You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 20, 2025

A Closer Look at Vietnam’s Decree 147 on Internet Services and Online Information

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Decree No. 147/2024/ND-CP on the management, provision, and use of internet services and online information (Decree 147) was issued on November 9, 2024, and came into effect on December 25, 2024. Decree 147 represents a more stringently regulated digital landscape in Vietnam, creating challenges not only for offshore service providers offering cross-border services but also for onshore providers. As these new regulations impose stricter requirements, particularly in areas like content control, user authentication, data storage, and service license/notification, companies will need to adapt quickly to maintain compliance and minimize legal risks.

The following are some of the key topics covered by Decree 147.

[Note: Shortly after the issuance of Decree 147, Vietnam began a government restructuring process, with the aim of streamlining the government by consolidating and eliminating various ministries and agencies. Thus, the decree’s references to authorities such as the Authority of Broadcasting and Electronic Information (ABEI) and the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) are subject to change.]

1. Cross-Border Information Provision

Cross-border information provision is defined broadly as the provision by overseas organizations and individuals of information and online information content services for service users in Vietnam to access or use. This wide-ranging definition encompasses various types of cross-border services, including social network services, online game services, and app store services. However, cross-border provision of online game services remains prohibited under Decree 147 (see further details below).

Offshore providers of services on a cross-border basis who lease data storage in Vietnam or meet a threshold of 100,000 or more total visits per month from Vietnam for six consecutive months (“regulated cross-border providers”) must adhere to stricter requirements. Specifically, they are required to, among other requirements:

  • Notify the relevant authority of their contact information, including the location of the main server providing the service, within 60 days of reaching the total visit threshold.
  • Inspect, monitor, prevent, and remove any content, services, and applications that violate the law within 24 hours from the time of a request from the relevant authority, and within 48 hours of receiving complaints from Vietnamese users regarding content, services, and applications that violate Article 8 of the Cybersecurity Law (which lists a wide range of prohibited acts in cyberspace, such as cyberterrorism, spreading malware, and advertising or trading in banned goods/services).
  • Store personal data of users from Vietnam, such as full name, date of birth, email, and Vietnamese mobile phone number (or ID number), and delete this data when the storage period expires.
  • Provide information of users from Vietnam to the relevant authority upon request for investigation and for law enforcement purposes.
  • Authenticate social network user accounts via users’ Vietnamese mobile phone numbers or ID numbers if they do not have Vietnamese mobile phone numbers, or if they use the livestream feature for commercial purposes; and ensuring that only verified accounts can post information (write posts or comments, livestream) and share content on social networks.
  • Classify and display warnings of content that is not suitable for children.
  • Receive and handle complaints from service users.
  • Provide tools for searching and scanning content as requested by the relevant authority.
  • Report annually to the relevant authority on their service provision to users from Vietnam and on an ad hoc basis regarding matters of national security, social order, and emergency upon the authority’s request.

Failure to comply with these obligations allows the relevant authority to enforce technical measures to block non-compliant content, services, and applications, as well as impose administrative penalties.

Only cross-border service providers who have notified the relevant authority of their contact information are allowed to provide livestream features or provide revenue-generating activities in any form.

2. Social Network Services

Regulated offshore social network service providers will be required to meet the obligations outlined above on cross-border information provision.

Onshore social network services, offered by organizations or enterprises with legal status in Vietnam, are categorized as either “high-visitor” or “low-visitor” based on the number of regular visitors. The high-visitor category includes social networks with total monthly visits of 10,000 or more (based on a monthly average over six consecutive months) or with more than 1,000 regular users in a month (“regular” is not further defined). High-visitor onshore social network service providers are required to obtain a license from the relevant authority to operate, while low-visitor providers must obtain a notification confirmation from the authority to provide social network services.

Only licensed onshore providers are permitted to provide livestream features or engage in revenue-generating activities of any kind. Therefore, if a low-visitor onshore provider intends to offer livestream features or revenue-generated services, it must apply for a social network service license.

