You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 24, 2020

Actions Available to Employers in Vietnam Facing COVID-19 Business Disruption

Subscribe to Updates

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unavoidable impact on the economy of Vietnam. While the country’s infection numbers remain commendably low thanks to timely and strict containment and mitigation efforts, everyday life and business have still been turned upside-down as buildings have been closed and neighborhoods have been quarantined, and consumers have dramatically changed their spending patterns.

Under these epidemic conditions, while some companies have been able to shift employees to a work-from-home model with minimal disruption, others have been forced to temporarily shut down or curtail operations due to government orders or a lack of customers, leading to the uncomfortable question of what to do with idle employees. Even companies which have successfully switched to an online/work-from-home model are facing difficult decisions about certain types of employees who are no longer being utilized, such as drivers and cleaners.

In the unfortunate situation that continuing with full employment becomes unviable, companies in Vietnam have some options: They can let people go under a restructuring (akin to a layoff); they can keep the employees but renegotiate lower salaries for a temporary period; or they can negotiate mutual termination/voluntary resignation.

1. Restructuring

Article 36.10 of the 2012 Labor Code (valid until January 1, 2021, when it will be replaced by the new 2019 Labor Code) allows employers to terminate the labor contracts of employees in the case of layoffs/redundancy due to “restructuring, changes in technology, or economic reasons.” Decree No. 05/2015/ND-CP of the Government dated January 12, 2015, as amended on October 24, 2018, further defines economic reasons to include economic crisis or recession. Thus, it could be argued that if the COVID-19 pandemic has brought about a recession (which currently is true in Vietnam), then terminations via layoffs would be justifiable.

However, under Vietnam’s labor law, if two or more employees are made redundant, the employer must formulate a “labor usage plan” for the restructuring, identifying who will be let go, and send this to the local trade union, or the employer’s own trade union, if it has one. The employer must then wait for the trade union’s consent, which, in practice, may take two months or more. Some local trade unions may not provide a clear opinion on whether they consent to the provided labor usage plan, but will instead simply reply that the company is required to formulate and implement a labor usage plan in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations of Vietnam. If this is the case, the employer may need to work again with the local trade union, which will take additional time. The provincial labor authority must then be notified of the employees’ termination at least 30 days before the terminations occur. Thus, the timeline for such restructuring can be very long.

Each employee let go must receive one month’s salary per year of service (which does not include the time that the employee participated in unemployment insurance)—and a minimum of two months’ salary—as payment due to termination as a result of redundancy.

2. Temporary Salary Reduction

Vietnam has a few special rules relating to epidemics. Specifically, under Article 98.3 of the Labor Code, if an epidemic (or other force majeure event) has been declared and work must be stopped, employers are allowed to renegotiate with their employees to temporarily accept a lower salary during the work stoppage, provided it is not lower than the statutory regional minimum wage.

As the regional minimum wage is relatively low (currently about USD 190 per month for Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City), salary renegotiation may not be an attractive option for employees, especially those in skilled or white-collar positions.

3. Negotiate Mutual Separation

Because the restructuring process can take a long time, and salary renegotiation may be rejected by the employees, it is always best to meet with the employees, tell them the company is going to conduct a restructuring and thus their positions will be eliminated, but offer them an incentive to agree to a mutual separation. This saves the employer the time of going through the statutory process and saves the employees’ time as well.

Most employees should accept a mutual separation package, which is usually two to three months’ salary, except for those with long service.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2023
Most employers know that terminating employees for poor job performance is not easy. But it is actually legally possible—if employers have the right approach and take specific precautionary measures. However, failing to take these precautions can mean that an employer is either stuck with an incompetent employee or on the losing end of a lawsuit for unfair termination. This article will lay out some essential considerations for employers in Thailand regarding termination of employment for poor performance. First, understand that “poor work performance” is a lack of performance or ability, or an inability to work with other employees. It does not constitute a violation of work rules or regulations. In some cases, however, an employee’s failure to act in accordance with lawful instructions or commands of the employer, resulting in poor work performance, could also be considered a violation of work rules or regulations. This may be the case if the work rules or regulations clearly state that an employee must strictly comply with the employer’s instructions or commands. Second, an employer can, in fact, terminate an employee due to poor work performance. For example, this may be possible in the following scenarios: Records show that an employee’s work performance has fallen below the employer’s required standards, and the employee has not tried to improve his or her work performance for three consecutive years. In addition, it does not appear that the employer was biased when giving ratings or scores for the employee’s work performance. The job description of the employee includes coordination with employees in other departments, but the employee has not been able to do so. Therefore, the employee was reassigned to a new job function, but the employee still did not improve. This suggests that the employee has a lack of interpersonal skills and is not
Read More
March 23, 2023
On March 19, 2023, Thailand’s new work-from-home (WFH) legislation amending the Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023) was published in the Government Gazette. It will come into effect on April 18, 2023. The amendment aims to enhance employee protections to accord with current global standards, provide alternative working arrangements for employers and employees, increase workforce efficiency, and strengthen employees’ job security and a better quality of life. As we detailed previously, the new WFH legislation allows employers and employees to reach agreements that permit employees to work remotely. Since there are no accompanying criminal punishments relating to this new provision, and the legislation incorporates the term “may agree,” it appears that this WFH provision is not mandatory but is primarily intended to facilitate and encourage remote working agreements between employers and employees. For more details on the WFH legislation, or on any aspect of employment law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
February 24, 2023
Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers. A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers. Cambodia The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system. The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines. Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance. On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions. Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300). Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over
Read More
January 19, 2023
The Thai parliament has passed the so-called Work from Home Bill—formally known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)—which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances. The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labor protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand. The legislation adds a single section to the LPA providing that an employer and an employee “may agree in the employment contract” that the employee is allowed “to bring work . . . to perform at home or at the residence of the employee or anywhere that the employee can work remotely through information technology, if the nature of the work permits.” The provision further provides that employers are responsible for ensuring that remote work agreements are in writing, either physically or electronically, and may include the following details: Period of the agreement; Normal working hours, rest periods, and overtime work; Criteria for overtime work, holiday work, and various types of leave; Scope of work and control or supervision by the employer; and Responsibility for arranging supplies and equipment, including necessary costs relating to the work. The amended LPA gives employees who work from home the right to refuse contact from the employer or the supervisor beyond working hours. In addition, employers must treat remote employees equally to on-premise employees. The most notable question surrounding this legislation is whether employers must allow employees to work remotely. The phrase “may agree” suggests that employers do not have to agree to allow an employee to work remotely. Another important aspect of the amendment is that there is no criminal punishment attached to it, which suggests that the legislation
Read More