You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 6, 2011

Beating Cosmetic Product Registration Hurdles

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

On January 1, 2008, Asean member countries implemented the Asean Harmonization Cosmetics Regulation Scheme in order to harmonize a previously chaotic process. A multitude of confusing laws and procedures has now been transformed into a streamlined system with just a single category for cosmetic products and an efficient registration process.

The Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented a new online cosmetic product registration system on November 1, 2010. Registration is now less time consuming and more environmentally friendly than under the previous paper-based system.

The FDA has also created a single product category, which forces some cosmetic companies to re-register their products. This is an important change from past practice, when there were three categories for cosmetic products.

According to the Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Thailand, the local cosmetic industry has been growing by 10 to 20 percent per year over the last ten years and is expected to see 30 percent growth in the domestic market in 2011. This domestic trend mirrors similar rapid growth in cosmetic imports.

Clearly, Thailand is becoming an extremely attractive place for cosmetic product distributors to do business. As the industry continues to expand, cosmetics distributors new to the market should be aware of possible hurdles that typically arise during the FDA product registration process. By preparing effectively, applicants will be able to save costs and bring their products to market quickly.

Product Name

Cosmetic products rely mainly on the name of the product to attract consumers. This has proven to be a very effective method for marketing the products, since this is the first element that consumers look at when electing to purchase a product.

Therefore, distributors need to take the utmost care when naming their products, prior to applying for product registration in Thailand. To avoid rejection by the FDA, each word in the product name must correctly reflect the objective of the product, and the words used must not mislead consumers.

One difficulty faced by companies is using product names that differ from the ingredients or the purpose of the product. For example, if the product name is “TRADENAME Tanning Body Lotion” but the product formula contains no ingredients that act as a tanning agent, this product will be declined registration by the FDA.

The manufacturer or importer must also exercise care in regard to the choice of a product name to avoid it being deemed an overclaim or use of homophonous words.

For example, a product used to combat wrinkles is called “TRADENAME Eraser Wrinkle Serum”. The word “eraser” will not be permitted for use in the product name because, in reality, the product cannot erase wrinkles. FDA officials would therefore deem the product name to be an overclaim.

Use of a homophonous word for a prohibited or improper word in a product name is also impermissible. An example of this is “Btox”, which is derived from the prohibited word “Botox”. “Btox” would be denied registration by the FDA because it is confusingly similar to the registered trademark BOTOX and is deemed an infringement.

Finally, scientific words such as “nano” are not recommended, as additional scientific or reliable supporting documents for those words must be submitted to the FDA to support the claimed correlation.

Formula

The use of a prohibited ingredient in a formula will definitely lead to a rejection by the FDA, and the manufacturer will be required to alter the product formula to secure FDA approval. Examples of prohibited ingredients commonly found in cosmetics are dimethylamine and diethylene glycol.

Some ingredients are authorized but restricted, and these ingredients are thus required to comply with special FDA rules. For example, a hair product formula for curling or straightening hair must not include tetraborates in an amount exceeding 8 percent, whereas a bath product formula must not exceed 18 percent (both are calculated in boric acid form).

A formula containing some specially controlled ingredients, especially natural extracts, must have a product safety document. For example, Citrus Reticulata Peel oil has no restrictions on the amount used in a formula. However, the total concentration of furocoumarin (found in this extract) in a finished cosmetic product must not exceed 1 ppm. Therefore, the company must certify the safety assessment of the product and provide an analysis of the amount of furocoumarin in the finished product.

FDA Cosmetic Category Codes

In the cosmetic registration process, an applicant is required to choose a cosmetic category code for each product from an FDA database known as the “Cosmetic Data Dictionary.”

For example, if the product is a facial makeup set consisting of compact face powder with foundation, sunscreen, and lip gloss, the cosmetic category code would be 12796. If this code is not clearly specified, the characteristics or product type may result in selection of the wrong cosmetic category code, which would lead to the application being rejected by the Examiner.

As the examples above illustrate, it is important that companies pay keen attention to the preparation of the registration of their product and advertising, as this will ensure a smooth and unhindered product launch.