Onshore social network service providers face stricter requirements than regulated offshore social network service providers as they must additionally meet obligations including having at least one server in Vietnam to serve investigations and information provision at the request of the relevant authority, connecting to the monitoring system of the relevant authority for statistics and user access monitoring, and being subject to inspections by the authority.

Within 90 days from the effective date of Decree 147 (i.e., by March 25, 2025), both onshore and regulated offshore social network service providers are required to authenticate the identities of their active users. Additionally, within this same timeline, licensed onshore social network service providers are required to review and report to the relevant authority the number of total visits per month from Vietnam for six consecutive months, as well as the number of regular users per month.

Both onshore and offshore social network service providers must temporarily or permanently block social network accounts, community pages, community groups, and content channels that frequently violate the law. Temporary blocking will be applied at the relevant authority’s request when these accounts, community pages/groups, or channels have been found to violate the law at least five times within a 30-day period or at least 10 times within a 90-day period. The temporary block must be implemented within 24 hours of the relevant authority’s request and will last from 7 to 30 days, depending on the number and severity of the violations. A permanent block will be enforced when such accounts, community pages/groups, or channels publish illegal content that impacts national security or have previously been temporarily blocked at least three times as per request from the relevant authority.

If onshore social network service providers do not comply with the request of the relevant authority, the authority will suspend the provision of social networking services or revoke the license.

3. Online Game Services

Decree 147 expressly provides that offshore entities providing online game services to users in Vietnam must establish an enterprise in compliance with the decree and with regulations on foreign investment to provide such services. As a result, the cross-border provision of online games remains prohibited.

Online games are still categorized into four types: G1 games have interaction among multiple players via the game server; G2 games only have interaction between players and the game server; G3 games have interaction among multiple players without interaction between players and the game server; and G4 games are downloaded from the internet without interaction among players or between players and the game server.

Enterprises may provide G1 games after obtaining a license to provide G1 game services and a decision on release of a G1 game. Meanwhile, to provide G2, G3, and G4 games, enterprises must obtain a certificate of game service provision and a notification confirmation of G2, G3, or G4 game release. The license to provide G1 game services and certificate of game service provision for G2, G3 and G4 game services have a 10-year maximum duration while the decision and notification confirmation of game release has a 5-year maximum duration.

Decree 147 explicitly introduces regulations that prohibit the release of online games that feature content and scenarios resembling prizewinning games in casinos or games using images of playing cards. This regulation is designed to prevent transformation of online games into gambling activities in the virtual realm.

The main responsibilities of online game service providers include:

  • Having at least one server in Vietnam to serve the purposes of investigations by the relevant authority and handling of user complaints.
  • Having a website that introduces and provides services, displaying required information such as age-based game classification, rules for handling complaints and disputes, and details about the service provider.
  • Implementing measures to mitigate the negative impacts of each game, including registering, storing, authenticating, and managing player content and information, and ensuring that only players who provide complete and accurate information can participate, and players are warned about the effects of excessive gameplay.
  • Implementing technical measures to manage forums, shared content, and interactions between players.
  • Not advertising online games without a decision on G1 game release or notification confirmation of G2, G3, or G4 game release.
  • Submitting service provision reports regularly every six months and on an ad hoc basis when requested by the relevant authority.
  • Being subject to inspections, examinations, and enforcement actions by the relevant authority.
  • Connecting to legitimate payment methods only.
  • Storing player information for the duration of service use and for six months after a player stops using the service. Providers must also establish a system to connect to the national population database to verify player information upon request by the relevant authority.

4. App Store Services

Regulated cross-border app store service providers will be required to meet the obligations outlined above for cross-border information provision. Additionally, they are required to remove any apps that violate the law within 24 hours of receiving a request from the relevant authority; comply with Vietnamese payment regulations; and ensure that any online game service providers offering services to users in Vietnam provide the decision on G1 game release or notification confirmation of G2, G3, G4 game release before uploading their games to the app store.

