You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 12, 2015

AEC Update: Outdated Legislation Hinders the Free Flow of Labor

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

We are approaching the halfway mark of 2015, and many in the international business community—particularly those with investments in Southeast Asia—have questions about the current status of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).

The AEC was originally scheduled to take effect on January 1 of this year, but member states pushed back the deadline to December 31, as many needed more time to prepare. With only half a year to go, this article will focus on Thailand’s laws and regulations and how they match up with the provisions of the AEC.

The overall goal of the AEC is to establish a single market in Southeast Asia. To accomplish this objective, Section 9 of the AEC Blueprint is aimed at establishing a free flow of goods, services, investment, and skilled labor, as well as a freer flow of capital.

Thailand has already made great strides in implementing some of these aims. To facilitate the free flow of goods, for example, the country has effectively eliminated or significantly reduced most tariffs and non-tariff barriers, with some exceptions based on national security and human, animal, plant, and environmental safety. Thailand, along with five other ASEAN members—Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore—has also established its own National Single Window to expedite customs clearance and reduce bureaucracy.

As for the free flow of labor, over the past ten years, ASEAN has made numerous attempts to liberalize the skilled-labor sector. As a result, there are now mutual recognition arrangements (MRAs) in place for the following professions: accounting, architecture, medical profession, dentistry, engineering, nursing, surveying, and tourism.

These MRAs will, in theory, provide unifying qualifications and allow local professionals to seek employment within the region. It should be noted, however, that some of these professions, including tour guiding and architecture, are subject to restrictions in Thailand. By royal decree, Thailand has 39 “protected professions” that foreigners are not allowed to engage in, so certain local laws must be amended to comply with these MRAs. There are currently no plans to introduce MRAs for freelance work or work carried out by independent practitioners.

Streamlining the process for skilled professionals within ASEAN to obtain visas and work permits is another major factor in promoting the free flow of labor. Foreign workers in Thailand, however, are still subject to the Alien Working Act of 2008, under which any foreign national wishing to work in Thailand—with the word “work” being very broadly defined so as to include even volunteer or charity work, with or without remuneration—must file an application to obtain a work permit.

Foreign nationals living and working in Thailand are all too familiar with the administrative hassles involved in obtaining a work permit. Therefore, exemptions that facilitate obtaining work permits should be included in the Alien Working Act for those professions that fall within the scope of MRAs in order for Thailand to fulfill its AEC obligations. Alternatively, new policies that introduce special documentation allowing other ASEAN nationals to work in Thailand legally could be brought into effect.

Yet another obstacle that should be lifted involves the local licensing requirements for professionals. Most of the tests to obtain a license to practice one’s profession in Thailand are still given only in the Thai language. This is obviously quite a hurdle for those who do not speak Thai. Tests should be offered in English, as well.

The UN Population Division estimates that ASEAN currently has 633 million people living in the region. This number is forecasted to reach nearly 700 million by 2025, making it the third-largest workforce in all of Asia, behind India and China. Development within the region is contingent on this massive workforce being able to cross borders more freely.

Changes need to be made to outdated legislation. This, however, will depend on Thailand addressing the conformity of its laws and regulations to the provisions of the AEC, which will require much-needed cooperation between the country’s various government agencies.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
Read More