You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

//
INSIGHTS

Insights

We provide you with all of the latest legal developments in Southeast Asia, ensuring that you have the up-to-date knowledge you need to navigate the ever-changing legal landscape affecting your business. You can browse our entire library of publications below, and email [email protected] to sign up for updates that are relevant to your interests, delivered straight to your mailbox, as they emerge.

Search Insights

  • Order by
  • Reset

Search Results

0 results found

April 29, 2011
With Vietnam’s entry into the World Trade Organization, it is expected that franchising activity in the country will increase markedly over the next few years. There are presently a handful of major franchises operating in the country, including Kentucky Fried Chicken, Subway, Lotteria, Jollibee, Pho 24, Gloria Jean’s Coffees, Buntamita, and Cartridge World. These franchises view Vietnam as strong potential market, as it is the 12th most populous country in the world, with a young dynamic population that places a high premium on reputable international brands.
April 29, 2011
In the 15 years since Thailand became a member of the TRIPs Agreement, the country’s intellectual property laws have evolved significantly. A major evolution in the protection of IP rights in Thailand was the establishment in 1997 of the Intellectual Property and International Trade Court, which serves as the court of first instance for IP cases, after which cases may be appealed directly to the Supreme Court.
April 29, 2011
Under trademark law, a trademark owner has the exclusive right to use his/her registered mark. In reality, however, other traders may use or intend to use a trademark that is identical with or similar to such a registered mark. In these circumstances, those who would like to use such a mark may contact the owner of the prior registered trademark to obtain consent, in the form of an agreement, allowing them to use or even to register that similar mark. The purpose of this agreement is to allow the similar trademark to be registered and coexist with the prior registered trademark.
April 29, 2011
Recent political events in Thailand have impacted the lives of many, some in tragic and permanent ways. The unrest, which led to a near complete shut-down of Bangkok’s Commercial Center, culminated in chaos and physical destruction, impacting many business operators. Basic public utility services such as electricity, water, and telephones were not available in many areas. For security reasons, banks were forced to close, roads were blocked, and businesses could not operate or were otherwise forced to implement emergency plans to continue operations. Under these unique ci
April 29, 2011
On April 30, 2010, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published its 2010 Special 301 Report examining the application and effectiveness of intellectual property rights enforcement by countries around the world. Thailand, for the fourth year in a row, has been maintained on the Priority Watch List. The USTR has highlighted its concerns regarding the increase of manufacturing and distribution of illegal optical discs and the significant amount of internet, cable, and signal piracy. This article looks at the Report’s findings and its expected impact.
April 29, 2011
Foreign agrochemical companies usually opt to appoint their local distributors, agents, or licensees as the local entity to apply for and maintain product registration and import licenses as required by Asian Ministries of Agriculture. Such appointments are normally set out in the distribution agreement. While on most occasions this is a mutually beneficial relationship, sometimes local partners who have built up the business for those products may begin to compete unfairly or commit other breaches.
April 29, 2011
In our experience, many clients have regretted trusting their employees—and in some cases, their business partners—with their intellectual property rights. When a business becomes successful, it runs the risk of some employees or business partners believing that they could set up a similar business and apply key insights gleaned from the company’s IPR to attract the same customers and gain greater profits and market share.
April 29, 2011
In typical trade secrets cases, the alleged infringer will be a new employee, a former employee, or a third party whom the owner of the trade secret worked with (e.g., consultants, vendors, visitors to the factory, universities, outside inventors, or even governments). Since the two parties know each other, the conflict usually becomes more personal and it can lead to some difficulties when litigation occurs, especially when parties begin to personalize their grievances.