You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 2, 2018

Asia IP Quotes Alec Wheatley on Current Standing of the RCEP

Subscribe to Updates
Asia IP

Asia IP’s August 2018 edition takes an in-depth look at the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), focusing on where it stands now and its projected trajectory. The feature article, “Mission: Impossible – The RCEP Ghost Protocol,” includes extensive insights from Alec Wheatley, a consultant in the Tilleke & Gibbins intellectual property team in Bangkok.

In discussing the expansive scope of the RCEP—which includes the ten member countries of ASEAN and six of their major trading partners (Australia, China, India, New Zealand, and South Korea)—Alec is quoted as saying “The economies of [China and India] are projected to grow considerably over the coming decades, meaning that any Free Trade Area that includes them is likely to have a strong effect on global trade.” Drawing from this perspective, if the RCEP comes into effect, it would appear to be poised to have a major influence on international trade.

However, there may be limits to the RCEP’s potential. “The closed-door nature of the RCEP negotiations means that what is known about the IP provisions of the RCEP is limited to leaked text, and so while there are several important distinctions that may be drawn between the RCEP and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), any analysis may be subject to change once the agreement is finalized,” Alec said.

The article also cites Alec’s comments on some major differences between the RCEP and the TPP, specifically noting the following:

  • Copyright Term. The RCEP maintains the Berne Convention minimum requirement to protect copyright for the life of the author plus 50 years, while the TPP pushes to extend the term to the life of the author plus 70 years.
  • Internet Service Provider (ISP) Liability. The RCEP has similar ISP liability provisions to the TPP but is much simpler and more flexible in regard to implementation.
  • Digital Rights Management. The RCEP differs from the TPP in that it does not prevent circumvention of Digital Rights Management if permitted by a member country’s laws.
  • Broadcasters’ Rights. The RCEP provides potential new avenues for broadcasters to prevent retransmission of their content.
  • Differential Treatment. Unlike the TPP, the RCEP recognizes that less-developed countries may require less rigorous standards, which is an important acknowledgement given the different levels of development of the countries involved.

To read the full publication, please visit the Asia IP website (subscription required).

RELATED PROFESSIONAL

Practices

Intellectual Property

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 27, 2021
On October 26, Tilleke & Gibbins collaborated with CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office in China to organize a Chinese-language webinar titled “Practical Trademark Strategies for Chinese Investors in Thailand.” Presenting in Chinese, Sher Hann Chua, a consultant in the firm’s Bangkok and Yangon offices, covered the following topics in Chinese to equip Chinese investors and brand owners to gain better understanding of relevant Thai regulations: Trademark registration procedures, examination criteria and application strategies; Trademark enforcement framework; and Trademark licensing and brand commercialization strategies.
Read More
October 14, 2021
On October 13, Alan Adcock, partner and deputy director of the firm’s intellectual property and regulatory affairs groups in Bangkok, and Thomas J. Treutler, managing director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ offices in Vietnam, represented the firm in the virtual IP Life Sciences Conference 2021. Life sciences specialists from around the world attended the conference, which was organized to provide patent owners in the life sciences industry with pertinent information and updates relating to patent disputes and litigation in key jurisdictions. During their presentations on local Thai and Vietnamese legal regulations, Alan and Thomas offered insights on policies and risks relating to injunctions in patent disputes, the most successful patent litigation strategies in each respective country, and the cost of litigation versus the practical business benefits of patent protection.
Read More
October 11, 2021
On Thursday, October 21, 2021, two attorneys from the intellectual property department in Tilleke & Gibbins’ Bangkok office will present a Thai-language webinar on the importance of trademarks for garment manufacturers. Ploynapa Julagasigorn, senior associate, and Waralee Sripawadkul, associate, will team up to address trademark registration in Thailand and abroad. In the first part of the webinar, Ploynapa will cover trademark registration in Thailand, focusing especially on the importance of trademark registration, legal rights, distinctive qualities of successful trademarks, procedures, registration duration, and enforcement.  She will also outline procedures in civil trials, criminal trials, and alternative dispute resolution. Waralee will then present on trademark registration in other countries. She will explain the importance of a trademark validation outside of Thailand, discuss application requirements, advise on how to properly prepare an application, and share practical advice on issues that brand owners should be aware of. This webinar, which is organized in conjunction with the Thai Garment Manufacturers Association (TGMA), will provide brand owners with a clear understanding of how to acquire trademark protection in order to fully protect their intellectual property in Thailand and internationally. Attendance is free for TGMA members and THB 700 for nonmembers. To attend, please complete the webinar registration form.
Read More
September 17, 2021
On September 16, 2021, the Thailand Recognized Group of the Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA) elected councilors and standing committee members for the new term, and six attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins across nearly all IP practices won places on APAA Thailand’s various committees and executive bodies: Darani Vachanavuttivong – APAA Thailand Council Wiramrudee (Pink) Mokkhavesa – Anti-counterfeiting Committee Sukontip Jitmongkolthong – Copyright Committee Napagate Ratana – Design Committee Suebsiri Taweepon – Emerging IP Rights Committee Peeyakorn Suparugbundit – Patent Committee The APAA advocates for intellectual property protection throughout Asia by fostering connections among IP professionals and organizations, cooperating with other organizations in the region, and arranging activities for members to promote understanding of IP laws in Asia. For more information on the APAA, please see the APAA website.
Read More