You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 23, 2024

Bank of Thailand Implements New Responsible Lending Regulation

Subscribe to Updates

The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has issued a new notification to sustainably address Thailand’s household debt problems by establishing responsible and fair lending requirements for lending service providers throughout their lending journey.

Notification No. SorKorChor. 7/2566 Re: Provision of Responsible and Fair Lending was announced on December 21, 2023, and took effect on January 1, 2024. The lending service providers this notification applies to include both commercial banks and nonbank business operators (e.g., personal loan business operators, nano-financing business operators, and credit card business operators).

The key principle of this notification is to provide criteria for responsible and fair lending that supplement market conduct principles, covering eight areas in the debt cycle:

  • Lending product development. Service providers must offer lending products that are suitable to customers’ needs and repayment capabilities, avoiding encouragement of excessive debt. Loan interest rates should align with the borrower’s risk profile and credit characteristics (risk-based pricing) to ensure fair contract conditions.
  • Advertising. Service providers must prepare and control advertisements with “correct and clear” content, presenting complete and comparable conditions, interest rates, and various fees to customers. The advertisements should not encourage excessive debt, enabling customers to make informed decisions and promoting financial discipline.
  • Sales. In the selling process, service providers must ensure that customers receive complete, accurate, and unexaggerated information that facilitates appropriate consideration of decisions based on a correct understanding of the product or service. Products should also align with customers’ purposes or needs for fund utilization, avoiding encouragement of excessive debt.
  • Consideration of debt repayment ability (affordability). Service providers must be conscientious in considering customers’ debt repayment ability, taking into account all obligations and residual income.
  • Promotion of discipline and financial management. Service providers must provide important information and warnings to debtors, including regular reminders to promote responsible borrowing.
  • Helping debtors with persistent debt. Service providers must convey essential information to make debtors aware of the negative effects of persistent debt. This includes establishing standard guidelines for helping debtors find an appropriate way to settle their debts.
  • Helping debtors with debt repayment issues. Service providers must promptly propose debt restructuring guidelines in line with debtors’ ability to repay as soon as debtors begin to show signs of repayment problems.
  • Legal proceedings and debt sales to other creditors. Upon request, service providers must inform debtors of their rights and important information when legal action has been taken. Additionally, debtors should be afforded an opportunity to engage in mediation regarding their debt problems. This includes providing appropriate debt repayment conditions after debt has been sold and transferred.

