You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 20, 2025

A Closer Look at Vietnam’s Decree 147 on Internet Services and Online Information

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Decree No. 147/2024/ND-CP on the management, provision, and use of internet services and online information (Decree 147) was issued on November 9, 2024, and came into effect on December 25, 2024. Decree 147 represents a more stringently regulated digital landscape in Vietnam, creating challenges not only for offshore service providers offering cross-border services but also for onshore providers. As these new regulations impose stricter requirements, particularly in areas like content control, user authentication, data storage, and service license/notification, companies will need to adapt quickly to maintain compliance and minimize legal risks.

The following are some of the key topics covered by Decree 147.

[Note: Shortly after the issuance of Decree 147, Vietnam began a government restructuring process, with the aim of streamlining the government by consolidating and eliminating various ministries and agencies. Thus, the decree’s references to authorities such as the Authority of Broadcasting and Electronic Information (ABEI) and the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) are subject to change.]

1. Cross-Border Information Provision

Cross-border information provision is defined broadly as the provision by overseas organizations and individuals of information and online information content services for service users in Vietnam to access or use. This wide-ranging definition encompasses various types of cross-border services, including social network services, online game services, and app store services. However, cross-border provision of online game services remains prohibited under Decree 147 (see further details below).

Offshore providers of services on a cross-border basis who lease data storage in Vietnam or meet a threshold of 100,000 or more total visits per month from Vietnam for six consecutive months (“regulated cross-border providers”) must adhere to stricter requirements. Specifically, they are required to, among other requirements:

  • Notify the relevant authority of their contact information, including the location of the main server providing the service, within 60 days of reaching the total visit threshold.
  • Inspect, monitor, prevent, and remove any content, services, and applications that violate the law within 24 hours from the time of a request from the relevant authority, and within 48 hours of receiving complaints from Vietnamese users regarding content, services, and applications that violate Article 8 of the Cybersecurity Law (which lists a wide range of prohibited acts in cyberspace, such as cyberterrorism, spreading malware, and advertising or trading in banned goods/services).
  • Store personal data of users from Vietnam, such as full name, date of birth, email, and Vietnamese mobile phone number (or ID number), and delete this data when the storage period expires.
  • Provide information of users from Vietnam to the relevant authority upon request for investigation and for law enforcement purposes.
  • Authenticate social network user accounts via users’ Vietnamese mobile phone numbers or ID numbers if they do not have Vietnamese mobile phone numbers, or if they use the livestream feature for commercial purposes; and ensuring that only verified accounts can post information (write posts or comments, livestream) and share content on social networks.
  • Classify and display warnings of content that is not suitable for children.
  • Receive and handle complaints from service users.
  • Provide tools for searching and scanning content as requested by the relevant authority.
  • Report annually to the relevant authority on their service provision to users from Vietnam and on an ad hoc basis regarding matters of national security, social order, and emergency upon the authority’s request.

Failure to comply with these obligations allows the relevant authority to enforce technical measures to block non-compliant content, services, and applications, as well as impose administrative penalties.

Only cross-border service providers who have notified the relevant authority of their contact information are allowed to provide livestream features or provide revenue-generating activities in any form.

2. Social Network Services

Regulated offshore social network service providers will be required to meet the obligations outlined above on cross-border information provision.

Onshore social network services, offered by organizations or enterprises with legal status in Vietnam, are categorized as either “high-visitor” or “low-visitor” based on the number of regular visitors. The high-visitor category includes social networks with total monthly visits of 10,000 or more (based on a monthly average over six consecutive months) or with more than 1,000 regular users in a month (“regular” is not further defined). High-visitor onshore social network service providers are required to obtain a license from the relevant authority to operate, while low-visitor providers must obtain a notification confirmation from the authority to provide social network services.

Only licensed onshore providers are permitted to provide livestream features or engage in revenue-generating activities of any kind. Therefore, if a low-visitor onshore provider intends to offer livestream features or revenue-generated services, it must apply for a social network service license.

