You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 3, 2019

Allowing Foreign Investment in the Yangon Stock Exchange Is Good News for Myanmar

Informed Counsel

On July 12, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Myanmar issued Notification 1/2019, which announced that foreign individuals and foreign entities will be permitted to invest in up to 35% of the shares in Myanmar companies listed on the Yangon Stock Exchange (YSX). This limitation aligns with the classification of any company with greater than 35% foreign shareholding as a “foreign” company under the Myanmar Companies Law (2017)—a classification which introduces many complications, not least of which is a restriction against owning land under the Transfer of Immoveable Property (Restriction) Act (1987). For a listed company, designation as a foreign company could therefore be ruinous, and although the YSX’s 35% foreign investment cap may seem a heavy fetter at first glance, in that context it is very reasonable.

In fact, the entire program of foreign investment, although not materialized in full at the time of writing, so far seems to be very progressive and reasonable. For example, trading on the YSX will be open to all foreigners, not restricted to Myanmar residents, and unlike the somewhat slow pace of reforms often seen in developing countries, foreign trading on the YSX is expected to begin in the near future—perhaps even sometime before the end of 2019 according to our sources. We understand that the YSX has even invested in the necessary software systems to allow for calculation of the 35% threshold, and had already implemented them ready for trading to begin. To the uninitiated, this may seem entirely at odds with the usual pace of reforms in developing countries. To regular Myanmar watchers, however, this kind of rapid and progressive change to the commercial landscape is becoming a regular feature.

This is, to some degree, because Myanmar’s determination to foster rapid economic growth is rooted in a strong understanding of the precedents set elsewhere. Research has shown that stock exchange development is extremely important for economic development. According to a report by the World Federation of Exchanges and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development entitled The Role of Stock Exchanges in Fostering Economic Growth and Sustainable Development, “[w]ell-functioning exchanges enable economic growth and development by facilitating the mobilisation of financial resources—by bringing together those who need capital to innovate and grow, with those who have resources to invest. They do this within an environment that is regulated, secure, transparent and equitable. Exchanges also seek to promote good corporate governance amongst their listed issuers, encouraging transparency, accountability and respect for the rights of shareholders and key stakeholders.”

Furthermore, the theoretical and academic literature predominantly finds positive links between well-functioning exchanges and economic development. In a study looking at the performance of firms (used here in the economic sense to mean “business organizations”), Demigüç-Kunt and Vojislav (1996) found that firms in countries with “active” stock markets experience higher-than-predicted growth rates. Another study by Beck and Levine (2002), looking at data from 40 countries over four five-year periods, found not only that financial market development is important for economic growth but that both banks and stock markets independently and concurrently have a role to play. Caporale et al (2004) looked explicitly at the question of causality and concluded that well-developed stock markets can foster economic growth (see here).

Although some may be skeptical of the prospects for the YSX, in the medium to longer term we have more confidence. Our sources tell us that a number of foreign institutions have already expressed interest in investing in the YSX, with funds already allocated for investment in Myanmar. Furthermore, although there are only five companies currently listed on the YSX, we understand that there are at least two further companies already in the listing pipeline. With foreign investment coming to the YSX, interest by domestic companies in listing is only likely to increase. Those wishing to familiarize themselves with the procedure required for listing on the YSX might be interested in referring back to a previous article by this author written for Frontier Myanmar (see here).    

It would also be wrong to see the liberalization of investment in the YSX in isolation. Over the past several years, Myanmar has liberalized the telecommunications, banking, insurance, and wholesale/retail trading sectors, which collectively mark a huge stride forward for what was long regarded as an isolated and impenetrable economy, not to mention the reforms to the Myanmar Investment Law, the new Companies Law, and the new electronic company registration system in Myanmar. This pattern of economic liberalization shows no sign of slowing—for example, foreign banks are expected to be permitted to provide retail banking services in the very near future, and other highly regulated industries will likely follow suit. The liberalization of the YSX is just part of this pattern.    

With this latest announcement, it would seem that this  is now the “end of the beginning” of the YSX. We are moving forward into a new era.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 10, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have issued regulations broadening the criteria for determining who qualifies as a “major shareholder” of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Under relevant SEC regulations, major shareholders of a regulated entity must obtain regulatory approval and undergo screening by the SEC. The revised framework introduces both shareholding-based and control-based tests to determine which shareholders require regulatory approval for a wider range of indirect ownership structures and de facto control. The Ministry of Finance notification took effect on February 21, 2026, while the SEC’s clarifying rules took effect on March 4, 2026. These changes aim to enhance transparency around beneficial ownership and strengthen regulatory oversight of entities operating in Thailand’s capital markets. Expanded Definition Under the revised framework, a “major shareholder” now includes persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 10% of the voting rights in a regulated company, as well as persons who exercise control over the regulated company or its shares. This system of two separate tests, based on both shareholding and control, differs from the prior regime, which focused primarily on shareholding thresholds and applied a more limited method for determining indirect shareholdings. The two tests (detailed below) operate independently of each other, and any person identified by either of the tests will be deemed a major shareholder. Shareholding-Based Test Broadens Indirect Ownership Attribution For the shareholding-based test, the SEC recognizes two existing methods for identifying indirect ownership, together with a new proportional attribution method. Any person captured under these methods, which are described below, will be regarded as a major shareholder of the regulated company and must obtain SEC approval as a major shareholder. First, the existing framework continues to apply to both first-tier and chain ownership structures. Approval is required for (1) first-tier
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which
January 16, 2026
As the Thai stock market faces a downturn, Thai investors have shown increased interest in depositary receipts (DRs), which offer the same tax benefits as Thai stocks while providing access to foreign securities. However, recent speculation in the media has raised concerns among regulators and the market, raising questions about whether DR issuers actually hold the underlying foreign securities purported to be backing the DRs. This has brought the structural integrity of DR programs under scrutiny. Why This Question Matters In global practice, DRs are understood to be backed by the foreign securities they reference, giving investors economic exposure that closely mirrors direct ownership. When the issuer does not hold the underlying securities directly, the risk profile shifts to the strength of its custodial, hedging, and liquidity arrangements. Those arrangements determine whether DR holders receive equivalent economic and voting rights, how corporate actions are transmitted, and whether conversions or redemptions can be completed in full and on time. In Thailand, the standardized DR disclosure templates and the express allowance for global custodians indicate a regulatory focus on transparency and structural safeguards that preserve these outcomes, even if the issuer’s name does not appear on the foreign share register. Thai Rules for DR Offerings Thai DR offerings are governed by specific Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) notifications and standardized prospectus forms. These instruments establish the disclosure regime for DR structures, risk factors, and the issuer’s arrangements to support the DR program. The framework expressly contemplates the use of a global custodian, indicating that DR issuers are not required to hold the underlying foreign securities directly in their own name if sufficient controls and operational arrangements are in place for the issuer to deliver economic benefits and, where applicable, underlying securities to DR holders when required. More broadly, the relevant SEC