 

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 11, 2026
Vietnam’s legal framework governing chemicals has undergone significant reform, with the Law on Chemicals No. 69/2025/QH15 (Law on Chemicals 2025) taking effect on January 1, 2026. Together with a comprehensive set of implementing instruments issued in January 2026, including three decrees (No. 24/2026/ND‑CP, No. 25/2026/ND‑CP, and No. 26/2026/ND‑CP) and two circulars (No. 01/2026/TT‑BCT and No. 02/2026/TT‑BCT), the Law on Chemicals 2025 has significantly reshaped chemical registration and management requirements. Determining What Constitutes a “New Chemical” Among the most notable changes introduced under the Law on Chemicals 2025 are the rules governing the registration and management of new chemicals, which must be registered with the authority before being placed on the Vietnam market. Although the concept of new chemical registration was first introduced under the Law on Chemicals 2007, the corresponding registration mechanism has remained largely dormant in practice. Under the Law on Chemicals 2025, a “new chemical” is defined as a substance that is not yet included in Vietnam’s National Chemical Inventory and the list of foreign chemical inventories recognized by the competent Vietnamese authority (List of Foreign Chemicals). On a literal reading, the definition in the new law may suggest that a substance qualifies as a new chemical only if it is absent from both lists. Accordingly, a chemical present in either list should be treated as an existing chemical without the registration burden. However, a different interpretation emerges from Decree 26, which specifically requires registration of “new chemicals” even where such substances already appear in the List of Foreign Chemicals. This implies that inclusion in a recognized foreign inventory does not automatically exempt a substance from new chemical registration in Vietnam. This inconsistency between the statutory definition in the Law on Chemicals 2025 and the implementing provisions of Decree 26 creates significant interpretative and compliance challenges. At
April 29, 2026
Effective June 22, 2026, Thai Industrial Standards (TIS) for food contact paper and cooking paper will be enforced as mandatory for sale in the Thai market. This move has important implications for product licensing and tightens hygiene, labeling, and chemical-safety requirements for food-contact and cooking paper products. Thailand is strengthening its regulatory framework for paper-based culinary materials against a backdrop of accelerating global commitments to ESG and sustainability, as such materials—particularly those derived from natural or recycled fibers—have emerged as key alternatives to plastics in food preparation, cooking, and packaging applications. As a result, regulators worldwide are tightening controls to ensure that sustainability initiatives do not compromise consumer safety, particularly regarding the potential migration of chemical substances into food. Regulatory Framework: Voluntary vs. Mandatory Standards Standards under the TIS regime are generally classified into two categories. Voluntary standards allow manufacturers or importers to apply for a product license and affix the TIS mark to demonstrate product quality and build consumer confidence, but compliance is not legally required. Mandatory standards, by contrast, require manufacturers and importers to obtain a product license and affix the TIS mark before placing products on the Thai market, and noncompliant products cannot be legally sold. Previously, the TIS standards for food contact paper (TIS 2948-2562) and cooking paper (TIS 3438-2022) fell under the voluntary standard regime, meaning that obtaining a TIS license and displaying the TIS mark was optional. However, due to the increasing use of paper in food preparation and cooking, the Thai Industrial Standards Institute has determined that upgrading these standards to mandatory status is necessary to enhance consumer safety. As a result, all paper intended for food contact or cooking purposes must now obtain a TIS product license prior to sale in Thailand. Scope of the Standards The primary distinction between the
April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
March 30, 2026
In response to an emerging crisis on food safety, the government of Vietnam promulgated Decree No. 46/2026/ND-CP (Decree 46) on January 26, 2026, and Resolution No. 66.13/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 66.13) on January 27, 2026, setting out a number of substantive changes to the procedure and strict requirements for the declaration, registration, and importation of food products. Both instruments took effect upon issuance. However, shortly after they entered into force, food businesses encountered significant implementation challenges, particularly with respect to state inspection procedures at the customs clearance stage for imported products. In response, the government issued Resolution No. 09/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 09) on February 4, 2026, temporarily suspending Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 until a new effective date of April 16, 2026. Continued Suspension of Implementation of Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 After considering feedback gathered by the Ministry of Health from food businesses and other stakeholders during the suspension period, the Vietnam Government Office issued a notice on March 20, 2026, agreeing to extend the suspension until the issuance of an amended Law on Food Safety and its guiding decree. Following this notice, on March 22, 2026, the Ministry of Health prepared a draft resolution to implement the notice and replace Resolution 09. Under the draft resolution, the effectiveness of Decree 46 and Resolution No. 66.13 would continue to be suspended until the amended Law on Food Safety takes effect, except for the provisions under Resolution 66.13 allowing flexibility in documents evidencing product efficacy, which would take effect on April 16, 2026, and remain effective until the Law on Food Safety is replaced (but not later than February 28, 2027). Accordingly, for products subject to the registration declaration procedure, such as health supplements, efficacy may be substantiated by either (i) scientific evidence supporting the declared function and effects of the product