You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 6, 2019

BOI Merges Two Promoted Activities into New International Business Centers

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

On December 11, 2018, the Board of Investment (BOI) issued two new announcements: one canceling the International Headquarters (IHQ) and International Trade Centers (ITC) categories of activities for investment promotion, and one introducing a new category called International Business Centers (IBCs). The IHQ and ITC categories had existed in some form for almost a decade (previously existing in slightly different forms as Regional Operating Headquarters and International Procurement Offices, until they were canceled and replaced by the IHQ and ITC categories for applications submitted in 2015 onward).   

This change is intended to make investment in Thailand more attractive to the global community by implementing new international tax standards under the OECD’s Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, which Thailand acceded to in June 2017. The framework encourages countries to adjust their tax measures to eradicate inadvertent “gaps and mismatches” in the tax regimes of different jurisdictions, effectively harmonizing tax rules between member jurisdictions. This is intended to prevent exploitation of these “gaps and mismatches,” which have long been used by savvy international tax structures that move capital from one jurisdiction to another, benefiting from favorable tax regimes along the way.    

Although the new IBC category is, in principle, merely a combination of the old IHQ and ITC schemes, in practice there are some key new changes that investors—especially those familiar with the old IHQ and ITC schemes—should be aware of.

Eligible Activities for an IBC

Registered Capital   

As with the IHQ and ITC, the paid-up registered capital of an IBC must be at least THB 10 million.

Employment   

Unlike the IHQ and ITC, an IBC is required to have at least 10 skilled employees. A limited exception is available to IBCs that only provide treasury center services to affiliated enterprises, for which the requirement is reduced to five. This is a new requirement and was not included under the IHQ or ITC categories.

IBC Privileges – Board of Investment   

The BOI privileges available to IBCs are generally the same as those under the IHQ and ITC schemes, and are mostly non-tax incentive privileges, such as the right to operate a business with a foreign majority structure, favorable work permit terms for foreign expatriates, the right to own land, etc.

Companies that apply for IBC privileges also enjoy an import duty exemption for machines imported for use in research and development or for training purposes. How- ever, a privilege for import duty on raw or essential materials used in manufacturing of exported products would not be available for IBCs, nor would merit-based privileges.

IBC Privileges – Revenue Department   

It is also possible for IBCs to benefit from tax incentives, although to do so they must notify the Revenue Department separately from their application with the BOI. To qualify as an IBC at the Revenue Department, in addition to meeting the requirements of the BOI, the applicant must spend at least THB 60 million, in each accounting period, to recipients in Thailand, and have paid-up capital of THB 10 million at the end of each accounting period. The applicant must also comply with any other criteria, methods, and conditions stipulated by the Director-General of the Revenue Department in the future.

If an IBC meets these requirements, it will be entitled to the following tax privileges:

  • Reduced corporate income tax rate of 8%, 5%, or 3%, based on expenditures in Thailand of at least THB 60 million, THB 300 million, and THB 600 million, respectively;
  • Exemption from corporate income tax on dividends received from an affiliate;
  • Exemption from specific business tax for income received from treasury center functions;
  • Reduced personal income tax rate of 15% for expatriates working for an IBC; and
  • Exemption from withholding tax for offshore affiliates receiving dividends or interest paid from an IBC.

Impact on Existing IHQs and ITCs   

Companies currently promoted under the BOI’s IHQ and ITC schemes will not be affected, and they will continue to enjoy the incentives under the BOI investment certificate granted to them. Those who registered with the Revenue Department as Regional Operating Headquarters (ROH1 and ROH2), IHQs, or ITCs may opt to convert to IBCs if they are qualified and meet the conditions, or continue to enjoy the tax incentives laid out by the precedent notification or announcement until the end of the relevant timeframe.   

Overall, the new IBC may be less attractive than the precedent ROH, IHQ, and ITC frameworks as a result of the minimum expenditure requirements and other conditions. However, a foreign business license may still be a favorable option for companies that fail to meet the new requirements, and the benefit of harmonization between the Thai investment framework and the international community is likely to promote Thailand as a destination for international offices and domestic affiliates of international corporations. While the new framework may be inconvenient for some, the overall effect on Thailand as an FDI location will likely be beneficial.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
Read More
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
Read More
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
Read More
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.
Read More