You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 11, 2020

Amendments Proposed to Vietnam’s Law on Investment and Law on Enterprises

Subscribe to Updates

Amended versions of Vietnam’s 2014 Law on Investment and 2014 Law on Enterprises, two of the key laws governing companies (including foreign companies) doing business in Vietnam, will be considered at the 9th session of the National Assembly in May 2020. If passed, the draft laws will come into effect on January 1, 2021.

The amended laws are currently in the proposal stage. The Ministry of Planning and Investment recently submitted drafts, as verified by the Economic Committee of the National Assembly, to the Standing Committee of the National Assembly for its opinions.

Proposed Amendments to the Law on Investment

According to Notice No. 3530/TB-TTKQH of the Secretary General of the National Assembly of Vietnam dated March 30, 2020, the Standing Committee, at its 43rd session, concluded the following points on proposed amendments to the Law on Investment:

List of Conditional Business Lines

One of the proposed amendments to the Law on Investment is an update of the list of conditional business lines. Specifically, 12 business lines will be removed (including commercial arbitration, franchising, and logistics services), 19 business lines will be amended, and six new business lines will be introduced: architectural services, data center services, electronic identification and authentication services, import press distribution services, fishing vessel registry, and training crew members of fishing ships. The Standing Committee recommended further review to assess the possible impact of these changes.

Debt Collection Services

There are still two streams of opinion with respect to debt collection services. Some argue that the provision of such services should be prohibited, while others support the notion that debt collection services are still necessary, but strict conditions/requirements for provision of such services must be established. The Standing Committee agreed to submit both opinions to seek further opinions from the National Assembly.

Proposed Amendments to the Law on Enterprises

On March 10, 2020, the Economic Committee issued Report No. 1850/BC-UBKT14 to report to the Standing Committee some key proposed amendments to the Law on Enterprises. The Standing Committee offered no further comments on these amendments.

Corporate Seals

Under proposed amendments to reduce unnecessary administrative procedures and costs relating to corporate seals, companies would have the right to decide whether to have a seal or not, and would no longer be obliged to notify the relevant licensing authority of their seal samples. Instead, the seal samples could be published on company websites, or electronic signatures could be used.

Protection of Minority Shareholders

Under the current Law on Enterprises, a shareholder or a group of shareholders holding at least 10% (or a smaller percentage as stipulated in the charter of the company) of the total ordinary shares has the right, among others, to request the convening of a General Meeting of Shareholders in some specific cases and ask the Board of Inspection to investigate issues relating to the management and administration of the company. A proposed amendment would reduce this percentage to 5%, to enhance protection of the minority shareholders’ rights.

Private Placement of Bonds by Non-Public Companies

A proposed amendment would add new regulations on conditions and procedures for private placement of bonds by non-public companies. Under these regulations, non-public companies would only be allowed to offer corporate bonds to professional securities investors, such as commercial banks and securities investment funds.

