You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 9, 2024

Critical Updates to Vietnam’s Regulatory Framework for Intermediary Payment Services

Subscribe to Updates

As non-cash payments continue to surge in Vietnam, the requirement for strong security standards and a clear legislative framework for intermediary payment services (“IPS”) is becoming more and more critical. Recognizing this, the State Bank of Vietnam (“SBV”) has been working on a draft decree to supersede the outdated Decree No. 101/2012/ND-CP dated November 22, 2012, on non-cash payments (“Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree”), which will lay the groundwork for non-cash payments in general and the provision of IPS in particular.

Building upon this, the SBV recently issued a draft circular to replace Circular No. 39/2014/TT-NHNN dated December 11, 2014, on IPS (“Circular 39”) (“Draft IPS Circular”), which will offer more detailed guidance on the provision of IPS in Vietnam on top of the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree. The Draft IPS Circular will be applicable to (i) IPS providers; (ii) foreign organizations providing IPS in Vietnam; and (iii) organizations and individuals involved in the provision of IPS.

Some key updates regarding the Draft IPS Circular are as follows:

Scope of Application

The Draft IPS Circular sets out further guidance for the provision of IPS as listed under the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree, including: (i) electronic clearing services; (ii) electronic wallet (“e-wallet”) services; (iii) collection and payment support services; (iv) financial switching services; (v) international financial switching services; and (vi) electronic payment gateway services.

Notably, the Draft IPS Circular has explicitly excluded from its scope of application the provision of accounts by goods/service providers to their customers solely for the purpose of payment within the systems of such providers (e.g., cards/coupons or service/transaction accounts of online game service providers, transportation service providers, or securities companies, etc.).

Requirements on the Provision of IPS

Electronic Clearing Services: The Draft IPS Circular introduces regulations to cover certain elements of electronic clearing services that have not been explicitly outlined in Circular 39. This is done to ensure alignment with Circular No. 37/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016, on the management, operation, and use of the national interbank electronic payment system, specifically:

  • Additional clarification is provided on the responsibilities of the “organization presiding over electronic clearing system,” which refers to an IPS provider licensed by the SBV to offer financial switching services and electronic clearing services. This organization is also permitted to directly participate in and connect with the interbank electronic payment system (“IEPS”) for the purpose of conducting electronic clearing settlements. To achieve this, the organization will have to construct and operate an Electronic Clearing System.
  • To send, receive, and process payment transactions, IPS providers need to be members of the Electronic Clearing System. This system consists of two types of memberships: settlement members and non-settlement members. Settlement members in the system have an established net debt limit within the system, maintain a payment account at the SBV Transaction Office, and are responsible for managing their own clearing settlements. Non-settlement members depend on settlement members to manage these tasks while still being able to send, receive, and process payment transactions within the system.
  • The conditions for becoming a settlement member include: (i) being a direct member of the IEPS; (ii) establishing, monitoring, and managing an electronic clearing limit; and (iii) having written commitments with the organization presiding over the Electronic Clearing System and the SBV Transaction Office regarding its payment ability.

E-Wallet Services: The Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree and the Draft IPS Circular tightly regulate e-wallet services in the same manner as other non-cash payment methods. Some notable requirements for the provision of e-wallet services include the following:

  • E-wallet customers: Pursuant to the Draft IPS Circular, e-wallet customers are individuals and organizations allowed to open and have payment accounts at banks and/or branches of foreign banks. E-wallet service providers are not allowed to open their own e-wallets.
  • E-wallet opening channels: E-wallet opening channels have been expanded, allowing customers to also register to open e-wallets directly at partnered banks or their online transaction channels according to the e-wallet service contracts/agreements between the e-wallet service providers and the partnered banks.
  • E-wallet transaction limit: The Draft IPS Circular prescribes the personal e-wallet limit at VND 100 million/month (about USD 400/month) for normal payment transactions (excluding transactions for goods and services serving the essential needs of consumers).
  • Linking e-wallets with owners’ payment accounts/debit cards: In order to maintain a strict management approach as reflected in the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree as well as the SBV’s recent directions, the Draft IPS Circular does not allow e-wallet customers to use e-wallets in the absence of a connection with their payment accounts/debit cards.
  • E-wallet services payment capability assurance: The Draft IPS Circular requires that e-wallet service providers must maintain (i) a payment guarantee account specifically for e-wallet services; and (ii) segregation of account information, money flows, and the use of the payment guarantee account for e-wallet services, as well as for any collection and payment support services, if applicable.

Collection and Payment Support Services: The Draft IPS Circular sets forth several principles on the provision of collection and payment support services, including: (i) subjects allowed to use the services (i.e., customers having payment accounts or bank cards); (ii) requirements for an agreement or contract with the partnered banks, which are to contain regulations on payment guarantee measures for the provision of these services, including opening a payment guarantee account, maintaining deposits, or other guarantee measures.

IPS Containing International Elements: The Draft IPS Circular provides guidance on the provision of IPS containing international elements, specifically regarding (i) foreign IPS providers that offer IPS to customers who are non-residents and foreigners residing in Vietnam to perform payment transactions for goods and/or services in Vietnam; and (ii) Vietnamese IPS providers who allow customers to perform payment transactions for goods and/or services in foreign countries.

