You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 27, 2018

Anti-Corruption Law under Vietnam’s New Penal Code

Informed Counsel

Vietnam’s new Penal Code (the “New Penal Code”), which became effective on January 1, 2018, significantly bolsters Vietnam’s anti-corruption laws with respect to the private sector. The New Penal Code sets out numerous corruption-related offenses, including the giving and promising of bribes, the receiving of bribes, the “brokerage” of bribes, and embezzlement. The most significant corruption-related change in the new law involves the criminalization of private-sector bribery. Individuals working for corporations, charities, and other nongovernmental organizations can now be criminally liable for bribery offenses even when they do not involve government officials.

The New Penal Code also introduces corporate criminal liability for a variety of crimes. Importantly, however, corporate criminal liability does not extend to corruption in the new law. For both private-sector and public-sector corruption offenses, only individuals can be punished. With that in mind, the law does provide corporate criminal liability for certain corruption-related offenses, such as money laundering, tax evasion, and terrorism financing. 

Public- and Private-Sector Corruption

The underlying concept stated in the law that defines corrupt activities is “abuse of power.” Public office-holders—as well as private ones—are liable for offenses relating to abuses of power under the law. The term “office-holders” is broadly defined as people who are granted duties and authority “through appointment, election, contract conclusion, or another method.” The law also states that office-holders “might or might not receive salaries.” This seemingly covers anyone who has some measure of authority within an organization, even if they are unpaid. Private-sector organizations that fall under the law would therefore not only include corporations or for-profit enterprises, but also charities, volunteer groups, and other NGOs. 

Giving and Promising Bribes

The New Penal Code criminalizes the giving and promising of bribes to any office-holder, person, or organization, whether public or private. The bribery may be committed directly or through an intermediary. The penalty for giving or promising to give a bribe largely depends on the value of the benefit given or promised. The minimum value of tangible benefits to trigger a violation of the law is VND 2 million (about USD 88). Penalties range from relatively low fines of VND 20 million (about USD 880) and six months’ imprisonment to 20 years’ imprisonment. There is no death penalty or life sentence for giving bribes. Interestingly, the law introduces a prohibition on bribery involving foreign government officials and officials with public international organizations. This is relevant as Vietnam is a significant recipient of official development assistance from other countries, as well as loans from multilateral development banks and financial institutions.

The New Penal Code does not prescribe corporate criminal liability for giving bribes. As such, the law does not provide for any internal compliance-related measures that may mitigate liability. However, the law does state that any person who voluntarily reports giving a bribe before being discovered might be exempt from criminal liability, and have all or part of the bribe money/property returned. Furthermore, if someone is “forced” to give a bribe, but voluntarily reports the bribe before being discovered, that person may be acquitted and have the bribe money returned. This situation could apply to an employee acting under a manager’s orders. The law, though, is ambiguous in this regard.

Receiving Bribes

Under the New Penal Code, government officials as well as individuals in the private sector are criminally liable for taking bribes. An offense is committed regardless of whether the bribe is received directly or via an intermediary. Penalties range from a minimum of two years’ imprisonment, to life imprisonment and death. The penalty depends on the value of the bribe received. Similar to giving bribes, the law contains a VND 2 million minimum threshold at which receiving a bribe violates the statute.

Brokering Bribery

The New Penal Code criminalizes the act of “brokering” bribery. This provision in the law applies directly to the private sector. “Brokering bribery” means bribery by an intermediary (though the law does not expressly define the term). In other words, an intermediary between a bribe giver and bribe taker is criminally liable under the law, independent from the main transacting parties. If the bribery broker voluntarily reports the bribe before the crime is discovered, the broker may be exempt from criminal responsibility.

Embezzlement

The New Penal Code characterizes embezzlement as a corruption-related offense. Under the law, the crime of embezzlement occurs when a person abuses his/her power to embezzle property under that person’s management. Similar to other corruption offenses, an act of embezzlement crosses the criminal threshold when it involves a minimum amount of VND 2 million. The severity of the penalty depends on the amount appropriated and additional factors, such as the number of times the offense was committed, the seriousness of the offense’s impact on the organization, and others. The minimum penalty is two to seven years’ imprisonment; the maximum is the death penalty.

Deterrent for Wrongful Conduct

The New Penal Code’s introduction of criminal liability for private-sector corruption should benefit investors doing business in Vietnam. The law will hopefully serve as a deterrent for those employees and managers who may be tempted to seek kickbacks, give and take bribes, abuse their positions to embezzle funds, or otherwise engage in wrongful conduct. The New Penal Code also helps organizations carry out internal investigations of wrongdoing. Employees who face the real possibility of criminal sanction may be compelled to cooperate and disclose the full extent of any wrongdoing in the hope of avoiding prosecution.

It is recommended that organizations in Vietnam should educate their employees on the new law as part of their overall internal anti-corruption training and compliance efforts. Organizations should also pay attention to any future implementing regulations that may further clarify corruption-related aspects of the New Penal Code. 