Onshore social network service providers face stricter requirements than regulated offshore social network service providers as they must additionally meet obligations including having at least one server in Vietnam to serve investigations and information provision at the request of the relevant authority, connecting to the monitoring system of the relevant authority for statistics and user access monitoring, and being subject to inspections by the authority.

Within 90 days from the effective date of Decree 147 (i.e., by March 25, 2025), both onshore and regulated offshore social network service providers are required to authenticate the identities of their active users. Additionally, within this same timeline, licensed onshore social network service providers are required to review and report to the relevant authority the number of total visits per month from Vietnam for six consecutive months, as well as the number of regular users per month.

Both onshore and offshore social network service providers must temporarily or permanently block social network accounts, community pages, community groups, and content channels that frequently violate the law. Temporary blocking will be applied at the relevant authority’s request when these accounts, community pages/groups, or channels have been found to violate the law at least five times within a 30-day period or at least 10 times within a 90-day period. The temporary block must be implemented within 24 hours of the relevant authority’s request and will last from 7 to 30 days, depending on the number and severity of the violations. A permanent block will be enforced when such accounts, community pages/groups, or channels publish illegal content that impacts national security or have previously been temporarily blocked at least three times as per request from the relevant authority.

If onshore social network service providers do not comply with the request of the relevant authority, the authority will suspend the provision of social networking services or revoke the license.

3. Online Game Services

Decree 147 expressly provides that offshore entities providing online game services to users in Vietnam must establish an enterprise in compliance with the decree and with regulations on foreign investment to provide such services. As a result, the cross-border provision of online games remains prohibited.

Online games are still categorized into four types: G1 games have interaction among multiple players via the game server; G2 games only have interaction between players and the game server; G3 games have interaction among multiple players without interaction between players and the game server; and G4 games are downloaded from the internet without interaction among players or between players and the game server.

Enterprises may provide G1 games after obtaining a license to provide G1 game services and a decision on release of a G1 game. Meanwhile, to provide G2, G3, and G4 games, enterprises must obtain a certificate of game service provision and a notification confirmation of G2, G3, or G4 game release. The license to provide G1 game services and certificate of game service provision for G2, G3 and G4 game services have a 10-year maximum duration while the decision and notification confirmation of game release has a 5-year maximum duration.

Decree 147 explicitly introduces regulations that prohibit the release of online games that feature content and scenarios resembling prizewinning games in casinos or games using images of playing cards. This regulation is designed to prevent transformation of online games into gambling activities in the virtual realm.

The main responsibilities of online game service providers include:

  • Having at least one server in Vietnam to serve the purposes of investigations by the relevant authority and handling of user complaints.
  • Having a website that introduces and provides services, displaying required information such as age-based game classification, rules for handling complaints and disputes, and details about the service provider.
  • Implementing measures to mitigate the negative impacts of each game, including registering, storing, authenticating, and managing player content and information, and ensuring that only players who provide complete and accurate information can participate, and players are warned about the effects of excessive gameplay.
  • Implementing technical measures to manage forums, shared content, and interactions between players.
  • Not advertising online games without a decision on G1 game release or notification confirmation of G2, G3, or G4 game release.
  • Submitting service provision reports regularly every six months and on an ad hoc basis when requested by the relevant authority.
  • Being subject to inspections, examinations, and enforcement actions by the relevant authority.
  • Connecting to legitimate payment methods only.
  • Storing player information for the duration of service use and for six months after a player stops using the service. Providers must also establish a system to connect to the national population database to verify player information upon request by the relevant authority.

4. App Store Services

Regulated cross-border app store service providers will be required to meet the obligations outlined above for cross-border information provision. Additionally, they are required to remove any apps that violate the law within 24 hours of receiving a request from the relevant authority; comply with Vietnamese payment regulations; and ensure that any online game service providers offering services to users in Vietnam provide the decision on G1 game release or notification confirmation of G2, G3, G4 game release before uploading their games to the app store.