Electronic Payment Gateway Services: The Draft IPS Circular separates the obligations of financial switching service providers, international financial switching service providers, and electronic clearing service providers from those of electronic payment gateway service providers. This separation is made due to the distinct nature of the former services, which involve providing services to parties involved in the payment systems rather than directly to customers, as is the case with payment gateway services. The Draft IPS Circular also includes a section outlining the obligations of electronic payment gateway service providers, covering their responsibilities toward both their customers and their service provision partners, such as associated banks and merchants.

Short Transitional Period

The Draft IPS Circular is expected to take effect on July 1, 2024, with a transitional period until December 31, 2024, for IPS providers to review existing information, documents, procedures, etc., and implement necessary measures to ensure full compliance. Depending on the specific circumstances, failure to do so may subject the IPS providers to penalties such as enforced termination of service provision, termination of respective partnership contracts/agreements, or termination of partnership from January 1, 2025.

IPS-Related Issues Under Other Legal Instruments

In addition to the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree and the Draft IPS Circular, several recently released and impending legal instruments also have the potential to reshape the legal landscape for the provision of IPS in Vietnam. These include the following:

  • Decision No. 2345/QD-NHNN of the SBV dated December 18, 2023, on the application of safety and security measures to online payment and card payment: Categorizes online transactions based on transaction value and imposes specific authentication measures on the respective transaction categories, especially including an authentication mechanism using biometric data for certain transactions. Also prescribes risk mitigation solutions in online payments applicable to IPS providers, including notably: (i) customer authentication for individual customers for their first transaction using mobile banking; (ii) notification of first log-in to internet banking/mobile banking applications; and (iii) storage of information about devices on which customers’ online transactions are carried out and transaction authentication logs.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular No. 46/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated December 31, 2014, guiding non-cash payment services: Addresses the responsibilities of payment service providers when cooperating with IPS providers, including (i) the responsibility to have a written agreement that clearly stipulates the parties’ obligations regarding confidentiality of customer information, payment transactions, and liability for violations of this obligation; and (ii) the responsibility for coordinating with IPS providers in checking and comparing data, authenticating transactions, customer information, etc.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular No. 20/2018/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated August 30, 2018, on the supervision of payment systems: Regulates the supervision of activities related to the provision of IPS, including monitoring compliance with legal regulations and overseeing risk management activities. These activities encompass policy development, risk management processes, and implementation activities.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular 19/2016/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated June 30, 2016, on bank card operations: Addresses the cooperation between IPS providers and other parties in transactions related to bank cards, specifically in the electronic switching and clearing of these transactions.
  • Draft circular on payment agent services: Expands regulations to encompass certain activities that resemble those of IPS providers but are not legally considered IPS. These activities now may include the following on behalf of banks: (i) collecting and verifying documents to open accounts, (ii) receiving and verifying information for bank card issuance, and (iii) handling customer service, processing transactions, and receiving or paying cash for customers.

Conclusion

As part of a series of draft circulars under the regulatory development program of the SBV this year, the Draft IPS Circular encompasses a number of new and more stringent regulations on the provision of IPS. The Draft IPS Circular is expected to address the loopholes in the existing Circular 39 and usher in momentous changes to the legal framework governing IPS in Vietnam. Given the anticipated short transitional period for compliance, IPS providers should closely monitor the progress of this draft circular to ensure they are fully prepared to comply with its new requirements.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Technology