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2025
Thailand has proposed amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) as the country steps up its efforts to combat economic crimes and corruption. One of the primary objectives of the amendments is to enhance the effectiveness of measures curbing the use of nominees to help foreign nationals operate restricted or prohibited businesses in violation of the law. If these proposed updates are implemented, they will substantially strengthen existing legislation related to the use of nominees and bribing government officials, including officials of foreign governments and international organizations. These offenses would be treated as predicate violations under the amended legislation. The draft amendments are currently open for a public comment period, which is set to conclude on April 25, 2025. Highlights of the proposed amendments are detailed below. Predicate Offenses The draft amendments propose adding the concept of a “predicate offense” covering the following: Bribery: Giving, offering, or promising to give assets or benefits to Thai or foreign public officials, or officials of international organizations. Acting as a nominee: Assisting, supporting, or engaging in the business operations of a foreign national who is not permitted to operate that business; jointly operating a business with a foreign national under the guise that it is solely owned by the Thai national; or holding shares on behalf of a foreign national in a partnership, limited company, or any other legal entity to help the foreign national conduct business without the permits required under the Foreign Business Act. Under the draft amendments, Thai individuals or juristic persons who have agreed to take any of these actions, as well as foreign nationals who allow such assistance in their business operations, will be liable for committing a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The draft proposes a prescription period of 15 years from
April 3, 2025
On February 26, 2025, Thailand’s National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) issued a notification titled “Criteria for Individuals Living Together as Husband and Wife that Are Considered as De Facto Spouses (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (2025).” This new notification, published in the Government Gazette on March 7, 2025, took effect retroactively from January 22, 2025. Prior to this notification, the term “spouses” specifically included “individuals living together as husband and wife” without registering marriage, referring to similar language at the time in Thailand’s Civil and Commercial Code. However, it was unclear whether this term included same-sex and other nontraditional couples. After the Marriage Equality Act revised this language in the Civil and Commercial Code to only refer to “spouses” (with a gender-neutral Thai word), the NACC took the opportunity to issue a new notification that simply replaces any mention of “husband and wife” with “spouses,” thereby removing the ambiguity. As a result, this new notification covers same-sex de facto spouses of politicians and high-ranking officials. These spouses’ assets must now be declared together with the officials’ assets. Additionally, same-sex de facto spouses of state officials are prohibited from engaging in business with the Thai government that may present conflicts of interest. Importantly, the notification also impacts the interpretation of the Office of the Prime Minister’s (OPM) Regulation on the Giving or Receiving of Gifts by Public Officials B.E. 2565 (2022). In this regard, same-sex de facto spouses of government officials are now also prohibited from accepting gifts or other benefits related to official duties. This is because the OPM regulation references the NACC definitions when defining “family members” to include “de facto husband and wife.” Under the OPM regulation, public officials and their supervisors are strictly prohibited from permitting or condoning family members’ acceptance of gifts or other benefits related to
February 12, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins’ anticorruption team in Bangkok has authored the Thailand chapter of the newly released Anti-Bribery & Corruption 2026, published by Lexology Panoramic. This global guide provides a comparative overview of antibribery and anticorruption regimes across multiple jurisdictions. The Thailand chapter addresses the following key areas: Relevant international and domestic law: International anticorruption conventions, foreign and domestic bribery laws, successor liability, civil and criminal enforcement, out-of-court resolution and leniency mechanisms Foreign bribery: Legal framework, definition of foreign public officials, gifts, travel and entertainment, facilitating payments, payments through intermediaries, individual and corporate liability, private commercial bribery, defenses, enforcement authorities, enforcement trends, prosecution of foreign companies, sanctions, recent decisions and investigations Financial record-keeping and reporting: Applicable laws and regulations, disclosure of violations or irregularities, prosecution under accounting legislation, penalties for record-keeping violations, and tax deductibility of domestic or foreign bribes Domestic bribery: Legal framework, scope of prohibitions, definition of domestic public officials, gifts, travel and entertainment, facilitating payments, public official participation in commercial activities, payments through intermediaries or third parties, individual and corporate liability, private commercial bribery, defenses, enforcement authorities, enforcement trends, prosecution of foreign companies, sanctions, recent decisions and investigations Updates and trends: Key developments over the past year The Thailand chapter outlines recent developments in anticorruption enforcement, including significant cases involving multinational corporations and continued operations targeting transnational fraud networks along the Myanmar border. It also provides an overview of Thailand’s legal framework for addressing domestic and foreign bribery, including the Organic Act on Anti-Corruption B.E. 2561 (2017). The full Thailand chapter is available as a PDF through the button below. Readers may also register for 30 days of complimentary access to the complete Anti-Bribery & Corruption 2026 guide and other Lexology Panoramic publications through this link.
January 30, 2025
The Thai cabinet has approved a draft amendment of the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes as proposed by the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to strengthen measures against technological crimes, particularly targeting call center scams and cyber fraud. Following the Council of State’s review, the emergency decree will be become effective immediately upon its enactment and publication in the Government Gazette. While the draft amendment is not yet publicly available, the government recently indicated that the emergency decree aims to empower authorities with decisive measures to combat cybercrime effectively. It underscores the shared responsibility among various sectors, including banking, telecommunications, and online platforms, in safeguarding against technological crimes. Key provisions of the draft amendment of the emergency decree include: Telecommunications provider obligations: Telecommunications service providers must suspend SIM cards associated with criminal activities. The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission and mobile service providers themselves are authorized to temporarily suspend mobile phone numbers if there is reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activities. Banking responsibilities: Financial institutions are required to promptly report mule accounts to the Anti-Money Laundering Office to facilitate quick restitution to victims. The Anti-Money Laundering Transaction Committee is empowered to order the return of funds to victims without requiring a final court ruling. Penalties for noncompliance: The amended emergency decree introduces penalties for noncompliance by regulated entities that fail to prevent criminal activities for offenses related to technology crimes in the following cases: Digital asset services: Those engaged in the buying, selling, or exchanging of digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies and digital tokens, as well as digital asset businesses that launder money obtained from online crimes by converting it into digital currency, will be subject to imprisonment for up to one year, a fine of up to THB 100,000,