***

Should you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to us at [email protected] for further assistance.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 5, 2026
Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 dated June 27, 2025, of the National Assembly of Vietnam (the “IFC Resolution” – see our previous article) set out the foundational legal framework for the establishment and development of Vietnam’s first-ever International Financial Centers (IFC). In furtherance of this framework, on December 18, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued eight implementing decrees to provide detailed regulatory guidance and to operationalize the IFC Resolution in practice. The Eight Implementing Decrees: An Integrated Regulatory Ecosystem The new decrees governing the IFC include the following: Decree No. 323/2025/ND-CP on the establishment of the IFC. Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP on financial policies applicable within the IFC. Decree No. 325/2025/ND-CP on labor, employment, and social security within the IFC. Decree No. 326/2025/ND-CP on land and environmental matters within the IFC. Decree No. 327/2025/ND-CP on entry, exit, and residence of foreign nationals in the IFC. Decree No. 328/2025/ND-CP on the International Arbitration Center of the IFC. Decree No. 329/2025/ND-CP on banking licensing, foreign exchange management, and anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) within the IFC. Decree No. 330/2025/ND-CP on the establishment and operation of commodity exchanges within the IFC. Taken as a whole, these eight decrees translate the IFC Resolution into a coherent and fully operational legal regime governing the establishment, organization, and functioning of Vietnam’s IFC. Collectively, they demonstrate that Vietnam’s IFC framework is best understood not as a collection of isolated incentives, but as a deliberately designed and integrated regulatory system. The Legal Architecture of the IFC: Four Interlocking Pillars Read together, the decrees seem to be designed to address four core regulatory questions from the outset: (i) what the IFC is, from a legal and institutional perspective; (ii) who may participate in the IFC and what activities are permitted; (iii) how people, capital, and projects operate
Read More
December 30, 2025
On December 17, 2025, Laos’ Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MOIC) issued a notice introducing a new digital system that allows e-commerce businesses to obtain required certificates and licenses through an online, application-based platform. Notice No. 3988, which will take effect on February 1, 2026, introduces the E-Trust platform, a downloadable application that allows e-commerce businesses to remotely obtain acknowledgement certificates and business operating licenses. New Digital Registration Options Under the previous framework established by the Decree on E-commerce (2021), businesses were required to complete registration exclusively through paper-based submissions. The new system now offers businesses two registration options: Traditional paper-based process at the Division of E-commerce Management within the MOIC; or Electronic registration and renewal through the E-Trust platform. This change is expected to streamline procedures, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance accessibility for businesses operating outside Vientiane. The E-Trust platform facilitates compliance for both individuals and legal entities required to submit applications and renewals for required certificates and licenses. The development is particularly beneficial for businesses located in remote provinces, as it eliminates the need for physical travel and significantly accelerates processing times. Compliance Requirements and Penalties Businesses must obtain or renew the required certificates and licenses to avoid sanctions under the Decision on Fines and Other Measures for Violation of the Decree and Regulations on E-commerce (No. 2828/MOIC, dated November 11, 2025). Penalties for noncompliance may include monetary fines and other enforcement measures.
Read More
December 26, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has released the Guidelines for Digital Fraud Management, which took effect on December 17, 2025, incorporating certain amendments to the draft guidelines issued in March 2025. These official guidelines aim for end-to-end digital fraud prevention, with a particular focus on mule accounts, to enhance trust and security in Thailand’s financial system. The guidelines apply to “financial service providers,” including: Financial institutions and special financial institutions under the Financial Institution Business Act; and Operators of Inter-institutional Fund Transfer System e-money services and e-fund transfer services under the Payment Systems Act. Besides commercial banks and e-money operators that offer fund-transfer services, other providers may adopt requirements based on risk proportionality and baseline standards set out in the guidelines (for instance, an e-money operator that does not offer e-fund transfer services could consider implementing a fraud monitoring and detection system according to the risk level of its service). The guidelines establish the following key requirements: Policy and oversight. Directors and senior executives of financial service providers must adopt appropriate “end-to-end” fraud management policies and KPIs to manage digital fraud, covering prevention, monitoring, detection, management, resolution, and support for affected customers. The fraud management policy must be regularly reviewed, and whenever there is a situation or change that significantly affects the efficiency of the fraud management. Any significant update to the policy must first be approved by the board of the financial service provider. The BOT also encourages providers to collaborate in establishing industry standards aligned with applicable laws and regulations to ensure consistency and best practices across the sector. Fraud management processes. Financial service providers must establish a clear framework for managing digital fraud throughout the customer lifecycle—from customer onboarding to service termination—covering at least the following processes: Know your customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD):
Read More
December 19, 2025
Prior to the dissolution of the House of Representatives, Thailand’s cabinet approved a draft amendment to the Administrative Procedure Act, following review by the Council of State. If enacted, this reform will fundamentally change how state agencies process business applications and appeals by imposing enforceable timelines and legal consequences for inaction. The draft directly targets a longstanding commercial frustration: applications and appeals that vanish into administrative silence, stalling investment and foreclosing judicial review across sectors ranging from real estate and manufacturing to healthcare and finance. The “Silence Means Yes” Rule for Applications At the core of the reform is a new automatic “approval by implication” for applications subject to statutory processing deadlines. If an official fails to notify an applicant of a decision within the legally prescribed period, the application will be deemed approved as a matter of law. This presumption shifts the costs of delay from businesses to the bureaucracy and gives applicants a definitive legal position once time expires. The mechanism applies to routine licensing and registration matters governed by explicit consideration periods in existing statutes or ministerial regulations. Officials may extend the decision period by up to thirty days, but only if they notify the applicant before the original deadline and substantiate that the delay arises from genuinely exceptional circumstances beyond their control. Certain sensitive applications are expressly excluded from automatic approval, including those that may significantly affect national security or defense, public safety and health, the environment or natural resources, or national cultural heritage. Once the deadline passes without a decision, businesses can proceed with deployment of capital and operations—construction, hiring, procurement, and market entry—without waiting for formal permission that may never arrive. For time-sensitive projects, this materially reduces regulatory timing risk. The “Deemed Rejection” Rule for Appeals The draft introduces a parallel “deemed rejection”
Read More