5. Telecom, Internet, Web Hosting, Data Center, and Telecom Application Services

Telecom, internet, web hosting, data center and telecom application service providers are required to report to the relevant authority within 24 hours of self-discovery or receipt of feedback or complaints from users about content, services, and applications that violate Article 8 of the Cybersecurity Law; remove infringing content within 24 hours of request from the relevant authority; and handle requests and complaints about intellectual property in accordance with intellectual property laws. Additionally, they are required to submit annual reports to the relevant authority on data storage rental services provided in Vietnam to foreign entities for providing cross-border information to Vietnamese users, as well as ad hoc reports when requested by the relevant authority.

Telecom and internet enterprises must also, among other obligations:

  • Implement necessary technical measures to block access to content, services, and applications that violate the law within 24 hours of receiving a request from the relevant authority, e.g., Department of Cybersecurity and High-Tech Crime Prevention (A05) of the Ministry of Public Security (MPS).
  • Implement measures to monitor, collect, and detect information that violates the law at the request of the relevant authority (for violations of copyright and intellectual property, in compliance with intellectual property law).
  • Provide information and data related to telecom and internet subscribers suspected of violations to enable accurate identification of offenders, upon request from the relevant authority, e.g., A05 under the MPS.
  • Refuse, suspend, or terminate connections to online games without proper licenses or certificates to provide game services or decisions/notification confirmations for game release.
  • Comply with the relevant authority’s requests to coordinate, report, and carry out other measures as requested by the authority.

6. Public Internet Access Points

Owners of public internet access points in hotels, restaurants, airports, coffee shops, and other public spaces who offer paid internet access services must register as internet agency businesses and sign internet agency contracts, while those offering the services for free are not required to do so.

