. 073 outlines the roles and responsibilities of labor inspectors, the process for filing and handling complaints, and the steps for conciliation and further legal recourse, as described below. Filing a Complaint Any party to an individual labor dispute can file a complaint with the Labor Dispute Department of the MLVT or the Department of Labor at the capital or provincial level. Upon receiving a complaint, a labor inspector will review the case and may initiate either conciliation or a labor inspection. Invitation letters will be issued to the disputing parties to provide relevant information and documents. Conciliation Process Prakas No. 073 places strong emphasis on the conciliation process, introducing strict procedural rules and deadlines with clear consequences for noncompliance: If the claimant fails to provide required information within the specified deadline (or within three working days thereafter without reasonable excuse), the complaint is deemed void. If the respondent fails to attend the conciliation meeting within the deadline (or within three working days thereafter without reasonable excuse), the conciliation is considered unsuccessful, and the respondent is deemed guilty as claimed. Once all necessary information is gathered, a labor inspector will invite both parties to a joint conciliation meeting, which must be held within three weeks of the complaint being received. If the claimant fails to attend the meeting or sign the minutes without a reasonable excuse, the complaint is void. If the respondent fails to attend the meeting without a reasonable excuse, the conciliation is unsuccessful, and the respondent
Read More
June 27, 2025
Three American giants are actively protecting their intellectual property rights against generative AI, as two legal battles commence on both sides of the Atlantic. In the UK, Seattle-based media company Getty Images accuses UK-based Stability AI of multiple IP infringements. In the US, The Walt Disney Company and Universal Studios are teaming up against Midjourney, an AI startup, with their main ground being copyright infringement. Both cases are centered around questions legal minds have been posing since the introduction of generative AI: Is the output of generative AI an infringement? And who is ultimately responsible for the output, the platform or the user? Getty Images v. Stability AI Getty initially filed a claim in the High Court in 2023, which resulted in Stability applying for reverse summary judgment on the grounds that Getty had no real prospect of success, arguing that their operations took place outside the UK. However, the High Court judge hearing the case decided that the claims brought by Getty did have a real prospect of succeeding in court. Despite this, Stability saw a small victory when the court ruled that the representative action brought by Getty would not succeed due to the difficulties in identifying who qualified for the class. The proposed class was comprised of 50,000 rightsholders who alleged their rights were also infringed. Stability was successful in arguing that identifying these individuals would be challenging due to the unclear definition of the class. This current trial is centered around four main grounds: Copyright infringement. Getty accuses Stability of using content that Getty owns or has an exclusive license for when training their model, Stable Diffusion, resulting in the generated output containing substantial parts of that content. Getty is also alleging secondary copyright infringement, arguing that Stability is importing an article into the UK
Read More
June 27, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Taking and Enforcing Collateral Security and Guarantees in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide developed by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication examines the legal frameworks governing collateral security and guarantees across seven Southeast Asian jurisdictions and is intended to assist financial institutions, corporate borrowers, and cross-border investors in evaluating secured lending options in the region. The guide provides a practical overview of key issues relevant to taking and enforcing security interests—covering, among other topics, the types of assets that may be secured, the formalities and registration requirements for creating security, and the rights and procedures available in enforcement scenarios. Each chapter follows a consistent question-and-answer format to allow readers to compare approaches across jurisdictions easily. While the guide offers a high-level survey of the region’s collateral and guarantee regimes, it also notes that country-specific developments and transaction-specific considerations may affect the applicable requirements. Readers seeking detailed advice are encouraged to consult the lawyers listed at the end of each jurisdictional chapter. The full guide is available for download using the button below or directly from the DNA website.
Read More
June 25, 2025
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is no longer a distant innovation confined to science fiction and research labs; it has become an integral part of daily business operations worldwide. Employees across industries are adopting GenAI tools at a remarkable pace—including in Southeast Asia, where a tech-savvy workforce and widespread internet and mobile access have driven early adoption. The reality facing organizations today is clear: employees are integrating GenAI into their daily work, often without official approval or clear policies. This phenomenon, often called “Bring Your Own AI,” comes out of a disconnect between organizational governance and employee behavior and reveals the urgent need for proactive AI policies and oversight. For business leaders and legal teams, GenAI is both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, these tools can deliver real business value and boost efficiency. On the other, the unsanctioned and unmonitored use of GenAI introduces substantial legal risks, such as data privacy violations, confidentiality breaches, and intellectual property issues. The widespread adoption of GenAI tools by employees, regardless of official organizational stance or guidelines, demonstrates that prohibition is neither practical nor effective. A more strategic approach involves establishing comprehensive governance policies that encourage responsible AI use while managing the risks. Organizations that take the lead in developing GenAI governance policies are better positioned to benefit from its transformative potential. The question isn’t whether GenAI will change how we work, but how quickly organizations can put the right safeguards in place to manage this change successfully. Risks of GenAI Use The use of GenAI in business operations, whether sanctioned or not, exposes organizations to a unique set of risks. The following are particularly relevant: Data security and confidentiality: General GenAI tools in the market may transmit data to external servers, retain conversation histories, and use inputs for model training.
Read More