5. Telecom, Internet, Web Hosting, Data Center, and Telecom Application Services

Telecom, internet, web hosting, data center and telecom application service providers are required to report to the relevant authority within 24 hours of self-discovery or receipt of feedback or complaints from users about content, services, and applications that violate Article 8 of the Cybersecurity Law; remove infringing content within 24 hours of request from the relevant authority; and handle requests and complaints about intellectual property in accordance with intellectual property laws. Additionally, they are required to submit annual reports to the relevant authority on data storage rental services provided in Vietnam to foreign entities for providing cross-border information to Vietnamese users, as well as ad hoc reports when requested by the relevant authority.

Telecom and internet enterprises must also, among other obligations:

  • Implement necessary technical measures to block access to content, services, and applications that violate the law within 24 hours of receiving a request from the relevant authority, e.g., Department of Cybersecurity and High-Tech Crime Prevention (A05) of the Ministry of Public Security (MPS).
  • Implement measures to monitor, collect, and detect information that violates the law at the request of the relevant authority (for violations of copyright and intellectual property, in compliance with intellectual property law).
  • Provide information and data related to telecom and internet subscribers suspected of violations to enable accurate identification of offenders, upon request from the relevant authority, e.g., A05 under the MPS.
  • Refuse, suspend, or terminate connections to online games without proper licenses or certificates to provide game services or decisions/notification confirmations for game release.
  • Comply with the relevant authority’s requests to coordinate, report, and carry out other measures as requested by the authority.

6. Public Internet Access Points

Owners of public internet access points in hotels, restaurants, airports, coffee shops, and other public spaces who offer paid internet access services must register as internet agency businesses and sign internet agency contracts, while those offering the services for free are not required to do so.