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 4, 2026
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) could soon see some important changes, as a draft bill to amend the PDPA has been introduced in the House of Representatives. The draft amendment is currently in the public consultation phase, with comments accepted from July 16 to August 15, 2026. If enacted in its current form, the amendment would make three key changes: expanding the government exemption to cover anticorruption operations, introducing a statutory definition of “government agency,” and restructuring the lawful bases for personal data processing to align with international standards. Background The PDPA has encountered several enforcement challenges since its implementation, including three core problems identified by the bill’s sponsors: (1) the current exemptions for government agencies do not cover anticorruption and misconduct-prevention operations; (2) the PDPA lacks a clear statutory definition of “government agency,” causing legal uncertainty as to which entities are covered; and (3) the existing framework for lawful bases of data processing does not align with international standards—particularly the multiple-lawful-bases system in the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—making compliance inflexible for both government and private sector entities. Expanded Government Exemption The current PDPA exempts government agencies performing duties related to national security (including fiscal security), public safety, anti-money laundering, forensic science, and cybersecurity. The proposed amendment adds “prevention and suppression of corruption and misconduct” to this list of exempted functions. This would allow anticorruption bodies—most notably the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), which is identified as a directly affected party—to collect, use, and disclose personal data without being subject to PDPA requirements when carrying out their duties. New Statutory Definition of “Government Agency” Notably, while the current PDPA use the term “government agency” in several provisions, the term is not comprehensively defined, creating potential uncertainty as to its scope. The draft bill therefore
Read More
August 4, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Vietnam chapter to Fintech 2027, a global guide published by Lexology Panoramic that provides comparative insights into the legal and regulatory frameworks governing fintech businesses across multiple jurisdictions. The Vietnam chapter offers a comprehensive overview of the country’s rapidly evolving fintech landscape, examining both the regulatory environment and practical considerations for businesses operating in or entering the Vietnamese market. Topics covered include: Fintech landscape and initiatives: General innovation climate; government and regulatory support Financial regulation: Regulatory bodies; regulated activities; consumer lending; secondary market loan trading; collective investment schemes; alternative investment funds; peer-to-peer and marketplace lending; crowdfunding; invoice trading; payment services; open banking; robo-advice; insurance products; credit references Cross-border regulation: Passporting; requirement for a local presence Sales and marketing: Restrictions on the promotion and marketing of financial products and services Cryptoassets and tokens: Distributed ledger technology; cryptoassets; token issuance Artificial intelligence: Regulatory framework governing AI systems and AI-enabled financial services Change of control: Notification and consent requirements for regulated businesses Financial crime: Anti-bribery and anti-money laundering procedures; regulatory guidance Data protection and cybersecurity: Data protection obligations; cybersecurity requirements applicable to fintech businesses Outsourcing and cloud computing: Outsourcing of material functions; use of cloud computing in the financial services industry Intellectual property rights: IP protection for software; employee- and contractor-created IP; joint ownership; trade secrets; branding; remedies for infringement Competition: Competition law issues affecting fintech businesses Tax: Incentives for innovation and investment; developments affecting tax and compliance obligations Immigration: Immigration options for recruiting skilled foreign personnel; special measures available through Vietnam’s international financial centers The chapter also examines a number of significant recent developments shaping Vietnam’s fintech sector, including the introduction of the country’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptoassets, the adoption of a dedicated law on artificial intelligence, implementation of the banking regulatory sandbox,
Read More
August 3, 2026
On July 23, 2026, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) released for public comment its draft Notification on Digital Channel Security, which would significantly expand the scope and stringency of Thailand’s existing mobile banking security framework. If finalized in its current form, the draft notification would extend mandatory security requirements to credit card providers and credit providers, cover internet banking in addition to mobile applications, phase out SMS one-time passwords (OTPs) for transaction authentication, and introduce biometric verification requirements for high-value transactions. The public comment period is open through August 24, 2026. Background The BOT’s existing Mobile Banking Security Notification, issued in 2024, sets minimum security standards for financial institutions, specialized financial institutions (SFIs), and e-money providers, significantly reducing “money-draining app” fraud. However, fraudsters have since shifted to nonbank providers and internet banking channels, prompting the BOT to propose broader security requirements. Expanded Scope of Regulated Entities and Channels The existing Mobile Banking Security Notification covers only financial institutions, SFIs, and e-money providers offering mobile banking services. The draft expands coverage in two key areas: entities and channels. On the entity side, it adds credit card providers and credit providers that offer fund transfers to third parties at other financial service providers or that provide cash withdrawal services to individual retail customers. On the channel side, it broadens coverage to include internet banking in addition to mobile banking. Strengthened Customer Authentication The draft introduces enhanced authentication requirements in three areas: Service enrollment and device changes. Providers must implement rigorous identity verification, notify customers of enrollment results through out-of-band communication channels, and adopt risk-mitigation measures such as cooling-off periods and temporary transaction limits. Transaction-level authentication. Providers must use two-factor authentication for fund transfers, cardless ATM withdrawals, and transaction limit increases. Secure authentication factors. Key requirements include the following: “What-you-know” factors must
Read More
July 28, 2026
Data protection officers (DPOs) have become a fixture of Thailand’s privacy compliance landscape since the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) took full effect and the Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) began requiring certain organizations to appoint them. On July 7, 2026, the Office of the PDPC presented draft guidance on DPOs as part of a public consultation on a series of draft personal data protection manuals and recommendations. The draft offers the clearest indication yet of how the regulator expects the DPO role to work in practice, addressing recurring implementation issues under the PDPA—including when an organization must appoint a DPO, how the DPO should operate independently, how to manage conflicts of interest, and how data subjects and regulators should be able to contact the DPO. Because it remains in draft, organizations have an opportunity to weigh the practical implications now before the guidance is finalized. When a DPO Must Be Appointed The draft guidance clarifies the triggers for mandatory DPO appointment, including: Regular and systematic monitoring of personal data or systems on a large scale, such as tracking, analyzing, or predicting behavior, attitudes, or individual characteristics. Core activities involving large-scale processing of sensitive personal data, such as health data, biometric data, or criminal records. Certain foreign-organization representative arrangements. Public-sector coverage under relevant notifications identifying government entities that must appoint a DPO. Processing involving 100,000 or more data subjects may be considered large-scale. The guidance also contemplates voluntary DPO appointment for organizations that wish to raise their privacy governance standards, and such organizations should still comply with the standards applicable to DPOs under the law. Independence and Reporting Lines The draft guidance identifies lack of DPO independence as a core risk because an ineffective or constrained DPO may be unable to raise deficiencies
Read More