For more information on this BOT notification, or on any aspect of conducting financial or lending business in Thailand, please contact Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh at [email protected], Pornpan Wichawut at [email protected], or Karnravee Jitvilai at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 20, 2025
Thailand’s official draft Platform Economy Act (PEA) was released on January 15, 2025, for public comment until February 15, 2025. The draft PEA is positioned as a general or overarching law for digital intermediary services and digital platform service businesses. The official release of the draft came after the sharing of the set of principles that would form the basis for the official draft PEA in November 2024. The draft PEA incorporates those principles and adds more detailed provisions. Especially notable is that the draft PEA requires all intermediary service providers and online platform operators—both Thai and foreign—to appoint a point of contact to liaise with the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) if they have any users in Thailand. However, the draft PEA does not mandate establishment of a local entity in Thailand. Types of Intermediary Services The draft PEA sets out a three-tiered classification system for different types of service providers, ordered from fewest obligations to most: Intermediary services. Intermediary services are further divided into three subcategories: mere conduit, caching, and hosting. Each type of intermediary service has different safe harbor provisions, which define their scope and limitations. Online platform services. Online platform services are defined as involving “the provision of intermediary services in the hosting category that involve facilitating the matching of various types of users to enable transactions or interactions, whether or not a fee is charged. Additionally, such services may include other provisions to facilitate these transactions or interactions.” Key obligations for online platform providers include: Informing users of their rights and duties under relevant laws Implementing a notice-and-action mechanism Disclosing advertising information Publishing T&Cs, including details such as service fees, algorithms, and complaint management mechanisms. Very large online platform services. Very large online platform services (VLOPs) have extra duties beyond regular online platform services,
Read More
January 13, 2025
The State Bank of Vietnam’s Circular No. 50/2024/TT-NHNN regulating safety and security for the provision of online services in the banking sector (“Circular 50”), issued on October 31, 2024, took effect on January 1, 2025, with delayed effectiveness for certain provisions on (i) network, communication, and security systems, online banking application software, and mobile banking application software (July 1, 2025); (ii) transaction confirmation for payment transactions conducted via the straight-through processing method (January 1, 2026); and (iii) authentication forms and reporting obligations (July 1, 2026). The cybersecurity situation in Vietnam is complicated, and the banking and finance sector has been one of the top targets of high-tech criminals. Circular 50 seeks to enhance user protection by expanding the technical requirements to more services in the banking sector as well as standardizing how transactions are authenticated. Expanded Scope of Services Covered Previous regulations on safety and security of online services in the banking sector only covered banking services and intermediary payment services. Circular 50 expands the scope to include other services of credit institutions and foreign bank branches such as credit information services, foreign exchange services, securities depository services, and services related to factoring and letters of credit, which now need to comply with technical requirements and standards for online services such as firewalls and DMZ network barriers. Risk-Based Approach to Authentication Circular 50 sets out standards for payment transactions and card transactions by: Classifying various online transactions based on the type of client, the purpose of the transfer, the value of the specific transaction, and the total value of certain transactions during the day; and Applying various types of authentication for the corresponding types of online transactions, e.g., using passwords or PINs for small-value online transactions, and using OTPs (through SMS, voice, or email), biometric matching, or e-signatures for
Read More
January 9, 2025
Thailand’s Fiscal Policy Office (FPO) has released a draft of its planned Financial Business Hub Act, which is in line with the government’s aim of positioning Thailand as a regional financial hub and a critical player in the global economy. The draft act, on which the FPO is accepting comments until January 9, 2025, details the framework for promoting and attracting international financial businesses and related services to operate in Thailand, proposes various incentives, and outlines supervisory guidelines. This article examines key elements of the draft Financial Business Hub Act relevant to financial business operators. Incentivized Financial Businesses The draft act identifies the financial businesses to be promoted and incentivized. These target businesses include: Commercial banking businesses, Payment service businesses, Securities businesses, Derivatives businesses, Digital assets businesses, Insurance and reinsurance brokerage businesses, and Other financial-related businesses as determined by the Committee for the Supervision and Promotion of Financial Centers. Thailand’s finance minister explained that initially, the draft law intends to target businesses using an “out-out” model, which describes the raising of capital abroad for investment abroad, before expanding to an “out-in” model, in which capital is raised abroad for investment domestically. Therefore, the draft law currently specifies that the target businesses must only provide services to nonresidents without soliciting residents of Thailand to use their services. Authorization Targeted financial business operators will need to receive authorization from the Committee for the Supervision and Promotion of Financial Centers. The main eligibility criteria for authorization are the incorporation an entity (e.g., a company registered in Thailand, a branch of a foreign juristic person) with an office in designated areas to be specified in a royal decree (currently expected to be Bangkok and adjacent provinces) and the possession of other qualifications as prescribed in the draft act. Target businesses in Thailand will
Read More
November 14, 2024
In recent years, Thailand has taken significant steps to regulate and integrate digital assets into its financial ecosystem. This article explores the regulatory framework governing digital asset businesses in Thailand, focusing on the key legislation, regulated activities, and recent developments in this rapidly evolving sector. Regulatory Environment In 2018, Thailand enacted the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses, marking a pivotal moment in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies and digital tokens. This decree, supervised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Ministry of Finance, provides a comprehensive regulatory framework for both the primary and secondary markets of digital assets. For the primary market, the decree regulates the issuance and sale of digital assets through initial coin offerings (ICOs). A key feature of this regulation is the requirement for ICOs to be conducted through SEC-approved ICO portals. This approach aims to provide a structured and supervised environment for companies seeking to raise funds through digital token sales. In the secondary market, the decree outlines the regulatory framework for various digital asset intermediaries, including digital asset exchanges, brokers, dealers, advisory services, fund managers, and custodians. In implementing its digital asset-related policies, the SEC imposes ongoing obligations on licensed digital asset intermediaries. These include restrictions on the listing of certain digital assets on digital asset exchanges, and limitations on intermediaries facilitating digital assets as a means of payment. Regulatory Trends and Outlook The SEC has demonstrated a commitment to regularly revising its digital asset regulations to keep pace with global trends and market developments. A notable example of this approach is the SEC’s efforts to refine the classification of nonregulated ready-to-use utility tokens by dividing these tokens into two groups: Group 1: Ready-to-use utility tokens issued for consumption purposes or as a digital representation of a certificate (e.g., NFTs with
Read More