You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 24, 2025

Bank of Thailand Implements New Responsible Lending Regulations

On January 31, 2025, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) announced a new Notification re: Responsible Lending, replacing a similar notification from 2023. This new notification provides updated measures to assist debtors in different circumstances and clear implementation guidelines for lenders, with the aim of resolving household debt issues.

Scope

The service providers covered by the notification include banks and nonbanks (e.g., credit card companies, asset management companies, licensed personal loan providers, and nano finance operators) that conduct lending business.

New Requirements

The notification’s core focus remains loan management throughout the lifecycle of a loan—from credit product development to legal proceedings and debt transfers to other creditors—but with further clarification and detail compared to the 2023 notification. The key revisions in the new notification are summarized below.

  • Advertising standards: The notification tightens requirements in some areas and relaxes them in others.
    • Stricter requirements: It is now clearly stipulated that the BOT oversees taglines that may encourage excessive borrowing. More examples of noncompliant statements are also added (e.g., “Elevate your lifestyle now, pay later”; “Get approved, even with credit challenges”). In addition, advertising material that contains multiple credit products should provide clear minimum and maximum interest rates, especially when there are significant differences in the interest rates of each product.
    • Relaxed requirements: The required information for some marketing activities is now reduced. For example, in marketing events with staff promoting loan products and offering free giveaways, service providers have the discretion to provide effective interest rate information in the manner they deem appropriate, and the advertisement material can display only the mandatory warning statements without providing interest rate details.
  • Encouraging customer financial discipline: The notification requires service providers to implement more elaborate and extensive tools to influence customer behavior (termed “nudging” by the BOT) at every stage of the lending cycle. This includes (1) increasing the nudging activities before loan application and during the repayment period to encourage customers to choose the appropriate loan repayment plan and a shorter lending period and to pay more than the minimum required payment per period, and (2) amending standard messages on persistent debt and debt restructuring measures to be easier to understand, mentioning conditions and the benefits of debt restructuring, and providing contact information.
  • Affordability assessments: The notification provides additional exemptions to the general affordability assessment criteria for (1) debt consolidation, refinancing, and additional loans under existing credit lines, whereby the existing or alternative repayment capability data of the customers (e.g., repayment history) can be used for the affordability assessment, and (2) debt with a family member as guarantor, whereby aggregate income of family members will be used for the affordability assessment.
  • Default management: The definition of “persistent debtors” (PDs)—which refers to personal loan debtors under the BOT’s supervision scheme, excluding title loans and digital payment loans—now includes those with over 90 days or three months of nonrepayment whose loans have minimum installment payment conditions, instead of non-NPL (nonperforming loan) debtors as stipulated in the 2023 notification. PDs will benefit from an extended repayment period of up to seven years for severe PD cases, without suspension of revolving credit. For debt restructuring, service providers must assist debtors at the account level rather than based on overall repayment ability. In this regard, the criteria for preemptive or troubled debt restructuring offerings have been amended to be better for debtors. Service providers must offer a preemptive debt restructuring option to debtors whose lapsed repayment is 90 days past due or less when signs of repayment difficulty appear, and a troubled debt restructuring option to debtors whose lapsed repayment is over 90 days past due, regardless of NPL status. Debt transfer, contract termination, and legal proceedings can only occur after offering the troubled debt restructuring option at least once.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 19, 2021
On September 9, 2021, Laos announced a new pilot program to allow the mining and trading of cryptocurrency. Notification No. 1158, issued by the Prime Minister’s Office, provides for an electricity sale-purchase agreement with six companies involved in the pilot program. Under the notification, the six companies authorized by the prime minister to mine and trade cryptocurrency in Laos will pay a capped fee for energy they use in data processing or mining cryptocurrency. This effectively establishes a sandbox in which these six companies may mine and trade cryptocurrency—including on international cryptocurrency exchanges. The Ministry of Technology and Communications (MTC) is in charge of coordinating the program, together with the Ministry of Finance, the Bank of the Lao PDR, the Ministry of Planning and Investment, the Ministry of Energy and Mines, the Ministry of Public Security, and Électricité du Laos. The MTC is also charged with drafting the rules of the pilot program and setting the conditions on which the participating companies can mine, sell, and purchase cryptocurrency in Laos. One of the six selected companies will also act as a coordinator for the other companies and report to the government on any benefits of cryptocurrency observed during the pilot program. The next step is for the MTC to compile data analysis from each of the other government agencies and submit the conclusions to a meeting of the prime minister and the deputy prime ministers before the pilot program is implemented. The pilot program was originally scheduled to start in September, but there has not yet been any update on the implementation of the program, which nonetheless is expected to start in the near future.
October 19, 2021
In September 2021, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) issued its Guidelines on Data Governance to provide financial institutions with recommendations on how to ensure that their data governance will be in compliance with accepted international principles. While there are no penalties for noncompliance, financial institutions should view the recommendations as minimum standard expectations for their data governance in Thailand. The BOT guidelines set forth five main data governance principles: Data Governance Policy Financial institutions should set forth their data governance policy in writing in accordance with their business size, business operations, business complexity, and data risk. The policy should cover all types of data, including data related to services from third parties or business partners, as well as provide information on the data governance structure, data lifecycle management, protection of data security and data privacy, and incident management. Financial institutions should inform their employees and other relevant parties of the policy to ensure their compliance. In addition, the data governance policy must be approved by the designated board or committee of the financial institution, and be reviewed and revised in response to significant changes. Data Governance Structure Financial institutions should establish a data governance structure with three lines of defense, supervised by an oversight committee. The first line of defense comprises data management personnel, a data approver, and data users; the second comprises a risk management unit and a compliance unit; and the third is an audit unit. While the chosen data governance structure can be tailored to the characteristics of the institution, the structure should cover all of these roles and duties, and must not contravene the principle of checks and balances. The data governance structure should also be supported by sufficient personnel and equipment, as well as a clear plan—reviewed and revised as necessary—for building awareness at