You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 2, 2018

Asia IP Quotes Alec Wheatley on Current Standing of the RCEP

Subscribe to Updates
Asia IP

Asia IP’s August 2018 edition takes an in-depth look at the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), focusing on where it stands now and its projected trajectory. The feature article, “Mission: Impossible – The RCEP Ghost Protocol,” includes extensive insights from Alec Wheatley, a consultant in the Tilleke & Gibbins intellectual property team in Bangkok.

In discussing the expansive scope of the RCEP—which includes the ten member countries of ASEAN and six of their major trading partners (Australia, China, India, New Zealand, and South Korea)—Alec is quoted as saying “The economies of [China and India] are projected to grow considerably over the coming decades, meaning that any Free Trade Area that includes them is likely to have a strong effect on global trade.” Drawing from this perspective, if the RCEP comes into effect, it would appear to be poised to have a major influence on international trade.

However, there may be limits to the RCEP’s potential. “The closed-door nature of the RCEP negotiations means that what is known about the IP provisions of the RCEP is limited to leaked text, and so while there are several important distinctions that may be drawn between the RCEP and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), any analysis may be subject to change once the agreement is finalized,” Alec said.

The article also cites Alec’s comments on some major differences between the RCEP and the TPP, specifically noting the following:

  • Copyright Term. The RCEP maintains the Berne Convention minimum requirement to protect copyright for the life of the author plus 50 years, while the TPP pushes to extend the term to the life of the author plus 70 years.
  • Internet Service Provider (ISP) Liability. The RCEP has similar ISP liability provisions to the TPP but is much simpler and more flexible in regard to implementation.
  • Digital Rights Management. The RCEP differs from the TPP in that it does not prevent circumvention of Digital Rights Management if permitted by a member country’s laws.
  • Broadcasters’ Rights. The RCEP provides potential new avenues for broadcasters to prevent retransmission of their content.
  • Differential Treatment. Unlike the TPP, the RCEP recognizes that less-developed countries may require less rigorous standards, which is an important acknowledgement given the different levels of development of the countries involved.

To read the full publication, please visit the Asia IP website (subscription required).

RELATED PROFESSIONAL

Practices

Intellectual Property

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 7, 2021
Chandavya Ing, an associate in the intellectual property group of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, coauthored an article titled “The Fate of Dependent Patents in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam—A Comparison with the Situation in Germany and India” with Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar, a patent attorney and partner in the Munich office of Boehmer & Boehmer. The article appeared in the September 2021 issue of les Nouvelles, the journal of the Licensing Executives Society International (LESI). Dependent patents are new patents that also rely on a previous one, such as when an invention builds on or adds new technology to a previous patented invention. This approach to securing commercial rights for progressive inventions is often seen in patent-heavy fields such as telecommunications and advanced technology. Commercializing a dependent patent without infringing the earlier patent (i.e., the one that it depends on) requires licensing from the holder of the earlier patent. If this proves unworkable, the dependent patent cannot go to market. While this may ensure that the original patent rights are upheld, such an impasse can also block innovation and progress. As the authors explain in the article, Germany and India (as well as other countries such as Russia and Taiwan) will enlist a state party in an effort to resolve any such situation that arises, often through a de-blocking mechanism such as a compulsory or non-voluntary license. The article then looks in detail at the de-blocking mechanisms and provisions in the legal and regulatory environment of various countries in Southeast Asia, before offering comparison to the situation in Germany and India. Overall, the authors conclude that a more active (but balanced) use of compulsory licensing—which already exists in many Southeast Asian countries but is not frequently employed outside of the pharmaceutical sector—might help clear patent-related obstacles
Read More
August 30, 2021
On August 27, Darani Vachanavuttivong, co-managing partner of Tilleke & Gibbins and managing director of the firm’s intellectual property group, moderated an International Trademark Association (INTA) Flash Briefing titled “IP Developments in the ASEAN Region.” The briefing was organized to provide analysis of the ASEAN IPR Action Plan 2016–2025, which aims to harness IP to support the regional grouping’s drive to be an innovative and competitive location for business. As moderator, Darani welcomed attendees and presented both an overview of economic trends in ASEAN and detailed statistical insights on trademarks, patents, designs, and utility models in member countries. She then welcomed the assistant director of the Consumer Protection and IPR Division in the Market Integration Directorate of the ASEAN Secretariat to share insights on the action plan—and the more recent ASEAN IPR Action Plan 2.0, which was developed after the mid-term review. A new initiative that just began in early 2021, INTA Flash Briefings are interactive conversations with IP experts and brand owners on emerging policy changes affecting trademarks and related rights across the globe.
Read More
August 20, 2021
On August 19, Sher Hann Chua, a consultant in Tilleke & Gibbins’ Bangkok and Yangon offices, presented a session to the Thailand chapter of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) titled “An Overview of Intellectual Property: What to Focus on in the Contract and the Field.” Moderated by Joseph Tomkiewicz, partner and co-chair of Tilleke & Gibbins’ regional energy practice, the session focused on the intellectual property (IP) rights and issues that are most relevant to the oil and gas industry. In discussing IP rights and how they function in the energy sector, Sher Hann presented an overview of trademarks, patents, industrial designs, and copyright, before emphasizing the crucial role that IP plays in major commercial transactions such as mergers and acquisitions. She also analyzed classic IP pitfalls that parties makes when working with others under a contractual arrangement, and providing practical tips on how to avoid these missteps.
Read More
July 16, 2021
Eric Meyer, a foreign consultant in Tilleke & Gibbins’ dispute resolution department, was profiled in the latest issue of Thai-American Business (T-AB), the quarterly magazine of the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand (AMCHAM). As co-chair of the AMCHAM Legal Committee, Eric is extremely active in the American business community in Thailand. He applies his unique combination of legal expertise and practical awareness of business concerns in Thailand to identify topics and organize events that are interesting and relevant to a broad range of people. In the T-AB profile, Eric recounts how he came to be involved in AMCHAM after joining Tilleke & Gibbins four years ago, and notes that participation in the group has been an excellent way to stay current with the business community and build connections with professionals across various industries. In response to a question on the outlook for ease of doing business in Thailand, Eric sounded a hopeful note, explaining that the country’s strides in the areas of streamlining and digitizing various aspects of doing business should be able to continue after COVID-19, which has actually hastened digitization in several legal areas that had previously been slower to adapt to recent technological advances. Eric now looks forward to continuing to provide important leadership to the AMCHAM Legal Committee as the country and its business community seek to overcome the persistent challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and move toward a sustainable economic recovery.
Read More