Internet agents are required to display an “internet agent” sign with their registration number. If the location also serves as a public online gaming point or public internet access point, this information must also be clearly indicated on the sign. When providing online game services, internet agents also have the responsibilities of an owner of a public online gaming point. Additionally, they must not organize or allow internet users to use computer features at their business location to perform prohibited acts.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 23, 2026
Vietnam has progressively positioned blockchain as a strategic technology within its broader digital transformation agenda over the past decade. From early policy orientations to more recent legislative developments, the regulatory approach has gradually shifted from high-level recognition to more concrete legal integration. Against this backdrop, a new draft decree regulating activities relating to product and goods identification, authentication, and traceability (the “Draft Decree”) marks a notable turning point. Rather than merely referencing blockchain as a policy priority, the Draft Decree incorporates blockchain directly into a nationwide regulatory system, positioning it as part of the underlying infrastructure for data governance and public administration in relation to the management, verification, and traceability of product-related data. Evolution of Vietnam’s Blockchain Legal Framework: The Draft Decree in Context Vietnam’s blockchain legal framework has developed in several distinct phases. The first phase, beginning around 2019, was characterized by high-level policy recognition in several resolutions of the Party Central Committee. Particularly, blockchain was identified as part of the broader category of digital technologies critical to industrial modernization and participation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These resolutions did not regulate blockchain directly, but established its strategic importance at the national level. The second phase (2023 to 2025) saw the introduction of national strategies and technology policies that more explicitly recognized blockchain as a priority technology. Those policies collectively signaled a clear policy commitment to developing blockchain infrastructure and applications. However, these instruments remained largely at a policy-level and did not establish binding regulatory frameworks. The third phase (from 2025) involves the gradual integration of blockchain into sectoral legislation. Laws such as the Law on Digital Technology Industry (2025), the Law on Personal Data Protection (2025), and the Law on Science, Technology, and Innovation (2025) have introduced concepts such as digital assets, crypto assets, and even specific
Read More
April 21, 2026
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) has launched a public consultation period on a draft notification setting out criteria for data subject access requests (DSARs). The draft notification addresses practical uncertainties in handling DSARs by introducing standardized procedural requirements for data controllers. The consultation period runs from April 16 to May 15, 2026. The notification will enter into force 30 days from the date of its publication in the Government Gazette. Key Features of the Draft Notification The draft notification covers the following key areas: Scope of information subject to access. Data controllers must enable data subjects to access at least the following upon request: (1) personal data collected directly from them; (2) personal data obtained from other sources; and (3) the source of personal data obtained from other sources without consent. Information required under section 23 of the PDPA and information that must be recorded pursuant to section 39 of the PDPA—such as the categories of personal data collected and purposes of processing—must also be made available. Submission channels and formal requirements. Data controllers must provide at least in-person and postal channels for DSARs, while electronic or other channels are optional. Requests may be made either directly by the data subject or through an authorized representative, and must be signed and include sufficient identifying information, a preferred response method, and DSAR details. Identity verification documents (and proof of authority if the request is through a representative) are required, and additional documentation may be requested for verification or communication purposes. Data controllers may use different verification methods for DSARs submitted via electronic or other channels, provided this does not create undue obstacles to the exercise of data subject rights. Verification and response timelines. Data controllers must complete preliminary verification within seven business days of receiving a request. If a
Read More
April 10, 2026
Thailand has introduced new regulatory guidance requiring digital platform operators to adopt structured, transparent, and fair fee practices. On March 16, 2026, the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) published Announcement No. DPS 2/2569, titled “Guidelines for Transparency and Fairness in Digital Platform Service Fee Determination,” issued under the Royal Decree on Digital Platform Service Business Operations B.E. 2565 (2022). The guidelines establish a framework governing how digital platform operators should set, disclose, and adjust fees charged to users and related service providers such as logistics and payment providers. Although framed as best-practice guidance rather than legally binding rules with explicit penalties, the guidelines carry regulatory weight under the royal decree and represent a significant step toward structured governance of digital platform fee practices in Thailand. The guidelines establish various transparency principles and divide fees into two distinct categories—compulsory and additional—with specific governance principles for each. Transparency Principles The guidelines recommend that digital platform operators adopt several transparency measures to ensure that users can fully understand the costs of using a platform. Fee catalog. All fees should be consolidated into a single, accessible location, which should include the fee name, definition, scope of covered services, calculation methodology, rate, billing period, and calculation examples. Minimum service disclosure. Operators should disclose the minimum service that users can expect, such as baseline visibility, product listing capabilities, access to transaction data, and back-end dashboard access. Price structure disclosure. Operators should disclose the categories of costs underlying their fees, such as system maintenance, cybersecurity, and operational costs. While exact cost figures need not be made public, operators should be able to provide numerical data to regulators upon request. Clear fee formulas. Fee calculations should be simple and easy to understand—for example, percentage of net sales, cost per order, or cost per product listing. Operators should
Read More
April 10, 2026
As digital commerce continues to reshape consumer behavior in Thailand, the Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has been taking steps to review and update key regulations for online platforms. The OCPB has had a particular focus on addressing the risks posed by e-marketplace businesses—from misleading product information to fraudulent online transactions. Some of the regulator’s current legislative efforts related to Thailand’s labeling regulations as well as potential changes to the country’s law on direct sales and marketing. Proposed Changes to Consumer Protection Labeling Regulations On February 24, 2026, the OCPB convened a public hearing to review the Notification of the Committee on Labels re: Specification of Goods as Controlled Label Goods B.E. 2565 (2022) and its annex issued under the Consumer Protection Act. The closed-door session, which started the OPCD’s process of seeking feedback on the proposed changes, brought together representatives from government agencies, business operators, and consumer groups. The OCPB explained that its review of the labeling regulations aims to address regulatory gaps arising from evolving commercial practices, particularly the expansion of e-commerce and cross-border transactions. Authorities highlighted recurring issues involving product information that is unclear, incomplete, or potentially misleading in digital sales channels. The proposed revisions are intended to improve consumers’ access to accurate and complete product information, ensure that label disclosures remain relevant amid the growth of e-commerce, and strengthen protections against deceptive or misleading digital advertising. The review is being undertaken pursuant to the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979). As part of the initiative, the OCPB signaled a potential update to the categories of “controlled label products” as well as enhanced disclosure obligations for business operators, with the broader aim of promoting greater transparency, reinforcing operator accountability, and aligning Thailand’s labeling framework with current market conditions. The OCPB secretary general emphasized that
Read More