Internet agents are required to display an “internet agent” sign with their registration number. If the location also serves as a public online gaming point or public internet access point, this information must also be clearly indicated on the sign. When providing online game services, internet agents also have the responsibilities of an owner of a public online gaming point. Additionally, they must not organize or allow internet users to use computer features at their business location to perform prohibited acts.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 23, 2026
On May 26, 2026, Thailand’s Department of Land Transport (DLT) published for public consultation a draft amendment to the Ministerial Regulation on Electronic Ride-Hailing Vehicles that would, for the first time, allow juristic persons (legal entities) to register vehicles as electronic ride-hailing cars—a right that currently belongs exclusively to natural persons, limited to one person per one vehicle. If finalized in its current form, the regulation would significantly expand the supply side of Thailand’s ride-hailing market by enabling corporate fleet operators to enter the space. The public comment period is open through June 24, 2026. Key Principles Under the Draft Regulation Under the proposed amendment, juristic persons that maintain a fleet of at least 50 vehicles will be permitted to register vehicles as electronic ride-hailing cars. This represents a fundamental shift from the current framework, which restricts registration to individual natural persons on a one-person-one-car basis. Vehicle Specifications Corporate-owned ride-hailing vehicles must meet the following requirements: Be brand new from the factory, or no more than two years old from first registration with no more than 20,000 km of use. Not be a vehicle that has been reconstructed or repaired after involvement in a serious accident affecting safety—a standard consistent with public transport vehicles (RorYor. 6). Be classified as small, medium, or large in accordance with ministerial or director-general specifications. The vehicles may be equipped with safety devices such as interior or exterior cameras (video/photo recording) and can retain the original factory color of the vehicle body (no mandatory color change is required). License Plates Corporate ride-hailing vehicles will use license plates of the same size, characteristics, and color as those for private passenger vehicles not exceeding seven seats (RorYor. 1), rather than public transport plates. Potential Impact The government has stated that the regulation is intended to: Promote
Read More
June 23, 2026
On May 14, 2026, Thailand published a ministerial regulation in the Government Gazette to prescribe measures for prevention and suppression of technology crimes. The regulation creates a comprehensive procedural framework for returning money and digital assets to victims of technology crimes. It will take effect 90 days after publication (in mid-August 2026), giving affected entities a limited window to prepare. Mandatory Reporting Obligations for Financial Institutions When a deposit account, e-money account, or digital asset wallet is frozen in connection with a technology crime, the relevant financial institution or business operator must report transaction data to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) via AMLO’s designated electronic system. Required data elements include account numbers (sender and receiver), names, identification or passport numbers, legal entity registration numbers, phone numbers, remaining balance, damage amount, transaction reference numbers, and the bank case ID. Institutions that already share data through the information-sharing system under the emergency decree are deemed to have satisfied this reporting obligation, creating an incentive for platform participation. When the Royal Thai Police or the Department of Special Investigation seize or freeze assets related to technology crimes, they must provide AMLO with investigation reports, complaint evidence, money-trail data, and account statements. Notification and Claims Process Once the AMLO secretary-general approves verified reports of a technology crime, the account information of persons connected to the crime will be published in the Government Gazette, triggering a 90-day window for victims to file claims and for related persons to file objections. Officers will also publish details on AMLO’s electronic media and send registered mail to identified victims, which will be deemed received after 7 days domestically or 15 days internationally. Victims have 90 days from the date the crime is published in the Government Gazette to file claims through AMLO’s electronic system. Claims must include
Read More
June 15, 2026
The surge in AI development has led to a desperate demand for large, high-quality training data. However, real-world data can be expensive to collect, difficult to access, and often subject to strict privacy and regulatory constraints. Synthetic data, which consists of artificially generated records that replicate the statistical properties of real-world data without reproducing specific individuals’ information, provides an appealing solution by generating artificial datasets at scale without relying on identifiable personal information. It combines speed, cost efficiency, and regulatory compliance, making it a sensible alternative for organizations seeking to reduce risks while maintaining data utility. When properly anonymized, synthetic datasets may fall outside the scope of laws such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), reducing compliance burdens while still supporting high-quality model training. However, relying on synthetic data without rigorous legal due diligence could be a strategic mistake. It replaces one set of known risks (scraping, direct privacy liability) with a new set of complex liabilities. The narrative that synthetic data is a “silver bullet” for privacy and IP compliance is dangerous and could be misleading. While synthetic data addresses data scarcity, it also introduces new legal uncertainties. Legal counsel should anticipate downstream risks arising from compromised data sources. Models trained on unlawfully obtained data may need to be decommissioned, even if their outputs appear lawful. What is synthetic data? Synthetic data refers to artificially generated information created using AI techniques such as deep learning and generative models. Instead of copying real records, it reproduces the statistical patterns and relationships found in the original dataset. Synthetic data generally falls into three categories: Fully synthetic data – Entirely new data points generated from learned patterns. The model studies the structure of the original data and produces records that resemble real-world
Read More
June 11, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) has released a revised draft Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) for public hearing from May 12, 2026, to June 15, 2026. This is not merely an amendment to certain provisions of the current ETA, but a comprehensive redrafting of the entire act. The revised draft ETA introduces several significant changes from the current framework, with practical implications for businesses operating in Thailand. Unified Coverage of Public and Private Sectors The current law segregates government transactions into a separate chapter with distinct rules. The draft ETA eliminates this division, defining “transaction” to encompass civil and commercial juristic acts as well as administrative procedures, administrative contracts, and other acts of government agencies. Enhanced E-Signature Definition The definition of “electronic signature” is broadened to expressly include biometric data and refocused on identifying the signatory and demonstrating intent regarding the content of the electronic data. Shift in Burden of Proof When a party challenges the reliability of electronic data created using a “trusted electronic method” or a method prescribed by the ETDA, the burden of proof and the cost of proving unreliability shifts to the challenger. Introduction of New Digital Method Concepts The draft ETA introduces several new digital method concepts that are not currently recognized under the existing ETA framework. These include: Electronic timestamping (e-timestamp) Electronic registered delivery Electronic company seals Electronic stamp duty compliance Electronic identity authentication and verification Electronic transferable records (electronic bills of lading, promissory notes, and similar negotiable instruments) Recognition of Automated Systems and Electronic Contracting The draft ETA expressly recognizes the legal validity and enforceability of contracts formed through automated systems, including contracts concluded entirely between automated systems or between an automated system and a person. A party may not deny the binding effect of such contracts solely because no human review
Read More